W. Abel, S. Longman-Mills, Jeannett Martin, D. Oshi, P. Whitehorne-Smith
{"title":"Ganja会导致精神疾病吗?基于人口的牙买加心理健康素养评估视角","authors":"W. Abel, S. Longman-Mills, Jeannett Martin, D. Oshi, P. Whitehorne-Smith","doi":"10.7727/wimj.2017.209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Mental illness is a major cause of morbidity and, globally, has a high lifetime risk. Mental health literacy is known to improve symptom recognition, care-seeking and treatment outcomes. This study therefore sought to assess the knowledge and beliefs of Jamaicans regarding the definition, aetiology, symptomatology, treatment and prevention of mental illness. Method: A nationally representative, randomly selected sample of 1224 respondents completed a 50-item questionnaire in a cross-sectional survey in Jamaica. Results: The highest proportion of respondents (31.9%) defined mental health as ‘a mad person/mentally disturbed’ while 57.4% defined mental illness as ‘mad/mentally disturbed/not in the right mind’. Though the majority of the respondents believed that mental illness could be identified, perception of identification features varied: worrying (68.6%), smoking ganja (62.3%) and studying too much (47.9%). Level of education and age were significantly associated with perceptions on ways to identify mental illness. Gender and educational level were significantly associated with perceptions on treatment and prevention of mental illness. Conclusion: There was limited knowledge of the definition, aetiology, symptomatology, treatment and prevention of mental illness. Low mental health literacy was associated with having little or no formal education, being a male and being in the younger age group (15–29 years).","PeriodicalId":49366,"journal":{"name":"West Indian Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Ganja Cause Mental Illness? Perspectives from a Population-based Assessment of Mental Health Literacy in Jamaica\",\"authors\":\"W. Abel, S. Longman-Mills, Jeannett Martin, D. Oshi, P. Whitehorne-Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.7727/wimj.2017.209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Mental illness is a major cause of morbidity and, globally, has a high lifetime risk. Mental health literacy is known to improve symptom recognition, care-seeking and treatment outcomes. This study therefore sought to assess the knowledge and beliefs of Jamaicans regarding the definition, aetiology, symptomatology, treatment and prevention of mental illness. Method: A nationally representative, randomly selected sample of 1224 respondents completed a 50-item questionnaire in a cross-sectional survey in Jamaica. Results: The highest proportion of respondents (31.9%) defined mental health as ‘a mad person/mentally disturbed’ while 57.4% defined mental illness as ‘mad/mentally disturbed/not in the right mind’. Though the majority of the respondents believed that mental illness could be identified, perception of identification features varied: worrying (68.6%), smoking ganja (62.3%) and studying too much (47.9%). Level of education and age were significantly associated with perceptions on ways to identify mental illness. Gender and educational level were significantly associated with perceptions on treatment and prevention of mental illness. Conclusion: There was limited knowledge of the definition, aetiology, symptomatology, treatment and prevention of mental illness. Low mental health literacy was associated with having little or no formal education, being a male and being in the younger age group (15–29 years).\",\"PeriodicalId\":49366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"West Indian Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"West Indian Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7727/wimj.2017.209\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"West Indian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7727/wimj.2017.209","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does Ganja Cause Mental Illness? Perspectives from a Population-based Assessment of Mental Health Literacy in Jamaica
Objective: Mental illness is a major cause of morbidity and, globally, has a high lifetime risk. Mental health literacy is known to improve symptom recognition, care-seeking and treatment outcomes. This study therefore sought to assess the knowledge and beliefs of Jamaicans regarding the definition, aetiology, symptomatology, treatment and prevention of mental illness. Method: A nationally representative, randomly selected sample of 1224 respondents completed a 50-item questionnaire in a cross-sectional survey in Jamaica. Results: The highest proportion of respondents (31.9%) defined mental health as ‘a mad person/mentally disturbed’ while 57.4% defined mental illness as ‘mad/mentally disturbed/not in the right mind’. Though the majority of the respondents believed that mental illness could be identified, perception of identification features varied: worrying (68.6%), smoking ganja (62.3%) and studying too much (47.9%). Level of education and age were significantly associated with perceptions on ways to identify mental illness. Gender and educational level were significantly associated with perceptions on treatment and prevention of mental illness. Conclusion: There was limited knowledge of the definition, aetiology, symptomatology, treatment and prevention of mental illness. Low mental health literacy was associated with having little or no formal education, being a male and being in the younger age group (15–29 years).
期刊介绍:
The Journal is international in scope, with author and editorial contributions from across the globe. The focus is on clinical and epidemiological aspects of tropical and infectious diseases, new and re-emerging infections, chronic non-communicable diseases, and medical conditions prevalent in the Latin America-Caribbean region, and of significance to global health, especially in developing countries. The Journal covers all medical disciplines, as well as basic and translational research elucidating the pathophysiologic basis of diseases or focussing on new therapeutic approaches, and publishes original scientific research, reviews, case reports, brief communications, letters, commentaries and medical images. The Journal publishes four to six issues and four supplements annually. English is the language of publication but Abstracts are also duplicated in Spanish. Most of the articles are submitted at the authors’ initiative, but some are solicited by the Editor-in-Chief. Unless expressly stated, the Editorial Board does not accept responsibility for authors’ opinions.
All papers on submission are reviewed by a subcommittee. Those deemed worthy for review are sent to two or three reviewers (one of the three might be a statistician if necessary). The returned papers with reviewer comments are reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief. Papers may be rejected, accepted or sent back to authors for revision. Resubmitted papers from authors are reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief and may be sent back to reviewers or a final decision made by Editor-in-Chief. The decision of the Editorial Board is final with regards to rejected articles. Rejected articles will not be returned to the authors. The editorial subcommittee has the right to return sub-standard manuscripts to the authors, rather than passing them on to the reviewers. This implies outright rejection of the manuscript.