自动驾驶汽车的多智能体强化学习研究

Joris Dinneweth, Abderrahmane Boubezoul, René Mandiau, Stéphane Espié
{"title":"自动驾驶汽车的多智能体强化学习研究","authors":"Joris Dinneweth,&nbsp;Abderrahmane Boubezoul,&nbsp;René Mandiau,&nbsp;Stéphane Espié","doi":"10.1007/s43684-022-00045-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the near future, autonomous vehicles (AVs) may cohabit with human drivers in mixed traffic. This cohabitation raises serious challenges, both in terms of traffic flow and individual mobility, as well as from the road safety point of view. Mixed traffic may fail to fulfill expected security requirements due to the heterogeneity and unpredictability of human drivers, and autonomous cars could then monopolize the traffic. Using multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) algorithms, researchers have attempted to design autonomous vehicles for both scenarios, and this paper investigates their recent advances. We focus on articles tackling decision-making problems and identify four paradigms. While some authors address mixed traffic problems with or without social-desirable AVs, others tackle the case of fully-autonomous traffic. While the latter case is essentially a communication problem, most authors addressing the mixed traffic admit some limitations. The current human driver models found in the literature are too simplistic since they do not cover the heterogeneity of the drivers’ behaviors. As a result, they fail to generalize over the wide range of possible behaviors. For each paper investigated, we analyze how the authors formulated the MARL problem in terms of observation, action, and rewards to match the paradigm they apply.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":71187,"journal":{"name":"自主智能系统(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43684-022-00045-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-agent reinforcement learning for autonomous vehicles: a survey\",\"authors\":\"Joris Dinneweth,&nbsp;Abderrahmane Boubezoul,&nbsp;René Mandiau,&nbsp;Stéphane Espié\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43684-022-00045-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the near future, autonomous vehicles (AVs) may cohabit with human drivers in mixed traffic. This cohabitation raises serious challenges, both in terms of traffic flow and individual mobility, as well as from the road safety point of view. Mixed traffic may fail to fulfill expected security requirements due to the heterogeneity and unpredictability of human drivers, and autonomous cars could then monopolize the traffic. Using multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) algorithms, researchers have attempted to design autonomous vehicles for both scenarios, and this paper investigates their recent advances. We focus on articles tackling decision-making problems and identify four paradigms. While some authors address mixed traffic problems with or without social-desirable AVs, others tackle the case of fully-autonomous traffic. While the latter case is essentially a communication problem, most authors addressing the mixed traffic admit some limitations. The current human driver models found in the literature are too simplistic since they do not cover the heterogeneity of the drivers’ behaviors. As a result, they fail to generalize over the wide range of possible behaviors. For each paper investigated, we analyze how the authors formulated the MARL problem in terms of observation, action, and rewards to match the paradigm they apply.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":71187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"自主智能系统(英文)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43684-022-00045-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"自主智能系统(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1093\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43684-022-00045-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"自主智能系统(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43684-022-00045-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在不久的将来,自动驾驶汽车(AV)可能会与人类驾驶员在混合交通中共存。无论是从交通流量和个人机动性的角度,还是从道路安全的角度来看,这种共存都会带来严峻的挑战。由于人类驾驶员的异质性和不可预测性,混合交通可能无法满足预期的安全要求,而自动驾驶汽车则可能垄断交通。研究人员已经尝试使用多代理强化学习(MARL)算法来设计这两种情况下的自动驾驶汽车,本文将对其最新进展进行研究。我们重点关注解决决策问题的文章,并确定了四种范式。一些作者研究了有无社会理想自动驾驶汽车的混合交通问题,另一些则研究了完全自动驾驶的交通问题。虽然后一种情况本质上是一个沟通问题,但大多数研究混合交通问题的作者都承认存在一些局限性。目前文献中的人类驾驶员模型过于简单,因为它们没有涵盖驾驶员行为的异质性。因此,这些模型无法概括各种可能的行为。对于所调查的每篇论文,我们都分析了作者是如何从观察、行动和奖励的角度来制定 MARL 问题的,以便与他们所应用的范式相匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-agent reinforcement learning for autonomous vehicles: a survey

In the near future, autonomous vehicles (AVs) may cohabit with human drivers in mixed traffic. This cohabitation raises serious challenges, both in terms of traffic flow and individual mobility, as well as from the road safety point of view. Mixed traffic may fail to fulfill expected security requirements due to the heterogeneity and unpredictability of human drivers, and autonomous cars could then monopolize the traffic. Using multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) algorithms, researchers have attempted to design autonomous vehicles for both scenarios, and this paper investigates their recent advances. We focus on articles tackling decision-making problems and identify four paradigms. While some authors address mixed traffic problems with or without social-desirable AVs, others tackle the case of fully-autonomous traffic. While the latter case is essentially a communication problem, most authors addressing the mixed traffic admit some limitations. The current human driver models found in the literature are too simplistic since they do not cover the heterogeneity of the drivers’ behaviors. As a result, they fail to generalize over the wide range of possible behaviors. For each paper investigated, we analyze how the authors formulated the MARL problem in terms of observation, action, and rewards to match the paradigm they apply.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信