预测复杂妊娠妇女产后抑郁的心理社会风险评估工具?。

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
A. Hamidia, F. Kheirkhah, Z. Basirat, Reza Ghadimi, M. Chehrazi, S. Barat, P. Cuijpers, Elizabeth O' Connor, S. Mirtabar, M. Faramarzi
{"title":"预测复杂妊娠妇女产后抑郁的心理社会风险评估工具?。","authors":"A. Hamidia, F. Kheirkhah, Z. Basirat, Reza Ghadimi, M. Chehrazi, S. Barat, P. Cuijpers, Elizabeth O' Connor, S. Mirtabar, M. Faramarzi","doi":"10.2174/2666082218666220629090101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few studies have reported the role of psychosocial risk factors by a validated scale in predicting mental disorders in women with complicated pregnancy. This study investigated the role of a psychosocial risk assessment tool in the prediction of postnatal depression in women with complicated pregnancy.\n\n\n\nA prospective study was performed on pregnant women with complicated pregnancy from December 2019 to June 2020. A total of 125 pregnant women filled the Antenatal Risk Questionnaire (ANRQ), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Brief Symptom Inventory 53-items (BSI-53). Also, the patients completed EPDS during 6-weeks of postpartum. An expert mental specialist conducted the interviews based on the DSM-5.\n\n\n\nMore than half of the women with complicated pregnancy were diagnosed to have at least one mental disorder. The mean risk scores of ANRQ including the childhood social support from the respondent’s mother, history of mental illness, perceived level of support available postpartum, significant life events in the past 12 months, and personality traits with high anxiety were higher in women with mental disorders than those without mental disorders. The results emphasized that the total score of ANRQ was the strongest positive predictor for postnatal depression score of EPDS (β = 0.569, p=<0.001), for the total score of BSI-53 (β = 0.666 p=<0.001), and for GSI (β = 0.237, p=0.019).\n\n\n\nThe study proposes that the use of a validated psychosocial risk assessment tool alongside a screening psychological tool, like EPDS, is reliable for prediction of mental disorders and help women with complicated pregnancy at risk for prevention of depression at antenatal visits.","PeriodicalId":36711,"journal":{"name":"Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A psychosocial risk assessment tool to predict postnatal depression in women with complicated pregnancy?.\",\"authors\":\"A. Hamidia, F. Kheirkhah, Z. Basirat, Reza Ghadimi, M. Chehrazi, S. Barat, P. Cuijpers, Elizabeth O' Connor, S. Mirtabar, M. Faramarzi\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/2666082218666220629090101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Few studies have reported the role of psychosocial risk factors by a validated scale in predicting mental disorders in women with complicated pregnancy. This study investigated the role of a psychosocial risk assessment tool in the prediction of postnatal depression in women with complicated pregnancy.\\n\\n\\n\\nA prospective study was performed on pregnant women with complicated pregnancy from December 2019 to June 2020. A total of 125 pregnant women filled the Antenatal Risk Questionnaire (ANRQ), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Brief Symptom Inventory 53-items (BSI-53). Also, the patients completed EPDS during 6-weeks of postpartum. An expert mental specialist conducted the interviews based on the DSM-5.\\n\\n\\n\\nMore than half of the women with complicated pregnancy were diagnosed to have at least one mental disorder. The mean risk scores of ANRQ including the childhood social support from the respondent’s mother, history of mental illness, perceived level of support available postpartum, significant life events in the past 12 months, and personality traits with high anxiety were higher in women with mental disorders than those without mental disorders. The results emphasized that the total score of ANRQ was the strongest positive predictor for postnatal depression score of EPDS (β = 0.569, p=<0.001), for the total score of BSI-53 (β = 0.666 p=<0.001), and for GSI (β = 0.237, p=0.019).\\n\\n\\n\\nThe study proposes that the use of a validated psychosocial risk assessment tool alongside a screening psychological tool, like EPDS, is reliable for prediction of mental disorders and help women with complicated pregnancy at risk for prevention of depression at antenatal visits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/2666082218666220629090101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2666082218666220629090101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

很少有研究报道了心理社会风险因素在预测复杂妊娠妇女精神障碍中的作用。本研究调查了心理社会风险评估工具在复杂妊娠妇女产后抑郁症预测中的作用。2019年12月至2020年6月,对患有复杂妊娠的孕妇进行了一项前瞻性研究。共有125名孕妇填写了产前风险问卷(ANRQ)、爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)和简要症状量表53项(BSI-53)。此外,患者在产后6周内完成了EPDS。一位心理专家根据DSM-5进行了访谈。超过一半的复杂妊娠妇女被诊断为至少有一种心理障碍。患有精神障碍的女性的ANRQ平均风险得分(包括受试者母亲的童年社会支持、精神病史、产后可获得的支持水平、过去12个月的重大生活事件以及具有高度焦虑的人格特征)高于没有精神障碍的妇女。结果强调,ANRQ总分是EPDS产后抑郁评分(β=0.569,p=0.001)、BSI-53总分(β=0.661,p=0.0001)和GSI总分(β0.237,p=0.019)的最强阳性预测因子,对精神障碍的预测是可靠的,并有助于有复杂妊娠风险的妇女在产前检查时预防抑郁症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A psychosocial risk assessment tool to predict postnatal depression in women with complicated pregnancy?.
Few studies have reported the role of psychosocial risk factors by a validated scale in predicting mental disorders in women with complicated pregnancy. This study investigated the role of a psychosocial risk assessment tool in the prediction of postnatal depression in women with complicated pregnancy. A prospective study was performed on pregnant women with complicated pregnancy from December 2019 to June 2020. A total of 125 pregnant women filled the Antenatal Risk Questionnaire (ANRQ), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Brief Symptom Inventory 53-items (BSI-53). Also, the patients completed EPDS during 6-weeks of postpartum. An expert mental specialist conducted the interviews based on the DSM-5. More than half of the women with complicated pregnancy were diagnosed to have at least one mental disorder. The mean risk scores of ANRQ including the childhood social support from the respondent’s mother, history of mental illness, perceived level of support available postpartum, significant life events in the past 12 months, and personality traits with high anxiety were higher in women with mental disorders than those without mental disorders. The results emphasized that the total score of ANRQ was the strongest positive predictor for postnatal depression score of EPDS (β = 0.569, p=<0.001), for the total score of BSI-53 (β = 0.666 p=<0.001), and for GSI (β = 0.237, p=0.019). The study proposes that the use of a validated psychosocial risk assessment tool alongside a screening psychological tool, like EPDS, is reliable for prediction of mental disorders and help women with complicated pregnancy at risk for prevention of depression at antenatal visits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews
Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信