强制性教学方法扼杀创新:反对

L. Baehaqi
{"title":"强制性教学方法扼杀创新:反对","authors":"L. Baehaqi","doi":"10.23971/jefl.v12i1.3837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the primacy of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) in research and pedagogy on second language (L2) writing in Indonesia. Indonesian academics use SFL theory as a shell to value arguments and observations in the methodological literature of L2 writing, demonstrating how the theory transforms into an \"instrument reliable for scaffolding thinking, for propelling knowledge and ideas forward\" (Thomas, 2007, p. 44) in their research and practice. The hijacking of an educational researcher's thought process and methodology by a linguistic paradigm serves only to reinforce the researchers' lack of confidence in challenging the established and recognized paradigm. Numerous articles from reputable local publications were gathered and analyzed. The paper concludes that researchers working in Indonesiashould commit to conducting more thought experiments to learn and support critical refection over and above imitating “what has been\". Reflection and consideration of interdisciplinary evidence help make a unique contribution to educational theory and practice.","PeriodicalId":31243,"journal":{"name":"Journal on English as a Foreign Language","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mandating teaching approaches stifles innovation: a case against\",\"authors\":\"L. Baehaqi\",\"doi\":\"10.23971/jefl.v12i1.3837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses the primacy of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) in research and pedagogy on second language (L2) writing in Indonesia. Indonesian academics use SFL theory as a shell to value arguments and observations in the methodological literature of L2 writing, demonstrating how the theory transforms into an \\\"instrument reliable for scaffolding thinking, for propelling knowledge and ideas forward\\\" (Thomas, 2007, p. 44) in their research and practice. The hijacking of an educational researcher's thought process and methodology by a linguistic paradigm serves only to reinforce the researchers' lack of confidence in challenging the established and recognized paradigm. Numerous articles from reputable local publications were gathered and analyzed. The paper concludes that researchers working in Indonesiashould commit to conducting more thought experiments to learn and support critical refection over and above imitating “what has been\\\". Reflection and consideration of interdisciplinary evidence help make a unique contribution to educational theory and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal on English as a Foreign Language\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal on English as a Foreign Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v12i1.3837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on English as a Foreign Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v12i1.3837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了系统功能语言学(SFL)在印度尼西亚第二语言写作研究和教学中的首要地位。印度尼西亚学者使用SFL理论作为一个外壳来评估第二语言写作方法论文献中的论点和观察,展示了该理论如何在他们的研究和实践中转变为“支架思维的可靠工具,推动知识和思想向前发展”(托马斯,2007年,第44页)。语言范式劫持教育研究者的思维过程和方法论,只会使研究者更加缺乏挑战既定和公认范式的信心。收集并分析了来自当地知名出版物的大量文章。这篇论文的结论是,在印尼工作的科学家应该致力于进行更多的思维实验,以学习和支持批判性反思,而不是模仿“已经发生的事情”。反思和考虑跨学科证据有助于对教育理论和实践做出独特的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mandating teaching approaches stifles innovation: a case against
The article discusses the primacy of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) in research and pedagogy on second language (L2) writing in Indonesia. Indonesian academics use SFL theory as a shell to value arguments and observations in the methodological literature of L2 writing, demonstrating how the theory transforms into an "instrument reliable for scaffolding thinking, for propelling knowledge and ideas forward" (Thomas, 2007, p. 44) in their research and practice. The hijacking of an educational researcher's thought process and methodology by a linguistic paradigm serves only to reinforce the researchers' lack of confidence in challenging the established and recognized paradigm. Numerous articles from reputable local publications were gathered and analyzed. The paper concludes that researchers working in Indonesiashould commit to conducting more thought experiments to learn and support critical refection over and above imitating “what has been". Reflection and consideration of interdisciplinary evidence help make a unique contribution to educational theory and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信