早期新自由主义的理性政治:马克斯·韦伯、路德维希·冯·米塞斯和社会主义计算之争

IF 0.6 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1353/jhi.2022.0013

William Callison

{"title":"早期新自由主义的理性政治:马克斯·韦伯、路德维希·冯·米塞斯和社会主义计算之争","authors":"William Callison","doi":"10.1353/jhi.2022.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Initiated by Mises and popularized by Hayek, the socialist calculation debate staked a political position on a methodological axiom: the \"irrationality\" of state planning. This article argues that Weber's typology of \"formal\" vs. \"substantive\" rationality at once drew from Austrian School marginalism and helped frame Mises and Hayek's critiques in the calculation debate. In turn, this debate shaped an anti-socialist front among the early neoliberals before their vaunted gatherings in Paris and Mont Pèlerin. Through social scientific interventions, early neoliberalism split economics (qua market rationality) from politics (qua social justice) so as to place the latter beyond the epistemological pale.","PeriodicalId":47274,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS","volume":"83 1","pages":"269 - 291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Politics of Rationality in Early Neoliberalism: Max Weber, Ludwig von Mises, and the Socialist Calculation Debate\",\"authors\":\"William Callison\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jhi.2022.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Initiated by Mises and popularized by Hayek, the socialist calculation debate staked a political position on a methodological axiom: the \\\"irrationality\\\" of state planning. This article argues that Weber's typology of \\\"formal\\\" vs. \\\"substantive\\\" rationality at once drew from Austrian School marginalism and helped frame Mises and Hayek's critiques in the calculation debate. In turn, this debate shaped an anti-socialist front among the early neoliberals before their vaunted gatherings in Paris and Mont Pèlerin. Through social scientific interventions, early neoliberalism split economics (qua market rationality) from politics (qua social justice) so as to place the latter beyond the epistemological pale.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"269 - 291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2022.0013\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2022.0013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要：由米塞斯发起并由哈耶克推广的社会主义计算辩论将政治立场押在了一条方法论公理上：国家计划的“非理性”。本文认为，韦伯的“形式”理性与“实质”理性的类型学同时借鉴了奥地利学派的边缘主义，并帮助构建了米塞斯和哈耶克在计算辩论中的批评。反过来，这场辩论在早期的新自由主义者中形成了一个反社会主义阵线，他们在巴黎和巴黎山举行了引以为豪的集会。通过社会科学干预，早期的新自由主义将经济（作为市场理性）与政治（作为社会正义）割裂开来，使后者超越了认识论的苍白。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Politics of Rationality in Early Neoliberalism: Max Weber, Ludwig von Mises, and the Socialist Calculation Debate

Abstract:Initiated by Mises and popularized by Hayek, the socialist calculation debate staked a political position on a methodological axiom: the "irrationality" of state planning. This article argues that Weber's typology of "formal" vs. "substantive" rationality at once drew from Austrian School marginalism and helped frame Mises and Hayek's critiques in the calculation debate. In turn, this debate shaped an anti-socialist front among the early neoliberals before their vaunted gatherings in Paris and Mont Pèlerin. Through social scientific interventions, early neoliberalism split economics (qua market rationality) from politics (qua social justice) so as to place the latter beyond the epistemological pale.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Since its inception in 1940, the Journal of the History of Ideas has served as a medium for the publication of research in intellectual history that is of common interest to scholars and students in a wide range of fields. It is committed to encouraging diversity in regional coverage, chronological range, and methodological approaches. JHI defines intellectual history expansively and ecumenically, including the histories of philosophy, of literature and the arts, of the natural and social sciences, of religion, and of political thought. It also encourages scholarship at the intersections of cultural and intellectual history — for example, the history of the book and of visual culture.