{"title":"马来西亚学习者写作中的重复束","authors":"Siti Aeisha Joharry","doi":"10.1075/aral.19028.joh","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n One way to investigate learner writing is by analyzing the most frequently recurring sequences of words, that is,\n lexical bundles. This paper presents results for lexical bundles analyses of a Malaysian corpus (MCSAW) against its reference\n language variety, LOCNESS (Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays). Key 4-word lexical bundles are firstly investigated in terms\n of their frequencies as well as distribution in both corpora. Following this, key lexical bundles are further categorized and\n analyzed according to their functions, including qualitative analysis of the most recurrent bundles by examination of concordance\n lines. Results show that learners use simple types of lexical bundles repeatedly compared to their native speaker counterparts.\n Evidence of tautology can also be found in learner writing. The findings highlight that using lexical bundles appropriately is\n important to achieve native-like fluency, while the absence of more varied lexical bundles in learners’ discourse may result in\n unidiomatic-sounding writing style.","PeriodicalId":43911,"journal":{"name":"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repetitive bundles in Malaysian learner writing\",\"authors\":\"Siti Aeisha Joharry\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/aral.19028.joh\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n One way to investigate learner writing is by analyzing the most frequently recurring sequences of words, that is,\\n lexical bundles. This paper presents results for lexical bundles analyses of a Malaysian corpus (MCSAW) against its reference\\n language variety, LOCNESS (Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays). Key 4-word lexical bundles are firstly investigated in terms\\n of their frequencies as well as distribution in both corpora. Following this, key lexical bundles are further categorized and\\n analyzed according to their functions, including qualitative analysis of the most recurrent bundles by examination of concordance\\n lines. Results show that learners use simple types of lexical bundles repeatedly compared to their native speaker counterparts.\\n Evidence of tautology can also be found in learner writing. The findings highlight that using lexical bundles appropriately is\\n important to achieve native-like fluency, while the absence of more varied lexical bundles in learners’ discourse may result in\\n unidiomatic-sounding writing style.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.19028.joh\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.19028.joh","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究学习者写作的一种方法是分析最频繁出现的单词序列,即词汇束。本文介绍了马来西亚语料库(MCAW)与参考语言LOCNESS(Louvain corpus of Native English Essays)的词束分析结果。首先从两个语料库中的4个关键词词束的频率和分布两个方面进行了研究。接下来,根据关键词束的功能对其进行进一步的分类和分析,包括通过检查一致性线对最常见的词束进行定性分析。结果表明,与母语为英语的学习者相比,学习者重复使用简单类型的词汇束。同义反复的证据也可以在学习者的写作中找到。研究结果强调,恰当地使用词束对于实现母语般的流利性很重要,而在学习者的话语中缺乏更多变化的词束可能会导致发音单一的写作风格。
One way to investigate learner writing is by analyzing the most frequently recurring sequences of words, that is,
lexical bundles. This paper presents results for lexical bundles analyses of a Malaysian corpus (MCSAW) against its reference
language variety, LOCNESS (Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays). Key 4-word lexical bundles are firstly investigated in terms
of their frequencies as well as distribution in both corpora. Following this, key lexical bundles are further categorized and
analyzed according to their functions, including qualitative analysis of the most recurrent bundles by examination of concordance
lines. Results show that learners use simple types of lexical bundles repeatedly compared to their native speaker counterparts.
Evidence of tautology can also be found in learner writing. The findings highlight that using lexical bundles appropriately is
important to achieve native-like fluency, while the absence of more varied lexical bundles in learners’ discourse may result in
unidiomatic-sounding writing style.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Review of Applied Linguistics (ARAL) is the preeminent journal of the Applied Linguistics Association of Australia (ALAA). ARAL is a peer reviewed journal that promotes scholarly discussion and contemporary understandings of language-related matters with a view to impacting on real-world problems and debates. The journal publishes empirical and theoretical research on language/s in educational, professional, institutional and community settings. ARAL welcomes national and international submissions presenting research related to any of the major sub-disciplines of Applied Linguistics as well as transdisciplinary studies. Areas of particular interest include but are not limited to: · Analysis of discourse and interaction · Assessment and evaluation · Bi/multilingualism and bi/multilingual education · Corpus linguistics · Cognitive linguistics · Language, culture and identity · Language maintenance and revitalization · Language planning and policy · Language teaching and learning, including specific languages and TESOL · Pragmatics · Research design and methodology · Second language acquisition · Sociolinguistics · Language and technology · Translating and interpreting.