41个国家自然灾害、电力与经济增长关系的稳健分析

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Nadia Benali, Kais Saidi
{"title":"41个国家自然灾害、电力与经济增长关系的稳健分析","authors":"Nadia Benali, Kais Saidi","doi":"10.35866/CAUJED.2017.42.3.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)1. INTRODUCTIONNatural disasters are now better known. They are well investigated and mapped both locally and global scale. Natural disasters are liable to cause serious economic and social disruption. The immediate damage is decrease production, expenditures and the number of hours worked. According to the data reported by EM-DAT, Americas suffered in 2014 from 76 natural disasters and the damage reached US$ 25.8 billion. On the other side, Africa suffered from 39 natural disasters, a number far below its 2004-2013 annual average. According to EM-DAT (2014), the damages from natural disasters in European countries represent approximately US$ 7.8 billion.The occurrence of natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, storms and volcanic eruptions have negative effects on the electrical system operation. The earthquakes that have hit several countries such as China, Italy, Japan and the United States have severe impact economic, environmental and human. In addition, they destroyed their power system equipment.The response of the authorities has led in practice by the implementation of prevention and risk management systems evolving since the 1980s, resulting in an abundance of tools and acronyms that thwarts their ownership all players. In the period immediately following the event, reconstruction efforts are offset these losses and, paradoxically, create a net stimulatory effect on economic growth. To achieve this objective, it is necessary to measure or estimate economic costs of such disasters. In this sense, many studies have examined the debate in a macro-economic perspective by exploring how disasters affect real GDP per capita.In general, economic effects due to disasters can be classified into two categories: direct damage and indirect damage. The main findings shown that the direct effects of natural disasters depend on the level of development of the affected countries (Kahn, 2005).Most empirical studies have shown that natural disasters have a negative indirect damage in short-term, such as effects on economic growth (Noy, 2009; Fomby et al., 2013). Although long-term studies are still relatively rare and yet failed to provide consistent results (Skidmore and Toya, 2002; Noy and Nualsri, 2007; Jaramillo, 2009.).The contribution of this article is to assess the effects of natural disaster on economic growth, physical capital, labor and electricity. Furthermore, our study of literature suggests that few studies have examined the impact of natural disaster on the electricity. For this purpose, we use a Panel data and Granger causality-VECM model, including four types of disasters (earthquakes, storms, floods and droughts) in about 41 countries over the period 1990 to 2014.The sections of this paper presented as follows. The literature review section presents a brief literature review. The data section details the data used in the empirical part. The descriptive statistics and correlation matrix section summarizes the key statistics and correlation of the total variables. The model specification section describes the econometric method. The estimation methods and empirical results section discusses the empirical findings. Finally, conclusion and policy implications section.2. REVIEW OF THE RELEVANT LITERATURE2.1.Natural Disaster and Economic GrowthThere is a considerable attention in literature about the impact of natural disaster on economic growth. For instance, Albala-Bertrand (1993) investigated the effects of natural disaster on the economy and society in developing countries. He concluded that in reality disasters do not represent a problem for development. Benson (1997a, b, and c), Benson and Clay (1998, 2001) evaluated the impact of natural disasters on economic growth in some countries such as Fiji, Vietnam, Philippines, and Dominica. The findings showed that disasters shocks have a severe negative short-run economic consequence, with increase of property, and worsening inequalities. …","PeriodicalId":15602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economic development","volume":"42 1","pages":"89-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Robust Analysis of the Relationship between Natural Disasters, Electricity and Economic Growth in 41 Countries\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Benali, Kais Saidi\",\"doi\":\"10.35866/CAUJED.2017.42.3.