Robert D. Norman, H. Garg, Lanette Rickborn, D. Kaushik, D. Pruthi, Ahmed M. Mansour, Ian M. Thompson, M. Liss
{"title":"男性高级别前列腺上皮内瘤变或非典型小腺泡增生的临床意义前列腺癌","authors":"Robert D. Norman, H. Garg, Lanette Rickborn, D. Kaushik, D. Pruthi, Ahmed M. Mansour, Ian M. Thompson, M. Liss","doi":"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The clinical management of Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation (ASAP) and High-Grade Prostate Intraepithelial Neoplasia (HGPIN) varies significantly. The aim of this study was to characterize the incidence and natural history of ASAP and HGPIN lesions to optimize follow-up strategies.\n \n \n \n A retrospective analysis of patients at a VA Medical Center who underwent a prostate needle biopsy between 1988 and 2017 was performed. The pathological lesions were grouped as ASAP, HGPIN, and ASAP & HGPIN. The primary outcome was the incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) defined as grade group ≥2 prostate cancer.\n \n \n \n Of 6104 patients screened, 312 patients included having ASAP (n = 70, 1.1%), HGPIN (n = 222, 3.6%), or ASAP & HGPIN (n = 20, 0.3%). Follow-up biopsy was performed in 99.3% of patients. The incidence of prostate cancer in ASAP, HGPIN, or ASAP & HGPIN groups was 46.3%, 37%, and 68.4%, respectively (P = .03). However, the rate of csPCa was similar across the 3 groups (10.1% in ASAP, 10.3% in HGPIN, and 10.5% in ASAP & HGPIN, P = .6). The median time to cancer diagnosis was significantly shorter for patients with ASAP (2.8 years for ASAP, 4.9 years for HGPIN, and 1.5 years for ASAP & HGPIN, P = .001); however, there was no significant difference in time to diagnosis of csPCa between the various groups (P = .7).\n \n \n \n Both ASAP and HGPIN have a low risk of progression to csPCa. This, coupled with a prolonged time to any cancer diagnosis, suggests that immediate repeat biopsy might not be necessary among these patients.\n","PeriodicalId":74033,"journal":{"name":"JU open plus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men With High-Grade Intraepithelial Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation\",\"authors\":\"Robert D. Norman, H. Garg, Lanette Rickborn, D. Kaushik, D. Pruthi, Ahmed M. Mansour, Ian M. Thompson, M. Liss\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n The clinical management of Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation (ASAP) and High-Grade Prostate Intraepithelial Neoplasia (HGPIN) varies significantly. The aim of this study was to characterize the incidence and natural history of ASAP and HGPIN lesions to optimize follow-up strategies.\\n \\n \\n \\n A retrospective analysis of patients at a VA Medical Center who underwent a prostate needle biopsy between 1988 and 2017 was performed. The pathological lesions were grouped as ASAP, HGPIN, and ASAP & HGPIN. The primary outcome was the incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) defined as grade group ≥2 prostate cancer.\\n \\n \\n \\n Of 6104 patients screened, 312 patients included having ASAP (n = 70, 1.1%), HGPIN (n = 222, 3.6%), or ASAP & HGPIN (n = 20, 0.3%). Follow-up biopsy was performed in 99.3% of patients. The incidence of prostate cancer in ASAP, HGPIN, or ASAP & HGPIN groups was 46.3%, 37%, and 68.4%, respectively (P = .03). However, the rate of csPCa was similar across the 3 groups (10.1% in ASAP, 10.3% in HGPIN, and 10.5% in ASAP & HGPIN, P = .6). The median time to cancer diagnosis was significantly shorter for patients with ASAP (2.8 years for ASAP, 4.9 years for HGPIN, and 1.5 years for ASAP & HGPIN, P = .001); however, there was no significant difference in time to diagnosis of csPCa between the various groups (P = .7).\\n \\n \\n \\n Both ASAP and HGPIN have a low risk of progression to csPCa. This, coupled with a prolonged time to any cancer diagnosis, suggests that immediate repeat biopsy might not be necessary among these patients.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":74033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JU open plus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JU open plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JU open plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men With High-Grade Intraepithelial Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation
The clinical management of Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation (ASAP) and High-Grade Prostate Intraepithelial Neoplasia (HGPIN) varies significantly. The aim of this study was to characterize the incidence and natural history of ASAP and HGPIN lesions to optimize follow-up strategies.
A retrospective analysis of patients at a VA Medical Center who underwent a prostate needle biopsy between 1988 and 2017 was performed. The pathological lesions were grouped as ASAP, HGPIN, and ASAP & HGPIN. The primary outcome was the incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) defined as grade group ≥2 prostate cancer.
Of 6104 patients screened, 312 patients included having ASAP (n = 70, 1.1%), HGPIN (n = 222, 3.6%), or ASAP & HGPIN (n = 20, 0.3%). Follow-up biopsy was performed in 99.3% of patients. The incidence of prostate cancer in ASAP, HGPIN, or ASAP & HGPIN groups was 46.3%, 37%, and 68.4%, respectively (P = .03). However, the rate of csPCa was similar across the 3 groups (10.1% in ASAP, 10.3% in HGPIN, and 10.5% in ASAP & HGPIN, P = .6). The median time to cancer diagnosis was significantly shorter for patients with ASAP (2.8 years for ASAP, 4.9 years for HGPIN, and 1.5 years for ASAP & HGPIN, P = .001); however, there was no significant difference in time to diagnosis of csPCa between the various groups (P = .7).
Both ASAP and HGPIN have a low risk of progression to csPCa. This, coupled with a prolonged time to any cancer diagnosis, suggests that immediate repeat biopsy might not be necessary among these patients.