逃避透明，怀疑民主，梦想远大:俄罗斯基层对科学治理的看法

IF 1.9 2区社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Problems of Post-Communism Pub Date : 2022-05-16 DOI:10.1080/10758216.2022.2066006

Artyom Kosmarski, V. Kartavtsev, Alexander Odintsov

{"title":"逃避透明，怀疑民主，梦想远大:俄罗斯基层对科学治理的看法","authors":"Artyom Kosmarski, V. Kartavtsev, Alexander Odintsov","doi":"10.1080/10758216.2022.2066006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Global transformation of academia under “new public management” and metrics-based assessment has brought forth intense debates on the governance of science. This study investigates key values and visions of academic governance in Russia through a set of focus groups with scientists plus a nationwide survey (n = 6,166) conducted in 2019. Russian scholars defy both state pressures and grassroots self-governance (due to fundamental distrust of peers); the preservation of privacy is their key concern. Finally, we present basic self-images of science (competitive, cooperative, and mobilizational) and point out the tensions between liberalism and democracy in post-Soviet academia.","PeriodicalId":46824,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Post-Communism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evading Transparency, Doubting Democracy, Dreaming Big: Grassroots Perspectives on Science Governance in Russia\",\"authors\":\"Artyom Kosmarski, V. Kartavtsev, Alexander Odintsov\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10758216.2022.2066006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Global transformation of academia under “new public management” and metrics-based assessment has brought forth intense debates on the governance of science. This study investigates key values and visions of academic governance in Russia through a set of focus groups with scientists plus a nationwide survey (n = 6,166) conducted in 2019. Russian scholars defy both state pressures and grassroots self-governance (due to fundamental distrust of peers); the preservation of privacy is their key concern. Finally, we present basic self-images of science (competitive, cooperative, and mobilizational) and point out the tensions between liberalism and democracy in post-Soviet academia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problems of Post-Communism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problems of Post-Communism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2022.2066006\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Post-Communism","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2022.2066006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在“新公共管理”和基于指标的评估下，学术界的全球转型引发了关于科学治理的激烈争论。这项研究通过一组由科学家组成的焦点小组，以及2019年进行的一项全国性调查（n=6166），调查了俄罗斯学术治理的关键价值观和愿景。俄罗斯学者无视国家压力和基层自治（由于对同行的根本不信任）；保护隐私是他们最关心的问题。最后，我们提出了科学的基本自我形象（竞争、合作和动员），并指出了后苏联学术界自由主义与民主之间的紧张关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Evading Transparency, Doubting Democracy, Dreaming Big: Grassroots Perspectives on Science Governance in Russia

ABSTRACT Global transformation of academia under “new public management” and metrics-based assessment has brought forth intense debates on the governance of science. This study investigates key values and visions of academic governance in Russia through a set of focus groups with scientists plus a nationwide survey (n = 6,166) conducted in 2019. Russian scholars defy both state pressures and grassroots self-governance (due to fundamental distrust of peers); the preservation of privacy is their key concern. Finally, we present basic self-images of science (competitive, cooperative, and mobilizational) and point out the tensions between liberalism and democracy in post-Soviet academia.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Problems of Post-Communism POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： The post-communist countries are the most rapidly changing societies of Europe and Asia. For insight into this twenty-first century revolution, there is no better source than Problems of Post-Communism. Emphasis is placed on timely research covering current economic, political, security, and international developments and trends in Russia and China, Central Europe and Central Asia, Latin America, and Southeast Asia. Clarity and readability make the articles fully accessible to researchers, policy makers, and students alike.