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)1. INTRODUCTIONNatural disasters are now better known. They are well investigated and mapped both locally and global scale. Natural disasters are liable to cause serious economic and social disruption. The immediate damage is decrease production, expenditures and the number of hours worked. According to the data reported by EM-DAT, Americas suffered in 2014 from 76 natural disasters and the damage reached US$ 25.8 billion. On the other side, Africa suffered from 39 natural disasters, a number far below its 2004-2013 annual average. According to EM-DAT (2014), the damages from natural disasters in European countries represent approximately US$ 7.8 billion.The occurrence of natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, storms and volcanic eruptions have negative effects on the electrical system operation. The earthquakes that have hit several countries such as China, Italy, Japan and the United States have severe impact economic, environmental and human. In addition, they destroyed their power system equipment.The response of the authorities has led in practice by the implementation of prevention and risk management systems evolving since the 1980s, resulting in an abundance of tools and acronyms that thwarts their ownership all players. In the period immediately following the event, reconstruction efforts are offset these losses and, paradoxically, create a net stimulatory effect on economic growth. To achieve this objective, it is necessary to measure or estimate economic costs of such disasters. In this sense, many studies have examined the debate in a macro-economic perspective by exploring how disasters affect real GDP per capita.In general, economic effects due to disasters can be classified into two categories: direct damage and indirect damage. The main findings shown that the direct effects of natural disasters depend on the level of development of the affected countries (Kahn, 2005).Most empirical studies have shown that natural disasters have a negative indirect damage in short-term, such as effects on economic growth (Noy, 2009; Fomby et al., 2013). Although long-term studies are still relatively rare and yet failed to provide consistent results (Skidmore and Toya, 2002; Noy and Nualsri, 2007; Jaramillo, 2009.).The contribution of this article is to assess the effects of natural disaster on economic growth, physical capital, labor and electricity. Furthermore, our study of literature suggests that few studies have examined the impact of natural disaster on the electricity. For this purpose, we use a Panel data and Granger causality-VECM model, including four types of disasters (earthquakes, storms, floods and droughts) in about 41 countries over the period 1990 to 2014.The sections of this paper presented as follows. The literature review section presents a brief literature review. The data section details the data used in the empirical part. The descriptive statistics and correlation matrix section summarizes the key statistics and correlation of the total variables. The model specification section describes the econometric method. The estimation methods and empirical results section discusses the empirical findings. Finally, conclusion and policy implications section.2. REVIEW OF THE RELEVANT LITERATURE2.1.Natural Disaster and Economic GrowthThere is a considerable attention in literature about the impact of natural disaster on economic growth. For instance, Albala-Bertrand (1993) investigated the effects of natural disaster on the economy and society in developing countries. He concluded that in reality disasters do not represent a problem for development. Benson (1997a, b, and c), Benson and Clay (1998, 2001) evaluated the impact of natural disasters on economic growth in some countries such as Fiji, Vietnam, Philippines, and Dominica. The findings showed that disasters shocks have a severe negative short-run economic consequence, with increase of property, and worsening inequalities. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":15602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of economic development\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"89-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of economic development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35866/CAUJED.2017.42.3.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economic development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35866/CAUJED.2017.42.3.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

(ProQuest:…表示省略的公式。)1。简介自然灾害现在更为人所知。它们在当地和全球范围内都得到了很好的调查和绘制。自然灾害容易造成严重的经济和社会混乱。直接的损害是生产、支出和工作小时数的减少。根据EM-DAT报告的数据,2014年美洲遭受了76次自然灾害,损失达到258亿美元。另一方面,非洲遭受了39次自然灾害,这一数字远低于2004-2013年的年平均水平。根据EM-DAT(2014),欧洲国家自然灾害造成的损失约为78亿美元。地震、飓风、龙卷风、洪水、风暴和火山爆发等自然灾害的发生会对电力系统的运行产生负面影响。中国、意大利、日本和美国等几个国家发生的地震对经济、环境和人类造成了严重影响。此外,他们还摧毁了电力系统设备。当局的反应在实践中导致了自20世纪80年代以来不断发展的预防和风险管理系统的实施,产生了大量的工具和缩写词,阻碍了所有参与者的所有权。在事件发生后的一段时间内,重建工作抵消了这些损失,矛盾的是,对经济增长产生了净刺激效应。为了实现这一目标,有必要衡量或估计此类灾害的经济成本。从这个意义上说,许多研究从宏观经济的角度考察了这场辩论,探讨了灾害如何影响实际人均GDP。一般来说,灾害造成的经济影响可分为两类:直接损害和间接损害。主要研究结果表明,自然灾害的直接影响取决于受影响国家的发展水平(Kahn,2005)。大多数实证研究表明,自然灾难在短期内具有负面的间接损害,例如对经济增长的影响(Noy,2009;Fomby等人,2013)。尽管长期研究仍然相对罕见,但未能提供一致的结果(Skidmore和Toya,2002;Noy和Nualsri,2007;Jaramillo,2009。)。本文的贡献是评估自然灾害对经济增长、实物资本、劳动力和电力的影响。此外,我们对文献的研究表明,很少有研究考察自然灾害对电力的影响。为此,我们使用了Panel数据和Granger因果VECM模型,包括1990年至2014年期间约41个国家的四种类型的灾害(地震、风暴、洪水和干旱)。本文各部分如下。文献综述部分简要介绍了文献综述。数据部分详细介绍了经验部分使用的数据。描述性统计和相关矩阵部分总结了总变量的关键统计和相关性。模型规范部分描述了计量经济学方法。估计方法和实证结果部分讨论了实证结果。最后,结论与政策启示部分。2.1自然灾害与经济增长文献中对自然灾害对经济增长的影响给予了相当大的关注。例如,Albala Bertrand(1993)调查了自然灾害对发展中国家经济和社会的影响。他得出的结论是,在现实中,灾害并不代表发展问题。Benson(1997a、b和c)、Benson和Clay(19982001)评估了自然灾害对斐济、越南、菲律宾和多米尼克等一些国家经济增长的影响。研究结果表明,灾害冲击具有严重的负面短期经济后果,财产增加,不平等加剧…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Robust Analysis of the Relationship between Natural Disasters, Electricity and Economic Growth in 41 Countries
