笛卡尔与苏格拉底论可能性与探究点

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
J. Templeman
{"title":"笛卡尔与苏格拉底论可能性与探究点","authors":"J. Templeman","doi":"10.1080/20563035.2019.1672990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Commentators have often noted ‘la présence latente du Ménon dans le cartésianisme’, but have not offered a sustained account of what this presence consists in. The author argues there exist strong parallels between Meno and the Recherche de la vérité, Descartes’ only extant dialogue, grounded partly in Descartes’ awareness of Plato's text. This parallel offers a useful approach to the Recherche. The first part of the article presents Meno and gives an outline of its reception. The second gives a reading of Descartes’ text. Since the concerns of the Recherche reflect arguments and approaches taken up in other texts like the Méditations, the author closes in the third part by suggesting the parallel allows us to say, more generally, that Descartes’ approach to inquiry, and to his fight with scholasticism, is a Socratic one.","PeriodicalId":40652,"journal":{"name":"Early Modern French Studies","volume":"41 1","pages":"126 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20563035.2019.1672990","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Descartes and Socrates on the Possibility and Point of Inquiry\",\"authors\":\"J. Templeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20563035.2019.1672990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Commentators have often noted ‘la présence latente du Ménon dans le cartésianisme’, but have not offered a sustained account of what this presence consists in. The author argues there exist strong parallels between Meno and the Recherche de la vérité, Descartes’ only extant dialogue, grounded partly in Descartes’ awareness of Plato's text. This parallel offers a useful approach to the Recherche. The first part of the article presents Meno and gives an outline of its reception. The second gives a reading of Descartes’ text. Since the concerns of the Recherche reflect arguments and approaches taken up in other texts like the Méditations, the author closes in the third part by suggesting the parallel allows us to say, more generally, that Descartes’ approach to inquiry, and to his fight with scholasticism, is a Socratic one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Modern French Studies\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"126 - 143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20563035.2019.1672990\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Modern French Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20563035.2019.1672990\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Modern French Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20563035.2019.1672990","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

评论家们经常注意到“la pracimsence latente du msamnon dans le carsamsianisme”,但并没有提供一个持续的解释,说明这种存在是什么。作者认为,Meno和笛卡尔唯一现存的对话Recherche de la vsamri之间存在着强烈的相似之处,部分基于笛卡尔对柏拉图文本的认识。这种对比为研究提供了一种有用的方法。文章的第一部分介绍了Meno,并概述了它的接受情况。第二部分是对笛卡尔文本的解读。由于《研究》的关注反映了其他文本中所采用的论点和方法,如《m.m.acimditations》,作者在第三部分的结尾处提出,这种相似之处允许我们说,更一般地说,笛卡尔的探究方法,以及他与经院哲学的斗争,是一种苏格拉底式的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Descartes and Socrates on the Possibility and Point of Inquiry
Commentators have often noted ‘la présence latente du Ménon dans le cartésianisme’, but have not offered a sustained account of what this presence consists in. The author argues there exist strong parallels between Meno and the Recherche de la vérité, Descartes’ only extant dialogue, grounded partly in Descartes’ awareness of Plato's text. This parallel offers a useful approach to the Recherche. The first part of the article presents Meno and gives an outline of its reception. The second gives a reading of Descartes’ text. Since the concerns of the Recherche reflect arguments and approaches taken up in other texts like the Méditations, the author closes in the third part by suggesting the parallel allows us to say, more generally, that Descartes’ approach to inquiry, and to his fight with scholasticism, is a Socratic one.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Early Modern French Studies (formerly Seventeenth-Century French Studies) publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original articles in English and French on a broad range of literary, cultural, methodological, and theoretical topics relating to the study of early modern France. The journal has expanded its historical scope and now covers work on the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries. Within this period of French literary and cultural history, the journal particularly welcomes work that relates to the term ''early modern'', as well as work that interrogates it. It continues to publish special issues devoted to particular topics (such as the highly successful 2014 special issue on the cultural history of fans) as well as individual submissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信