{"title":"食用鱼内脏肠衣的初步筛选及工艺标准化","authors":"K. Blossom, Ancy Thomas, M. P. Safeena","doi":"10.21077/ijf.2021.68.3.89358-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fish viscera rich in protein components can be utilised for the preparation of sausage casing which will serve as a means of fish processing waste management. A study was conducted on preliminary screening and selection of fish viscera for sausage casing, comparison of the selected casing with goat casing and quality analysis of the sausage during storage at -21°C for 60 days. Viscera from Saurida tumbil, Katsuwonus pelamis, Labeo rohita, Pangasius hypophthalmus and Scomberomorus guttatus were collected and salt treated to improve quality. A standard recipe was followed for the preparation of sausage using meat of S. tumbil. Fish sausages were processed at 70°C for 15 min. Lizard fish gut was selected as best for sausage casing via sensory analysis and was compared with goat casing by texture profile analyser. There was significant difference in textural qualities except springiness and cohesiveness (p<0.5%). The quality parameters like pH, peroxide value, free fatty acid, total volatile base nitrogen, trimethyl amine and total plate count were analysed. A gradual increase in all parameters was observed as storage proceeded but was within the acceptable limit except pH. Keywords: Alternative casing, Fish processing, Fish sausage, Fish waste management","PeriodicalId":50372,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Fisheries","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary screening and process standardisation of edible sausage casing from fish viscera\",\"authors\":\"K. Blossom, Ancy Thomas, M. P. Safeena\",\"doi\":\"10.21077/ijf.2021.68.3.89358-18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fish viscera rich in protein components can be utilised for the preparation of sausage casing which will serve as a means of fish processing waste management. A study was conducted on preliminary screening and selection of fish viscera for sausage casing, comparison of the selected casing with goat casing and quality analysis of the sausage during storage at -21°C for 60 days. Viscera from Saurida tumbil, Katsuwonus pelamis, Labeo rohita, Pangasius hypophthalmus and Scomberomorus guttatus were collected and salt treated to improve quality. A standard recipe was followed for the preparation of sausage using meat of S. tumbil. Fish sausages were processed at 70°C for 15 min. Lizard fish gut was selected as best for sausage casing via sensory analysis and was compared with goat casing by texture profile analyser. There was significant difference in textural qualities except springiness and cohesiveness (p<0.5%). The quality parameters like pH, peroxide value, free fatty acid, total volatile base nitrogen, trimethyl amine and total plate count were analysed. A gradual increase in all parameters was observed as storage proceeded but was within the acceptable limit except pH. Keywords: Alternative casing, Fish processing, Fish sausage, Fish waste management\",\"PeriodicalId\":50372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Fisheries\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21077/ijf.2021.68.3.89358-18\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21077/ijf.2021.68.3.89358-18","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preliminary screening and process standardisation of edible sausage casing from fish viscera
Fish viscera rich in protein components can be utilised for the preparation of sausage casing which will serve as a means of fish processing waste management. A study was conducted on preliminary screening and selection of fish viscera for sausage casing, comparison of the selected casing with goat casing and quality analysis of the sausage during storage at -21°C for 60 days. Viscera from Saurida tumbil, Katsuwonus pelamis, Labeo rohita, Pangasius hypophthalmus and Scomberomorus guttatus were collected and salt treated to improve quality. A standard recipe was followed for the preparation of sausage using meat of S. tumbil. Fish sausages were processed at 70°C for 15 min. Lizard fish gut was selected as best for sausage casing via sensory analysis and was compared with goat casing by texture profile analyser. There was significant difference in textural qualities except springiness and cohesiveness (p<0.5%). The quality parameters like pH, peroxide value, free fatty acid, total volatile base nitrogen, trimethyl amine and total plate count were analysed. A gradual increase in all parameters was observed as storage proceeded but was within the acceptable limit except pH. Keywords: Alternative casing, Fish processing, Fish sausage, Fish waste management
期刊介绍:
Indian Journal of Fisheries is published quarterly by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi. Original contributions in the field of Fish and fisheries science are considered for publication in the Journal. The material submitted must be unpublished and not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Papers based on research which kills or damages any species, regarded as thratened/ endangered by IUCN crieteria or is as such listed in the Red Data Book appropriate to the geographic area concerned, will not be accepted by the Journal, unless the work has clear conservation objectives.