(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)1. INTRODUCTIONNatural disasters are now better known. They are well investigated and mapped both locally and global scale. Natural disasters are liable to cause serious economic and social disruption. The immediate damage is decrease production, expenditures and the number of hours worked. According to the data reported by EM-DAT, Americas suffered in 2014 from 76 natural disasters and the damage reached US$ 25.8 billion. On the other side, Africa suffered from 39 natural disasters, a number far below its 2004-2013 annual average. According to EM-DAT (2014), the damages from natural disasters in European countries represent approximately US$ 7.8 billion.The occurrence of natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, storms and volcanic eruptions have negative effects on the electrical system operation. The earthquakes that have hit several countries such as China, Italy, Japan and the United States have severe impact economic, environmental and human. In addition, they destroyed their power system equipment.The response of the authorities has led in practice by the implementation of prevention and risk management systems evolving since the 1980s, resulting in an abundance of tools and acronyms that thwarts their ownership all players. In the period immediately following the event, reconstruction efforts are offset these losses and, paradoxically, create a net stimulatory effect on economic growth. To achieve this objective, it is necessary to measure or estimate economic costs of such disasters. In this sense, many studies have examined the debate in a macro-economic perspective by exploring how disasters affect real GDP per capita.In general, economic effects due to disasters can be classified into two categories: direct damage and indirect damage. The main findings shown that the direct effects of natural disasters depend on the level of development of the affected countries (Kahn, 2005).Most empirical studies have shown that natural disasters have a negative indirect damage in short-term, such as effects on economic growth (Noy, 2009; Fomby et al., 2013). Although long-term studies are still relatively rare and yet failed to provide consistent results (Skidmore and Toya, 2002; Noy and Nualsri, 2007; Jaramillo, 2009.).The contribution of this article is to assess the effects of natural disaster on economic growth, physical capital, labor and electricity. Furthermore, our study of literature suggests that few studies have examined the impact of natural disaster on the electricity. For this purpose, we use a Panel data and Granger causality-VECM model, including four types of disasters (earthquakes, storms, floods and droughts) in about 41 countries over the period 1990 to 2014.The sections of this paper presented as follows. The literature review section presents a brief literature review. The data section details the data used in the empirical part. The descriptive statistics and correlation matrix section summarizes the key statistics and correlation of the total variables. The model specification section describes the econometric method. The estimation methods and empirical results section discusses the empirical findings. Finally, conclusion and policy implications section.2. REVIEW OF THE RELEVANT LITERATURE2.1.Natural Disaster and Economic GrowthThere is a considerable attention in literature about the impact of natural disaster on economic growth. For instance, Albala-Bertrand (1993) investigated the effects of natural disaster on the economy and society in developing countries. He concluded that in reality disasters do not represent a problem for development. Benson (1997a, b, and c), Benson and Clay (1998, 2001) evaluated the impact of natural disasters on economic growth in some countries such as Fiji, Vietnam, Philippines, and Dominica. The findings showed that disasters shocks have a severe negative short-run economic consequence, with increase of property, and worsening inequalities. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of economic development
Journal of economic development Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Development (JED) promotes and encourages research that aim at economic development and growth by publishing papers of great scholarly merit on a wide range of topics and employing a wide range of approaches. JED welcomes both theoretical and empirical papers in the fields of economic development, economic growth, international trade and finance, labor economics, IO, social choice and political economics. JED also invites the economic analysis on the experiences of economic development in various dimensions from all the countries of the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信