#慢性疼痛:使用机器学习从推特自动构建慢性疼痛队列

Health data science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-04 DOI:10.34133/hds.0078
Abeed Sarker, Sahithi Lakamana, Yuting Guo, Yao Ge, Abimbola Leslie, Omolola Okunromade, Elena Gonzalez-Polledo, Jeanmarie Perrone, Anne Marie McKenzie-Brown
{"title":"#慢性疼痛:使用机器学习从推特自动构建慢性疼痛队列","authors":"Abeed Sarker, Sahithi Lakamana, Yuting Guo, Yao Ge, Abimbola Leslie, Omolola Okunromade, Elena Gonzalez-Polledo, Jeanmarie Perrone, Anne Marie McKenzie-Brown","doi":"10.34133/hds.0078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to the high burden of chronic pain, and the detrimental public health consequences of its treatment with opioids, there is a high-priority need to identify effective alternative therapies. Social media is a potentially valuable resource for knowledge about self-reported therapies by chronic pain sufferers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We attempted to (a) verify the presence of large-scale chronic pain-related chatter on Twitter, (b) develop natural language processing and machine learning methods for automatically detecting self-disclosures, (c) collect longitudinal data posted by them, and (d) semiautomatically analyze the types of chronic pain-related information reported by them. We collected data using chronic pain-related hashtags and keywords and manually annotated 4,998 posts to indicate if they were self-reports of chronic pain experiences. We trained and evaluated several state-of-the-art supervised text classification models and deployed the best-performing classifier. We collected all publicly available posts from detected cohort members and conducted manual and natural language processing-driven descriptive analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interannotator agreement for the binary annotation was 0.82 (Cohen's kappa). The RoBERTa model performed best (F<sub>1</sub> score: 0.84; 95% confidence interval: 0.80 to 0.89), and we used this model to classify all collected unlabeled posts. We discovered 22,795 self-reported chronic pain sufferers and collected over 3 million of their past posts. Further analyses revealed information about, but not limited to, alternative treatments, patient sentiments about treatments, side effects, and self-management strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our social media based approach will result in an automatically growing large cohort over time, and the data can be leveraged to identify effective opioid-alternative therapies for diverse chronic pain types.</p>","PeriodicalId":73207,"journal":{"name":"Health data science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10852024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"#ChronicPain: Automated Building of a Chronic Pain Cohort from Twitter Using Machine Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Abeed Sarker, Sahithi Lakamana, Yuting Guo, Yao Ge, Abimbola Leslie, Omolola Okunromade, Elena Gonzalez-Polledo, Jeanmarie Perrone, Anne Marie McKenzie-Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.34133/hds.0078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to the high burden of chronic pain, and the detrimental public health consequences of its treatment with opioids, there is a high-priority need to identify effective alternative therapies. Social media is a potentially valuable resource for knowledge about self-reported therapies by chronic pain sufferers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We attempted to (a) verify the presence of large-scale chronic pain-related chatter on Twitter, (b) develop natural language processing and machine learning methods for automatically detecting self-disclosures, (c) collect longitudinal data posted by them, and (d) semiautomatically analyze the types of chronic pain-related information reported by them. We collected data using chronic pain-related hashtags and keywords and manually annotated 4,998 posts to indicate if they were self-reports of chronic pain experiences. We trained and evaluated several state-of-the-art supervised text classification models and deployed the best-performing classifier. We collected all publicly available posts from detected cohort members and conducted manual and natural language processing-driven descriptive analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interannotator agreement for the binary annotation was 0.82 (Cohen's kappa). The RoBERTa model performed best (F<sub>1</sub> score: 0.84; 95% confidence interval: 0.80 to 0.89), and we used this model to classify all collected unlabeled posts. We discovered 22,795 self-reported chronic pain sufferers and collected over 3 million of their past posts. Further analyses revealed information about, but not limited to, alternative treatments, patient sentiments about treatments, side effects, and self-management strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our social media based approach will result in an automatically growing large cohort over time, and the data can be leveraged to identify effective opioid-alternative therapies for diverse chronic pain types.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health data science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10852024/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health data science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34133/hds.0078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health data science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34133/hds.0078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于慢性疼痛的高负担,以及用阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的有害公共卫生后果,需要高度优先确定有效的替代疗法。社交媒体是了解慢性疼痛患者自我报告治疗方法的潜在宝贵资源。方法:我们试图(a)验证Twitter上是否存在大规模的慢性疼痛相关聊天,(b)开发自然语言处理和机器学习方法来自动检测自我披露,(c)收集他们发布的纵向数据,(d)半自动分析他们报告的慢性疼痛相关信息类型。我们使用与慢性疼痛相关的标签和关键词收集数据,并手动注释4,998篇文章,以表明它们是否是慢性疼痛经历的自我报告。我们训练和评估了几个最先进的监督文本分类模型,并部署了性能最好的分类器。我们从检测到的队列成员中收集了所有公开可用的帖子,并进行了手动和自然语言处理驱动的描述性分析。结果:二元标注间的一致性为0.82 (Cohen’s kappa)。RoBERTa模型表现最佳(f1得分:0.84;95%置信区间:0.80 ~ 0.89),我们使用该模型对所有收集到的未标记帖子进行分类。我们发现了22795名自我报告的慢性疼痛患者,并收集了超过300万份他们过去的帖子。进一步的分析揭示了有关但不限于替代治疗、患者对治疗的看法、副作用和自我管理策略的信息。结论:随着时间的推移,我们基于社交媒体的方法将导致一个自动增长的大队列,数据可以用来确定有效的阿片类药物替代疗法,用于治疗各种慢性疼痛类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
#ChronicPain: Automated Building of a Chronic Pain Cohort from Twitter Using Machine Learning.

Background: Due to the high burden of chronic pain, and the detrimental public health consequences of its treatment with opioids, there is a high-priority need to identify effective alternative therapies. Social media is a potentially valuable resource for knowledge about self-reported therapies by chronic pain sufferers.

Methods: We attempted to (a) verify the presence of large-scale chronic pain-related chatter on Twitter, (b) develop natural language processing and machine learning methods for automatically detecting self-disclosures, (c) collect longitudinal data posted by them, and (d) semiautomatically analyze the types of chronic pain-related information reported by them. We collected data using chronic pain-related hashtags and keywords and manually annotated 4,998 posts to indicate if they were self-reports of chronic pain experiences. We trained and evaluated several state-of-the-art supervised text classification models and deployed the best-performing classifier. We collected all publicly available posts from detected cohort members and conducted manual and natural language processing-driven descriptive analyses.

Results: Interannotator agreement for the binary annotation was 0.82 (Cohen's kappa). The RoBERTa model performed best (F1 score: 0.84; 95% confidence interval: 0.80 to 0.89), and we used this model to classify all collected unlabeled posts. We discovered 22,795 self-reported chronic pain sufferers and collected over 3 million of their past posts. Further analyses revealed information about, but not limited to, alternative treatments, patient sentiments about treatments, side effects, and self-management strategies.

Conclusion: Our social media based approach will result in an automatically growing large cohort over time, and the data can be leveraged to identify effective opioid-alternative therapies for diverse chronic pain types.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信