多焦点公正气候对团队心理授权的交互影响

Q4 Psychology
Zoran Sušanj, Ana Jakopec, Antonija Radoš
{"title":"多焦点公正气候对团队心理授权的交互影响","authors":"Zoran Sušanj, Ana Jakopec, Antonija Radoš","doi":"10.21465/2019-SP-221-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychological empowerment refers to the degree in which an employee feels that he controls events in the organization. This construct is studied on a group level as well, as a team members’ common experience. Team empowerment is a multidimensional construct that includes the collective belief about freedom, independence and discretion in decision-making (autonomy), teams’ effectiveness (potency), the importance and value of teams’ work (meaningfulness), and the contribution of the teams’ work to organizational performance (impact). Organizations are interested in empowering individuals and teams because empowerment relates to positive work outcomes. Justice climate, as an important component of the overall experience of the working environment, greatly determines psychological empowerment. The aim of this study is to verify the interactive effects of organizational, supervisory and peer justice climate on teams’ psychological empowerment. We analyzed data collected from 196 work teams from different organizations. Results of polynomial regression combined with response surface methodology show that with the increase of the level of congruence between multi-foci justice climates, teams’ psychological empowerment increases as well. Misalignment between different sources of justice climate, a situation in which one source is fair while the other is unfair, does not affect the team members’ joint perception of psychological empowerment. As long as the team perceives one source of justice as fair, the teams’ psychological empowerment is high, regardless of the injustice of another source. Although the cross- sectional study design does not allow inferring causality, the theoretical implications of the results for the application of the congruence theory in the organizational context in understanding the effects of (mis)alignment between different sources of justice climate, as well as the practical applicability of the results in human resource management, are discussed. Keywords: teams’ psychological empowerment, multi-foci justice climate","PeriodicalId":35108,"journal":{"name":"Suvremena Psihologija","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interactive Effects of Multi-Foci Justice Climates on Teams’ Psychological Empowerment\",\"authors\":\"Zoran Sušanj, Ana Jakopec, Antonija Radoš\",\"doi\":\"10.21465/2019-SP-221-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Psychological empowerment refers to the degree in which an employee feels that he controls events in the organization. This construct is studied on a group level as well, as a team members’ common experience. Team empowerment is a multidimensional construct that includes the collective belief about freedom, independence and discretion in decision-making (autonomy), teams’ effectiveness (potency), the importance and value of teams’ work (meaningfulness), and the contribution of the teams’ work to organizational performance (impact). Organizations are interested in empowering individuals and teams because empowerment relates to positive work outcomes. Justice climate, as an important component of the overall experience of the working environment, greatly determines psychological empowerment. The aim of this study is to verify the interactive effects of organizational, supervisory and peer justice climate on teams’ psychological empowerment. We analyzed data collected from 196 work teams from different organizations. Results of polynomial regression combined with response surface methodology show that with the increase of the level of congruence between multi-foci justice climates, teams’ psychological empowerment increases as well. Misalignment between different sources of justice climate, a situation in which one source is fair while the other is unfair, does not affect the team members’ joint perception of psychological empowerment. As long as the team perceives one source of justice as fair, the teams’ psychological empowerment is high, regardless of the injustice of another source. Although the cross- sectional study design does not allow inferring causality, the theoretical implications of the results for the application of the congruence theory in the organizational context in understanding the effects of (mis)alignment between different sources of justice climate, as well as the practical applicability of the results in human resource management, are discussed. Keywords: teams’ psychological empowerment, multi-foci justice climate\",\"PeriodicalId\":35108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Suvremena Psihologija\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Suvremena Psihologija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21465/2019-SP-221-02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suvremena Psihologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21465/2019-SP-221-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

心理授权是指员工感觉自己控制组织中事件的程度。这种结构也在团队层面上进行了研究,作为团队成员的共同经验。团队赋权是一个多维的结构,包括关于决策自由、独立和自由裁量权(自主性)、团队有效性(效力)、团队工作的重要性和价值(意义)以及团队工作对组织绩效的贡献(影响)的集体信念。组织对赋予个人和团队权力感兴趣,因为赋予权力与积极的工作成果有关。公正氛围作为工作环境整体体验的重要组成部分,在很大程度上决定了心理赋权。本研究的目的是验证组织、监督和同伴公正氛围对团队心理赋权的互动效应。我们分析了从不同组织的196个工作团队收集的数据。多项式回归与响应面方法相结合的结果表明,随着多焦点司法氛围一致性水平的提高,团队的心理赋权也在增加。不同来源的司法氛围不一致,即一个来源是公平的,而另一个来源不公平的情况,不会影响团队成员对心理赋权的共同感知。只要团队认为正义的一个来源是公平的,团队的心理赋权就很高,而不考虑另一个来源的不公正。尽管跨部门研究设计不允许推断因果关系,但讨论了研究结果对在组织背景下应用一致性理论理解不同司法氛围来源之间(不一致)的影响的理论意义,以及研究结果在人力资源管理中的实际适用性。关键词:团队心理赋权、多焦点司法氛围
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interactive Effects of Multi-Foci Justice Climates on Teams’ Psychological Empowerment
Psychological empowerment refers to the degree in which an employee feels that he controls events in the organization. This construct is studied on a group level as well, as a team members’ common experience. Team empowerment is a multidimensional construct that includes the collective belief about freedom, independence and discretion in decision-making (autonomy), teams’ effectiveness (potency), the importance and value of teams’ work (meaningfulness), and the contribution of the teams’ work to organizational performance (impact). Organizations are interested in empowering individuals and teams because empowerment relates to positive work outcomes. Justice climate, as an important component of the overall experience of the working environment, greatly determines psychological empowerment. The aim of this study is to verify the interactive effects of organizational, supervisory and peer justice climate on teams’ psychological empowerment. We analyzed data collected from 196 work teams from different organizations. Results of polynomial regression combined with response surface methodology show that with the increase of the level of congruence between multi-foci justice climates, teams’ psychological empowerment increases as well. Misalignment between different sources of justice climate, a situation in which one source is fair while the other is unfair, does not affect the team members’ joint perception of psychological empowerment. As long as the team perceives one source of justice as fair, the teams’ psychological empowerment is high, regardless of the injustice of another source. Although the cross- sectional study design does not allow inferring causality, the theoretical implications of the results for the application of the congruence theory in the organizational context in understanding the effects of (mis)alignment between different sources of justice climate, as well as the practical applicability of the results in human resource management, are discussed. Keywords: teams’ psychological empowerment, multi-foci justice climate
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Suvremena Psihologija
Suvremena Psihologija Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信