考虑不确定条件下的道德因素的多准则供应商评价/选择

M. Azadfallah
{"title":"考虑不确定条件下的道德因素的多准则供应商评价/选择","authors":"M. Azadfallah","doi":"10.1504/IJSSS.2019.101734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, companies pay more attention to ethic and ethical issues have become a key determinant of performance in the business arena. This is not an area which has been systematically examined. From the literature, it appears to be assumed that the supplier selection is multiple attribute decision making/multiple criteria decision making (MADM/MCDM) problem, information and performances usually incomplete and uncertain, and supplier ethics is becoming another key factor to consider, too. The question typically posed is; how ethical factor can be modelled formally for an established MCDM models? In this paper, we propose a new interval TOPSIS-based procedure to resolve this problem. So, the proposed method has a capability to identify a measure of unethical performance with input and output system balancing, and consist of the two-step. In the first step, a new interval TOPSIS-based approach is used, results of this step are input for conventional interval TOPSIS method in the second step. The results indicate that the accuracy of the decision has been increased by considering the ethical factors.","PeriodicalId":89681,"journal":{"name":"International journal of society systems science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJSSS.2019.101734","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-criteria supplier evaluation/selection by considering ethical factors under uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"M. Azadfallah\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJSSS.2019.101734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, companies pay more attention to ethic and ethical issues have become a key determinant of performance in the business arena. This is not an area which has been systematically examined. From the literature, it appears to be assumed that the supplier selection is multiple attribute decision making/multiple criteria decision making (MADM/MCDM) problem, information and performances usually incomplete and uncertain, and supplier ethics is becoming another key factor to consider, too. The question typically posed is; how ethical factor can be modelled formally for an established MCDM models? In this paper, we propose a new interval TOPSIS-based procedure to resolve this problem. So, the proposed method has a capability to identify a measure of unethical performance with input and output system balancing, and consist of the two-step. In the first step, a new interval TOPSIS-based approach is used, results of this step are input for conventional interval TOPSIS method in the second step. The results indicate that the accuracy of the decision has been increased by considering the ethical factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of society systems science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJSSS.2019.101734\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of society systems science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSS.2019.101734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of society systems science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSS.2019.101734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,公司更加注重伦理和道德问题已成为一个关键的决定因素,在商业领域的表现。这不是一个系统研究过的领域。从文献来看,供应商选择似乎被假设为多属性决策/多标准决策(MADM/MCDM)问题,信息和绩效通常是不完整和不确定的,供应商伦理也成为另一个需要考虑的关键因素。通常提出的问题是;如何为已建立的MCDM模型正式建模道德因素?本文提出了一种新的基于区间topsis的方法来解决这一问题。因此,所提出的方法具有识别具有输入和输出系统平衡的不道德绩效度量的能力,并且由两步组成。第一步采用一种新的基于区间TOPSIS的方法,将这一步的结果输入到第二步的常规区间TOPSIS方法中。结果表明,考虑了伦理因素,提高了决策的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-criteria supplier evaluation/selection by considering ethical factors under uncertainty
In recent years, companies pay more attention to ethic and ethical issues have become a key determinant of performance in the business arena. This is not an area which has been systematically examined. From the literature, it appears to be assumed that the supplier selection is multiple attribute decision making/multiple criteria decision making (MADM/MCDM) problem, information and performances usually incomplete and uncertain, and supplier ethics is becoming another key factor to consider, too. The question typically posed is; how ethical factor can be modelled formally for an established MCDM models? In this paper, we propose a new interval TOPSIS-based procedure to resolve this problem. So, the proposed method has a capability to identify a measure of unethical performance with input and output system balancing, and consist of the two-step. In the first step, a new interval TOPSIS-based approach is used, results of this step are input for conventional interval TOPSIS method in the second step. The results indicate that the accuracy of the decision has been increased by considering the ethical factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信