书评:在中世纪的英格兰去教堂

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Colmán N. Ó Clabaigh
{"title":"书评:在中世纪的英格兰去教堂","authors":"Colmán N. Ó Clabaigh","doi":"10.1177/00211400221085759c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The final section of the volume explores the legacy of Eriugena, an often neglected aspect of Eriugena scholarship. Agnieszka Kijewska reveals the presence of his work in the schools and monasteries of the 12th century, while David Albertson looks at the Eriugena tradition in the later medieval and early Renaissance periods, with a particular study of the themes of negation, theophany, and anthropology in the thought of Nicholas of Cusa. Dermot Moran sketches Eriugena’s reception in modernity, particularly with respect to German Idealism. Stephen Lahey’s short essay includes an important summary of the Amaurician heresy (since it is relevant to the condemnation of the Periphyseon in CE 1225), but it is unclear why he follows this with a brief exposition of Idealism in Eriugena’s thought. This essay also appears misplaced (coming last) in the chronological ordering of essays in this section. Finally, the words of Pope Benedict XVI regarding Eriugena is a welcome addition in the Appendix, in which the Irish master is recommended as a source of inspiration to contemporary theologians: his endeavour to ‘express the expressible of the inexpressible God,’ the pope wrote in 2009, cultivates a ‘constant readiness to conversion.’","PeriodicalId":55939,"journal":{"name":"Irish Theological Quarterly","volume":"87 1","pages":"174 - 176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Going to Church in Medieval England\",\"authors\":\"Colmán N. Ó Clabaigh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00211400221085759c\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The final section of the volume explores the legacy of Eriugena, an often neglected aspect of Eriugena scholarship. Agnieszka Kijewska reveals the presence of his work in the schools and monasteries of the 12th century, while David Albertson looks at the Eriugena tradition in the later medieval and early Renaissance periods, with a particular study of the themes of negation, theophany, and anthropology in the thought of Nicholas of Cusa. Dermot Moran sketches Eriugena’s reception in modernity, particularly with respect to German Idealism. Stephen Lahey’s short essay includes an important summary of the Amaurician heresy (since it is relevant to the condemnation of the Periphyseon in CE 1225), but it is unclear why he follows this with a brief exposition of Idealism in Eriugena’s thought. This essay also appears misplaced (coming last) in the chronological ordering of essays in this section. Finally, the words of Pope Benedict XVI regarding Eriugena is a welcome addition in the Appendix, in which the Irish master is recommended as a source of inspiration to contemporary theologians: his endeavour to ‘express the expressible of the inexpressible God,’ the pope wrote in 2009, cultivates a ‘constant readiness to conversion.’\",\"PeriodicalId\":55939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Theological Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"174 - 176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Theological Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400221085759c\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Theological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400221085759c","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卷的最后一节探讨了留热那的遗产,一个经常被忽视的方面留热那奖学金。Agnieszka Kijewska揭示了他的作品在12世纪的学校和修道院的存在,而David Albertson则着眼于中世纪后期和文艺复兴早期的Eriugena传统,特别研究了Cusa的尼古拉斯思想中的否定,显灵和人类学主题。Dermot Moran概述了Eriugena在现代性中的接受,特别是在德国理想主义方面。Stephen Lahey的短文包含了对阿毛里亚异端的重要总结(因为它与1225年对Periphyseon的谴责有关),但不清楚他为什么在此之后简要阐述了Eriugena思想中的唯心主义。这篇文章在本节文章的时间顺序中也出现了错位(排在最后)。最后,教皇本笃十六世(Pope Benedict XVI)关于埃留热纳(Eriugena)的话在附录中得到了欢迎,在附录中,这位爱尔兰大师被推荐为当代神学家的灵感来源:教皇在2009年写道,他努力“表达不可表达的上帝的可表达之物”,培养了一种“随时准备皈依的态度”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: Going to Church in Medieval England
The final section of the volume explores the legacy of Eriugena, an often neglected aspect of Eriugena scholarship. Agnieszka Kijewska reveals the presence of his work in the schools and monasteries of the 12th century, while David Albertson looks at the Eriugena tradition in the later medieval and early Renaissance periods, with a particular study of the themes of negation, theophany, and anthropology in the thought of Nicholas of Cusa. Dermot Moran sketches Eriugena’s reception in modernity, particularly with respect to German Idealism. Stephen Lahey’s short essay includes an important summary of the Amaurician heresy (since it is relevant to the condemnation of the Periphyseon in CE 1225), but it is unclear why he follows this with a brief exposition of Idealism in Eriugena’s thought. This essay also appears misplaced (coming last) in the chronological ordering of essays in this section. Finally, the words of Pope Benedict XVI regarding Eriugena is a welcome addition in the Appendix, in which the Irish master is recommended as a source of inspiration to contemporary theologians: his endeavour to ‘express the expressible of the inexpressible God,’ the pope wrote in 2009, cultivates a ‘constant readiness to conversion.’
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信