联合盟友:为英国黑人非洲裔加勒比社区共同制作前列腺癌应用程序的好处和紧张关系

IF 4.6 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sarah Seymour‐Smith, David J. Brown, A. Burton, N. Shopland, Masood Khan, Roseann Thompson, Lindsay Thompson, Lisa Jackson, Wayne Marston, Roydon Allen
{"title":"联合盟友:为英国黑人非洲裔加勒比社区共同制作前列腺癌应用程序的好处和紧张关系","authors":"Sarah Seymour‐Smith, David J. Brown, A. Burton, N. Shopland, Masood Khan, Roseann Thompson, Lindsay Thompson, Lisa Jackson, Wayne Marston, Roydon Allen","doi":"10.1080/14780887.2020.1861491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper we use a case study, the co-production of a prostate cancer app with, and for, Black British African-Caribbean communities, to discuss benefits and tensions of inclusive practice and allyship. We view our collaborators as joint partners, and joint allies, for the Black British African-Caribbean community. Here, we document the research process and highlight successful aspects of our collaboration such as mentoring, recruitment, ideas on the format and presentation of the app, supportive data collection practices, useful community feedback and promotion of the app. We also highlight points in the research process that in hindsight needed more discussion and careful negotiation. We end with some recommendations based on our experience.","PeriodicalId":48420,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14780887.2020.1861491","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Joint allies: Benefits and tensions of co-producing a prostate cancer app for, and with, the Black British African-Caribbean community\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Seymour‐Smith, David J. Brown, A. Burton, N. Shopland, Masood Khan, Roseann Thompson, Lindsay Thompson, Lisa Jackson, Wayne Marston, Roydon Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14780887.2020.1861491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this paper we use a case study, the co-production of a prostate cancer app with, and for, Black British African-Caribbean communities, to discuss benefits and tensions of inclusive practice and allyship. We view our collaborators as joint partners, and joint allies, for the Black British African-Caribbean community. Here, we document the research process and highlight successful aspects of our collaboration such as mentoring, recruitment, ideas on the format and presentation of the app, supportive data collection practices, useful community feedback and promotion of the app. We also highlight points in the research process that in hindsight needed more discussion and careful negotiation. We end with some recommendations based on our experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Research in Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14780887.2020.1861491\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Research in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1861491\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1861491","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在本文中,我们使用一个案例研究,与英国黑人非洲裔加勒比社区共同制作前列腺癌应用程序,讨论包容性实践和盟友关系的好处和紧张关系。我们把我们的合作者视为英国黑人、非洲裔加勒比社区的共同伙伴和共同盟友。在这里,我们记录了研究过程,并强调了我们合作的成功方面,如指导、招聘、关于应用程序格式和展示的想法、支持性数据收集实践、有用的社区反馈和应用程序的推广。我们还强调了研究过程中事后需要更多讨论和仔细协商的要点。最后,我们根据自己的经验提出一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Joint allies: Benefits and tensions of co-producing a prostate cancer app for, and with, the Black British African-Caribbean community
ABSTRACT In this paper we use a case study, the co-production of a prostate cancer app with, and for, Black British African-Caribbean communities, to discuss benefits and tensions of inclusive practice and allyship. We view our collaborators as joint partners, and joint allies, for the Black British African-Caribbean community. Here, we document the research process and highlight successful aspects of our collaboration such as mentoring, recruitment, ideas on the format and presentation of the app, supportive data collection practices, useful community feedback and promotion of the app. We also highlight points in the research process that in hindsight needed more discussion and careful negotiation. We end with some recommendations based on our experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Qualitative Research in Psychology
Qualitative Research in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
20.00
自引率
0.50%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Qualitative Research in Psychology is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality, original research. It aims to become the primary forum for qualitative researchers in all areas of psychology, including cognitive, social, developmental, educational, clinical, health, and forensic psychology. The journal also welcomes psychologically relevant qualitative research from other disciplines. It seeks innovative and pioneering work that advances the field of qualitative research in psychology. The journal has published state-of-the-art debates on various research approaches, methods, and analytic techniques, such as discourse analysis, interpretative phenomenological analysis, visual analyses, and online research. It has also explored the role of qualitative research in fields like psychosocial studies and feminist psychology. Additionally, the journal has provided informative articles on ethics, transcription, interviewee recruitment, and has introduced innovative research techniques like photovoice, autoethnography, template analysis, and psychogeography. While the predominant audience consists of psychology professionals using qualitative research methods in academic, clinical, or occupational settings, the journal has an interdisciplinary focus. It aims to raise awareness of psychology as a social science that encompasses various qualitative approaches. In summary, Qualitative Research in Psychology is a leading forum for qualitative researchers in psychology. It publishes cutting-edge research, explores different research approaches and techniques, and encourages interdisciplinary collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信