跨学科性:寻求科学技术知识的统一

IF 0.3 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Lilian Alvares, P. Freire
{"title":"跨学科性:寻求科学技术知识的统一","authors":"Lilian Alvares, P. Freire","doi":"10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670175/29661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Reflections about the unity of knowledge have taken place at various times in history. Modern science, however, brings in its wake the issue of disciplinary specialization, which caused a profound change in the search for scientific knowledge. The new disciplinary order, increasingly specialized, hindered the integrated vision of science and knowledge, leading to a distancing from the various realities contained in the same problem or circumstance, and even disregarding the necessary integration among knowledges. Objectives: To understand the relevance of searching for all aspects of the same situation, this research aims to deepen the contributions and understandings of some of the first thinkers who dealt with the unity of knowledge, extending to Kurt Gödel, considered as the father of transdisciplinary, and to Mode 2 of knowledge production by Michael Gibbons. Method: This study consists of an interpretivist, qualitative research, resulting in a critical literature review, which synthesized the information through evaluation and in-depth discussion about the unity of scientific and technological knowledge. Results: Unity of knowledge refers to the fact that conditioned knowledge can only achieve its integrity through unconditioned knowledge, the latter not merely a contingent aggregate, but an indispensable system for the complete identity of conditioned knowledge. Conclusion: Transdisciplinary, in this respect, is the search for the unity of knowledge, beyond disciplinary boundaries, to capture the full complexity of the multidimensional and the multi-referential Reality of the conditioned element","PeriodicalId":36988,"journal":{"name":"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transdisciplinarity:the search for the unity of scientific and technological knowledge\",\"authors\":\"Lilian Alvares, P. Freire\",\"doi\":\"10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670175/29661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Reflections about the unity of knowledge have taken place at various times in history. Modern science, however, brings in its wake the issue of disciplinary specialization, which caused a profound change in the search for scientific knowledge. The new disciplinary order, increasingly specialized, hindered the integrated vision of science and knowledge, leading to a distancing from the various realities contained in the same problem or circumstance, and even disregarding the necessary integration among knowledges. Objectives: To understand the relevance of searching for all aspects of the same situation, this research aims to deepen the contributions and understandings of some of the first thinkers who dealt with the unity of knowledge, extending to Kurt Gödel, considered as the father of transdisciplinary, and to Mode 2 of knowledge production by Michael Gibbons. Method: This study consists of an interpretivist, qualitative research, resulting in a critical literature review, which synthesized the information through evaluation and in-depth discussion about the unity of scientific and technological knowledge. Results: Unity of knowledge refers to the fact that conditioned knowledge can only achieve its integrity through unconditioned knowledge, the latter not merely a contingent aggregate, but an indispensable system for the complete identity of conditioned knowledge. Conclusion: Transdisciplinary, in this respect, is the search for the unity of knowledge, beyond disciplinary boundaries, to capture the full complexity of the multidimensional and the multi-referential Reality of the conditioned element\",\"PeriodicalId\":36988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670175/29661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670175/29661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:关于知识统一性的思考在历史上的不同时期都发生过。然而,现代科学带来了学科专业化的问题,这在科学知识的探索中引起了深刻的变化。新的学科秩序,越来越专业化,阻碍了科学和知识的综合视野,导致了对同一问题或环境中包含的各种现实的距离,甚至忽视了知识之间必要的整合。目的:为了理解搜索同一情境的所有方面的相关性,本研究旨在深化一些最早处理知识统一性的思想家的贡献和理解,延伸到被认为是跨学科之父的Kurt Gödel,以及Michael Gibbons的知识生产模式2。方法:本研究采用解释主义的定性研究,通过批判性的文献综述,通过对科技知识统一性的评价和深入讨论,综合信息。结果:知识的统一性是指条件知识只有通过无条件知识才能达到其完整性,而无条件知识不仅是偶然的集合,而且是条件知识完全同一性不可或缺的系统。结论:在这方面,跨学科是对超越学科界限的知识统一性的探索,以捕捉有条件元素的多维度和多指涉现实的全部复杂性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transdisciplinarity:the search for the unity of scientific and technological knowledge
Introduction: Reflections about the unity of knowledge have taken place at various times in history. Modern science, however, brings in its wake the issue of disciplinary specialization, which caused a profound change in the search for scientific knowledge. The new disciplinary order, increasingly specialized, hindered the integrated vision of science and knowledge, leading to a distancing from the various realities contained in the same problem or circumstance, and even disregarding the necessary integration among knowledges. Objectives: To understand the relevance of searching for all aspects of the same situation, this research aims to deepen the contributions and understandings of some of the first thinkers who dealt with the unity of knowledge, extending to Kurt Gödel, considered as the father of transdisciplinary, and to Mode 2 of knowledge production by Michael Gibbons. Method: This study consists of an interpretivist, qualitative research, resulting in a critical literature review, which synthesized the information through evaluation and in-depth discussion about the unity of scientific and technological knowledge. Results: Unity of knowledge refers to the fact that conditioned knowledge can only achieve its integrity through unconditioned knowledge, the latter not merely a contingent aggregate, but an indispensable system for the complete identity of conditioned knowledge. Conclusion: Transdisciplinary, in this respect, is the search for the unity of knowledge, beyond disciplinary boundaries, to capture the full complexity of the multidimensional and the multi-referential Reality of the conditioned element
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao
Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信