智力残疾和犯罪行为:警察、地区检察官和法官的意识和关注

IF 0.5 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
E. Søndenaa, Terje Olsen, P. Kermit, Nina Christine Dahl, Robert Envik
{"title":"智力残疾和犯罪行为:警察、地区检察官和法官的意识和关注","authors":"E. Søndenaa, Terje Olsen, P. Kermit, Nina Christine Dahl, Robert Envik","doi":"10.1108/jidob-04-2019-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to examine the awareness of intellectual disabilities (ID) amongst professionals in the criminal justice system (CJS) and their knowledge of those persons, either as victims, witnesses, suspects, accused or defendants.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA survey of the professionals in the CJS (n=388), combined with a series of focus group interviews with experienced professionals (n=20), was conducted.\n\n\nFindings\nOne out of three respondents (police, district attorneys and judges) reported that they have regular contact with suspects who have an ID. Differences in knowledge of ID amongst professionals in the CJS can explain awareness and detection of persons with ID.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nNon-responders may represent professionals with no knowledge or less interest in these issues.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nReflections on ID have not previously been studied in the Norwegian CJS. The findings serve as a basis and status quo for further research.\n","PeriodicalId":43468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jidob-04-2019-0007","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intellectual disabilities and offending behaviour: the awareness and concerns of the police, district attorneys and judges\",\"authors\":\"E. Søndenaa, Terje Olsen, P. Kermit, Nina Christine Dahl, Robert Envik\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jidob-04-2019-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to examine the awareness of intellectual disabilities (ID) amongst professionals in the criminal justice system (CJS) and their knowledge of those persons, either as victims, witnesses, suspects, accused or defendants.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA survey of the professionals in the CJS (n=388), combined with a series of focus group interviews with experienced professionals (n=20), was conducted.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nOne out of three respondents (police, district attorneys and judges) reported that they have regular contact with suspects who have an ID. Differences in knowledge of ID amongst professionals in the CJS can explain awareness and detection of persons with ID.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nNon-responders may represent professionals with no knowledge or less interest in these issues.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nReflections on ID have not previously been studied in the Norwegian CJS. The findings serve as a basis and status quo for further research.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jidob-04-2019-0007\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jidob-04-2019-0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jidob-04-2019-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文的目的是研究刑事司法系统(CJS)专业人员对智力残疾(ID)的认识,以及他们对这些人的了解,无论是作为受害者、证人、嫌疑人、被告还是被告。设计/方法/方法对CJS的专业人员(n=388)进行了调查,并与有经验的专业人员(n=20)进行了一系列焦点小组访谈。调查结果三分之一的受访者(警察、地方检察官和法官)报告说,他们经常与有身份证的嫌疑人接触。CJS专业人员对ID知识的差异可以解释对ID患者的意识和检测。研究局限/意义无应答者可能代表对这些问题不了解或不感兴趣的专业人员。挪威CJS以前没有研究过对ID的反思。研究结果可作为进一步研究的基础和现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intellectual disabilities and offending behaviour: the awareness and concerns of the police, district attorneys and judges
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the awareness of intellectual disabilities (ID) amongst professionals in the criminal justice system (CJS) and their knowledge of those persons, either as victims, witnesses, suspects, accused or defendants. Design/methodology/approach A survey of the professionals in the CJS (n=388), combined with a series of focus group interviews with experienced professionals (n=20), was conducted. Findings One out of three respondents (police, district attorneys and judges) reported that they have regular contact with suspects who have an ID. Differences in knowledge of ID amongst professionals in the CJS can explain awareness and detection of persons with ID. Research limitations/implications Non-responders may represent professionals with no knowledge or less interest in these issues. Originality/value Reflections on ID have not previously been studied in the Norwegian CJS. The findings serve as a basis and status quo for further research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信