与水共存:物业水平对城市洪水抵御能力的定量评估

IF 0.9 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
A. Amadi, O. Adeniyi
{"title":"与水共存:物业水平对城市洪水抵御能力的定量评估","authors":"A. Amadi, O. Adeniyi","doi":"10.1108/ijdrbe-01-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to quantitively assess the resilience of residential properties to urban flooding in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, and assess whether they vary at spatially aggregated scales relative to the level of flood exposure.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study synthesizes theoretical constructs/indicators for quantifying property level resilience, as a basis for measuring resilience. Using a two-stage purposive/stratified randomized sampling approach, 407 questionnaires were sent out to residents of 25 flood-prone areas, to solicit information on the resilience constructs as indicated by the adaptation behaviors of individual households and their property attributes. A principal component analysis approach is used as a mechanism for weighting the indicators, based on which aggregated spatial-scale resilience indices were computed for the 25 sampled areas relative to their levels of flood exposure.\n\n\nFindings\nArea 11 located in the moderate flood zone has the lowest resilience index, while Area 20 located in the high flood zone has the highest resilience index. The resilience indices for the low, moderate and high flood zone show only minimal and statistically insignificant differences indicating maladaptation even with incremental levels of flood exposure.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe approach to resilience measurement exemplifies a reproducible lens through which the concept of “living with floods” can be holistically assessed at the property level while highlighting the nexus of the social and technical dimensions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study moves beyond theoretical conceptualization, to empirically quantify the complex concept of property-level flood resilience.\n","PeriodicalId":45983,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Living with water: quantitative assessment of property-level resilience to urban flooding\",\"authors\":\"A. Amadi, O. Adeniyi\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijdrbe-01-2023-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to quantitively assess the resilience of residential properties to urban flooding in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, and assess whether they vary at spatially aggregated scales relative to the level of flood exposure.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe study synthesizes theoretical constructs/indicators for quantifying property level resilience, as a basis for measuring resilience. Using a two-stage purposive/stratified randomized sampling approach, 407 questionnaires were sent out to residents of 25 flood-prone areas, to solicit information on the resilience constructs as indicated by the adaptation behaviors of individual households and their property attributes. A principal component analysis approach is used as a mechanism for weighting the indicators, based on which aggregated spatial-scale resilience indices were computed for the 25 sampled areas relative to their levels of flood exposure.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nArea 11 located in the moderate flood zone has the lowest resilience index, while Area 20 located in the high flood zone has the highest resilience index. The resilience indices for the low, moderate and high flood zone show only minimal and statistically insignificant differences indicating maladaptation even with incremental levels of flood exposure.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe approach to resilience measurement exemplifies a reproducible lens through which the concept of “living with floods” can be holistically assessed at the property level while highlighting the nexus of the social and technical dimensions.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe study moves beyond theoretical conceptualization, to empirically quantify the complex concept of property-level flood resilience.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdrbe-01-2023-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdrbe-01-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本文旨在定量评估尼日利亚哈科特港住宅物业对城市洪水的抵御能力,并评估它们是否在空间聚合尺度上相对于洪水暴露水平而变化。设计/方法/方法该研究综合了量化财产层面弹性的理论结构/指标,作为衡量弹性的基础。采用两阶段有目的/分层随机抽样方法,向25个洪水易发地区的居民发送了407份问卷,以收集有关个体家庭适应行为及其财产属性所表明的恢复力结构的信息。主成分分析方法被用作对指标进行加权的机制,在此基础上,计算了25个采样区相对于其洪水暴露水平的总体空间尺度弹性指数。Findings位于中等洪水区的11区的恢复指数最低,而位于高洪水区的20区的恢复系数最高。低、中、高洪水区的恢复力指数仅显示出最小且统计上不显著的差异,表明即使洪水暴露水平增加,也存在适应不良。实际含义复原力测量方法体现了一种可复制的视角,通过这种视角,可以在财产层面全面评估“与洪水共存”的概念,同时强调社会和技术层面的联系。独创性/价值该研究超越了理论概念化,从经验上量化了财产水平洪水恢复力的复杂概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Living with water: quantitative assessment of property-level resilience to urban flooding
Purpose This paper aims to quantitively assess the resilience of residential properties to urban flooding in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, and assess whether they vary at spatially aggregated scales relative to the level of flood exposure. Design/methodology/approach The study synthesizes theoretical constructs/indicators for quantifying property level resilience, as a basis for measuring resilience. Using a two-stage purposive/stratified randomized sampling approach, 407 questionnaires were sent out to residents of 25 flood-prone areas, to solicit information on the resilience constructs as indicated by the adaptation behaviors of individual households and their property attributes. A principal component analysis approach is used as a mechanism for weighting the indicators, based on which aggregated spatial-scale resilience indices were computed for the 25 sampled areas relative to their levels of flood exposure. Findings Area 11 located in the moderate flood zone has the lowest resilience index, while Area 20 located in the high flood zone has the highest resilience index. The resilience indices for the low, moderate and high flood zone show only minimal and statistically insignificant differences indicating maladaptation even with incremental levels of flood exposure. Practical implications The approach to resilience measurement exemplifies a reproducible lens through which the concept of “living with floods” can be holistically assessed at the property level while highlighting the nexus of the social and technical dimensions. Originality/value The study moves beyond theoretical conceptualization, to empirically quantify the complex concept of property-level flood resilience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信