年轻食管癌患者:年龄是否影响治疗过程和结果?

Ethan Y. Song, S. Naffouje, Sabrina Saeed, A. Glaser, Miles E. Cameron, J. Fontaine, L. Peña, M. Friedman, R. Mehta, Sarah Hoffe, J. Frakes, J. Pimiento
{"title":"年轻食管癌患者:年龄是否影响治疗过程和结果?","authors":"Ethan Y. Song, S. Naffouje, Sabrina Saeed, A. Glaser, Miles E. Cameron, J. Fontaine, L. Peña, M. Friedman, R. Mehta, Sarah Hoffe, J. Frakes, J. Pimiento","doi":"10.21037/AOE-20-92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Young patients with esophageal cancer (EC) are believed to have more aggressive disease, thus thought to have worse survival. Herein, we aim to study the impact of younger age on the short- and long-term outcomes of esophagectomy for EC. Methods: Patients who underwent esophagectomy for EC at our institution between 1994–2019 were included. Age 50 was defined as the cutoff for “young” vs . “old”. Patients from each age group were propensity-score matched 1:1 to compare postoperative and survival outcomes. Results: Our database reported 1,031 patients, 112 of whom were in the ‘young’ group. For the unmatched analysis, young patients were more likely to have squamous cell carcinoma, higher rates of locally advanced disease, and subsequently higher rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (79.5% vs . 68.3%; P=0.047). After matching for pre-treatment clinical factors, young patients were less likely to have pulmonary or cardiac complications after surgery, and three times more likely to receive AC despite matching for stage and response to treatment (26.7% vs . 7.9%; P=0.002). Then, we matched patients including receipt of AC to study survival. In the second match, median recurrence-free survival (RFS) for young patients was 49.0±26.0 vs . old 27.0±5.4 months (P=0.215). Median overall survival (OS) for young was 73.0±28.9 vs . old 31.0±6.3 months (P=0.073). Conclusions: Young EC patients tend to present with more advanced disease. However, when matched for stage and response to therapies, young patients were three-times more likely to be offered AC. After adjusting for receipt of adjuvant therapy no difference was detected in RFS.","PeriodicalId":72217,"journal":{"name":"Annals of esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Esophageal cancer in young patients: does age affect treatment course and outcomes?\",\"authors\":\"Ethan Y. Song, S. Naffouje, Sabrina Saeed, A. Glaser, Miles E. Cameron, J. Fontaine, L. Peña, M. Friedman, R. Mehta, Sarah Hoffe, J. Frakes, J. Pimiento\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/AOE-20-92\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Young patients with esophageal cancer (EC) are believed to have more aggressive disease, thus thought to have worse survival. Herein, we aim to study the impact of younger age on the short- and long-term outcomes of esophagectomy for EC. Methods: Patients who underwent esophagectomy for EC at our institution between 1994–2019 were included. Age 50 was defined as the cutoff for “young” vs . “old”. Patients from each age group were propensity-score matched 1:1 to compare postoperative and survival outcomes. Results: Our database reported 1,031 patients, 112 of whom were in the ‘young’ group. For the unmatched analysis, young patients were more likely to have squamous cell carcinoma, higher rates of locally advanced disease, and subsequently higher rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (79.5% vs . 68.3%; P=0.047). After matching for pre-treatment clinical factors, young patients were less likely to have pulmonary or cardiac complications after surgery, and three times more likely to receive AC despite matching for stage and response to treatment (26.7% vs . 7.9%; P=0.002). Then, we matched patients including receipt of AC to study survival. In the second match, median recurrence-free survival (RFS) for young patients was 49.0±26.0 vs . old 27.0±5.4 months (P=0.215). Median overall survival (OS) for young was 73.0±28.9 vs . old 31.0±6.3 months (P=0.073). Conclusions: Young EC patients tend to present with more advanced disease. However, when matched for stage and response to therapies, young patients were three-times more likely to be offered AC. After adjusting for receipt of adjuvant therapy no difference was detected in RFS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of esophagus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOE-20-92\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOE-20-92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:年轻食管癌(EC)患者被认为具有更强的侵袭性,因此被认为生存率较差。在此,我们的目的是研究年轻对食管切除术治疗EC的短期和长期结果的影响。方法:纳入1994-2019年在我院接受食管切除术的EC患者。50岁被定义为“年轻”与“年轻”的分界线。“老”。每个年龄组的患者进行倾向评分1:1匹配,以比较术后和生存结果。结果:我们的数据库报告了1031例患者,其中112例属于“年轻”组。在非匹配分析中,年轻患者更容易患鳞状细胞癌,局部晚期疾病的发生率更高,随后新辅助化疗的发生率更高(79.5% vs . 79.5%)。68.3%;P = 0.047)。在匹配治疗前临床因素后,年轻患者术后发生肺部或心脏并发症的可能性较小,尽管分期和治疗反应匹配,但接受AC治疗的可能性是前者的三倍(26.7% vs。7.9%;P = 0.002)。然后,我们匹配包括接受AC的患者来研究生存率。在第二次配对中,年轻患者的中位无复发生存期(RFS)为49.0±26.0。年龄27.0±5.4个月(P=0.215)。年轻人的中位总生存期(OS)为73.0±28.9;老年31.0±6.3个月(P=0.073)。结论:年轻的EC患者往往表现为更晚期的疾病。然而,当分期和对治疗的反应相匹配时,年轻患者接受AC治疗的可能性增加了三倍。在调整接受辅助治疗后,RFS没有发现差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Esophageal cancer in young patients: does age affect treatment course and outcomes?
Background: Young patients with esophageal cancer (EC) are believed to have more aggressive disease, thus thought to have worse survival. Herein, we aim to study the impact of younger age on the short- and long-term outcomes of esophagectomy for EC. Methods: Patients who underwent esophagectomy for EC at our institution between 1994–2019 were included. Age 50 was defined as the cutoff for “young” vs . “old”. Patients from each age group were propensity-score matched 1:1 to compare postoperative and survival outcomes. Results: Our database reported 1,031 patients, 112 of whom were in the ‘young’ group. For the unmatched analysis, young patients were more likely to have squamous cell carcinoma, higher rates of locally advanced disease, and subsequently higher rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (79.5% vs . 68.3%; P=0.047). After matching for pre-treatment clinical factors, young patients were less likely to have pulmonary or cardiac complications after surgery, and three times more likely to receive AC despite matching for stage and response to treatment (26.7% vs . 7.9%; P=0.002). Then, we matched patients including receipt of AC to study survival. In the second match, median recurrence-free survival (RFS) for young patients was 49.0±26.0 vs . old 27.0±5.4 months (P=0.215). Median overall survival (OS) for young was 73.0±28.9 vs . old 31.0±6.3 months (P=0.073). Conclusions: Young EC patients tend to present with more advanced disease. However, when matched for stage and response to therapies, young patients were three-times more likely to be offered AC. After adjusting for receipt of adjuvant therapy no difference was detected in RFS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信