维里亚木与殖民档案:反主流解读?沿着谷地?读它!

Q1 Arts and Humanities
A. Zeman
{"title":"维里亚木与殖民档案:反主流解读?沿着谷地?读它!","authors":"A. Zeman","doi":"10.1017/hia.2023.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n “The archives are silent.” The starting point of this article is the alleged non-existence of archival sources on the Portuguese massacre of Wiriyamu (1972). The article proves this claim to be false and shows how the available sources can be used to improve our knowledge of the massacre. The article suggests that scholars’ ignorance of these sources is connected to general misconceptions about colonial archives and their alleged silence on wartime atrocities, which are based on the belief that such atrocities do only appear in the sources, if they are read against the grain. Revealing the explicit presence of war atrocities in the sources, the article argues that the legitimate concern about reading such sources against the grain should not prevent us from reading them at all.","PeriodicalId":39318,"journal":{"name":"History in Africa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wiriyamu and the Colonial Archive: Reading It Against the Grain? Along the Grain? Read It at All!\",\"authors\":\"A. Zeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/hia.2023.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n “The archives are silent.” The starting point of this article is the alleged non-existence of archival sources on the Portuguese massacre of Wiriyamu (1972). The article proves this claim to be false and shows how the available sources can be used to improve our knowledge of the massacre. The article suggests that scholars’ ignorance of these sources is connected to general misconceptions about colonial archives and their alleged silence on wartime atrocities, which are based on the belief that such atrocities do only appear in the sources, if they are read against the grain. Revealing the explicit presence of war atrocities in the sources, the article argues that the legitimate concern about reading such sources against the grain should not prevent us from reading them at all.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History in Africa\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History in Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/hia.2023.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/hia.2023.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“档案是沉默的。”这篇文章的出发点是,据称葡萄牙屠杀维里亚姆(1972年)的档案来源不存在。这篇文章证明了这一说法是错误的,并展示了如何利用现有的来源来提高我们对大屠杀的了解。这篇文章表明,学者们对这些来源的无知与对殖民档案的普遍误解以及他们对战时暴行的沉默有关,这些误解是基于这样一种信念,即这些暴行只有在违背初衷的情况下才会出现在来源中。文章揭示了战争暴行在来源中的明确存在,认为对阅读这些来源的合理担忧根本不应该阻止我们阅读它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wiriyamu and the Colonial Archive: Reading It Against the Grain? Along the Grain? Read It at All!
“The archives are silent.” The starting point of this article is the alleged non-existence of archival sources on the Portuguese massacre of Wiriyamu (1972). The article proves this claim to be false and shows how the available sources can be used to improve our knowledge of the massacre. The article suggests that scholars’ ignorance of these sources is connected to general misconceptions about colonial archives and their alleged silence on wartime atrocities, which are based on the belief that such atrocities do only appear in the sources, if they are read against the grain. Revealing the explicit presence of war atrocities in the sources, the article argues that the legitimate concern about reading such sources against the grain should not prevent us from reading them at all.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
History in Africa
History in Africa Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信