新西兰奥特亚传统生态知识与环境人文关系方法

IF 0.4 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE
Scott D. Hess
{"title":"新西兰奥特亚传统生态知识与环境人文关系方法","authors":"Scott D. Hess","doi":"10.1353/srm.2023.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay contrasts the objective approach to environment by European explorers and settlers in Aotearoa New Zealand with the relational orientation of indigenous Māori people. European material \"improvement,\" scientific study, and aesthetic appreciation cohered around a shared ideology of objectivity as part of the larger Romantic-era expansion of imperial capitalism. This subject–object separation contrasts with the relational paradigm of Traditional Ecological Knowledge, in which acts of knowing (re)situate humans within their environments in order to maintain and restore relations. The essay argues for a relational approach to the environmental humanities analogous to the relationality of Traditional Ecological Knowledge.","PeriodicalId":44848,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN ROMANTICISM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aotearoa New Zealand, Traditional Ecological Knowledge, and a Relational Method for the Environmental Humanities\",\"authors\":\"Scott D. Hess\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/srm.2023.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay contrasts the objective approach to environment by European explorers and settlers in Aotearoa New Zealand with the relational orientation of indigenous Māori people. European material \\\"improvement,\\\" scientific study, and aesthetic appreciation cohered around a shared ideology of objectivity as part of the larger Romantic-era expansion of imperial capitalism. This subject–object separation contrasts with the relational paradigm of Traditional Ecological Knowledge, in which acts of knowing (re)situate humans within their environments in order to maintain and restore relations. The essay argues for a relational approach to the environmental humanities analogous to the relationality of Traditional Ecological Knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIES IN ROMANTICISM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIES IN ROMANTICISM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/srm.2023.0003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN ROMANTICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/srm.2023.0003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文对比了欧洲探险家和殖民者在新西兰奥特罗阿的客观环境取向与土著Māori人的关系取向。欧洲的物质“改进”、科学研究和审美都围绕着一种共同的客观意识形态,这是帝国资本主义在浪漫时代扩张的一部分。这种主客体分离与传统生态知识的关系范式形成鲜明对比,在传统生态知识中,认识行为(重新)将人类置于其环境中,以维持和恢复关系。本文主张用一种类似于传统生态知识的关系方法来研究环境人文学科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aotearoa New Zealand, Traditional Ecological Knowledge, and a Relational Method for the Environmental Humanities
Abstract:This essay contrasts the objective approach to environment by European explorers and settlers in Aotearoa New Zealand with the relational orientation of indigenous Māori people. European material "improvement," scientific study, and aesthetic appreciation cohered around a shared ideology of objectivity as part of the larger Romantic-era expansion of imperial capitalism. This subject–object separation contrasts with the relational paradigm of Traditional Ecological Knowledge, in which acts of knowing (re)situate humans within their environments in order to maintain and restore relations. The essay argues for a relational approach to the environmental humanities analogous to the relationality of Traditional Ecological Knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Studies in Romanticism was founded in 1961 by David Bonnell Green at a time when it was still possible to wonder whether "romanticism" was a term worth theorizing (as Morse Peckham deliberated in the first essay of the first number). It seemed that it was, and, ever since, SiR (as it is known to abbreviation) has flourished under a fine succession of editors: Edwin Silverman, W. H. Stevenson, Charles Stone III, Michael Cooke, Morton Palet, and (continuously since 1978) David Wagenknecht. There are other fine journals in which scholars of romanticism feel it necessary to appear - and over the years there are a few important scholars of the period who have not been represented there by important work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信