黑海地区北约盟国话语中的稳定性、模糊性和变化:以罗马尼亚、保加利亚和土耳其为例

IF 0.9 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Croatian International Relations Review Pub Date : 2017-11-02 DOI:10.1515/cirr-2017-0025

Valentín Naumescu

{"title":"黑海地区北约盟国话语中的稳定性、模糊性和变化:以罗马尼亚、保加利亚和土耳其为例","authors":"Valentín Naumescu","doi":"10.1515/cirr-2017-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Shortly after the Crimea crisis of March 2014, NATO started a process of strategic reflection and a series of actions under the umbrella of the ‘Pivot to East’. On the South of its Eastern flank, the Black Sea region looms as one of the most unstable areas, with a number of frozen conflicts in non-NATO countries as well as an increasing unrest overall. This article explores the political discourses, commitments and attitudes towards NATO of the three allies at the Black Sea, namely Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey, as well as exploring their role in regional security. The purpose of the research is to compare NATO’s representation in the mainstream politics of these countries. Based on discourse analysis and the comparative method, the paper examines to what extent stability, ambiguity and change are present in the Southeast allies’ discourses on NATO.","PeriodicalId":35243,"journal":{"name":"Croatian International Relations Review","volume":"23 1","pages":"187 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/cirr-2017-0025","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability, Ambiguity and Change in the Discourses of NATO allies in the Black Sea region: The Cases of Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey\",\"authors\":\"Valentín Naumescu\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cirr-2017-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Shortly after the Crimea crisis of March 2014, NATO started a process of strategic reflection and a series of actions under the umbrella of the ‘Pivot to East’. On the South of its Eastern flank, the Black Sea region looms as one of the most unstable areas, with a number of frozen conflicts in non-NATO countries as well as an increasing unrest overall. This article explores the political discourses, commitments and attitudes towards NATO of the three allies at the Black Sea, namely Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey, as well as exploring their role in regional security. The purpose of the research is to compare NATO’s representation in the mainstream politics of these countries. Based on discourse analysis and the comparative method, the paper examines to what extent stability, ambiguity and change are present in the Southeast allies’ discourses on NATO.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian International Relations Review\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"187 - 209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/cirr-2017-0025\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian International Relations Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian International Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

2014年3月克里米亚危机爆发后不久，北约开始在“转向东方”的框架下进行战略反思和一系列行动。在其东翼的南部，黑海地区是最不稳定的地区之一，在非北约国家发生了许多冻结的冲突，而且总体上的动荡日益加剧。本文探讨了黑海三国罗马尼亚、保加利亚和土耳其对北约的政治话语、承诺和态度，以及它们在地区安全中的作用。本研究的目的是比较北约在这些国家的主流政治中的代表性。本文运用话语分析和比较方法，考察了东南盟国关于北约的话语中存在的稳定性、模糊性和变动性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Stability, Ambiguity and Change in the Discourses of NATO allies in the Black Sea region: The Cases of Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey

Abstract Shortly after the Crimea crisis of March 2014, NATO started a process of strategic reflection and a series of actions under the umbrella of the ‘Pivot to East’. On the South of its Eastern flank, the Black Sea region looms as one of the most unstable areas, with a number of frozen conflicts in non-NATO countries as well as an increasing unrest overall. This article explores the political discourses, commitments and attitudes towards NATO of the three allies at the Black Sea, namely Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey, as well as exploring their role in regional security. The purpose of the research is to compare NATO’s representation in the mainstream politics of these countries. Based on discourse analysis and the comparative method, the paper examines to what extent stability, ambiguity and change are present in the Southeast allies’ discourses on NATO.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Croatian International Relations Review Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

17 weeks

期刊介绍： The Croatian International Relations Review (CIRR) is an interdisciplinary academic journal published in English since 1995 and focuses on political science, sociology, law and economics. Each issue includes scholarly, double-blind peer reviewed articles, and book reviews. CIRR is a member of COPE – Committee on Publication Ethics – and is published electronically by the Institute for Development and International Relations (IRMO) in Zagreb. The journal is supported by the Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Croatia and is published in collaboration with De Gruyter Open, the world’s second largest publisher of Open Access academic content. CIRR is indexed by 40 scholarly databases, including ESCI, Scopus, Erih Plus, EconLit and Proquest Social Science Premium Collection. Articles reflect the views of their authors only.