卡利班在博览会上:在暴风雨和巴塞洛缪博览会中塑造非人性

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Renaissance Drama Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1086/719933
Toria Johnson
{"title":"卡利班在博览会上:在暴风雨和巴塞洛缪博览会中塑造非人性","authors":"Toria Johnson","doi":"10.1086/719933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"he induction of Bartholomew Fair broadcasts its strangeness even before the scrivener presents the “articles of agreement” (ind. 49) that outline a t contract between Jonson and the play’s first public audience. The BookHolder’s announcement that the articles stand “not for want of a prologue, but by way of a new one” highlights that what is coming is different and encourages audiences to perceive that difference as an innovation rather than a shortcoming. The induction anticipates, negotiates, andmoves away from awider set of audience expectations; that work begins when the Stage-Keeper enters and, supposedly stalling for time while Master Littlewit’s costume is mended, offers some unsolicited criticism of what the play lacks. “He has ne’er a sword-and-bucklerman in his Fair, nor a Little Davy,” the Stage-Keeper complains, “nor a Kindheart . . . nor a juggler with a well-educated ape. . . .None o’ these fine sights!” (ind. 10–15). According to the Stage-Keeper, in these omissions Jonson has failed to capture the essence of the real fair in Smithfield: “He has not hit the humours—he does not know ‘em” (ind. 9).","PeriodicalId":53676,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Drama","volume":"50 1","pages":"51 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Caliban at the Fair: Figuring Nonhumanity in The Tempest and Bartholomew Fair\",\"authors\":\"Toria Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/719933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"he induction of Bartholomew Fair broadcasts its strangeness even before the scrivener presents the “articles of agreement” (ind. 49) that outline a t contract between Jonson and the play’s first public audience. The BookHolder’s announcement that the articles stand “not for want of a prologue, but by way of a new one” highlights that what is coming is different and encourages audiences to perceive that difference as an innovation rather than a shortcoming. The induction anticipates, negotiates, andmoves away from awider set of audience expectations; that work begins when the Stage-Keeper enters and, supposedly stalling for time while Master Littlewit’s costume is mended, offers some unsolicited criticism of what the play lacks. “He has ne’er a sword-and-bucklerman in his Fair, nor a Little Davy,” the Stage-Keeper complains, “nor a Kindheart . . . nor a juggler with a well-educated ape. . . .None o’ these fine sights!” (ind. 10–15). According to the Stage-Keeper, in these omissions Jonson has failed to capture the essence of the real fair in Smithfield: “He has not hit the humours—he does not know ‘em” (ind. 9).\",\"PeriodicalId\":53676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renaissance Drama\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"51 - 72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renaissance Drama\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/719933\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renaissance Drama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/719933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

巴塞洛缪博览会的介绍甚至在编剧提出“协议条款”(第49页)之前就已经传播出了它的怪异之处,该条款概述了琼森与该剧第一批公众观众之间的合同。BookHolder宣布,这些文章“不是因为缺少序言,而是通过一个新的序言”,强调了即将到来的是不同的,并鼓励观众将这种差异视为一种创新,而不是缺点。入职培训预期、协商并偏离了一组更广泛的观众期望;当舞台看守进入时,这部作品就开始了,据说在Littlewit大师的服装修补期间拖延了一段时间,对该剧的不足提出了一些不请自来的批评。舞台管理员抱怨道:“他的集市上没有剑和雄鹿,也没有小戴维,也没有善良的心……也没有受过良好教育的猿猴杂耍演员……这些美景都没有!”(第10-15页)。根据《舞台守护者》的说法,在这些疏漏中,琼森未能抓住史密斯菲尔德真正公平的本质:“他没有达到幽默——他不了解幽默”(第9章)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Caliban at the Fair: Figuring Nonhumanity in The Tempest and Bartholomew Fair
he induction of Bartholomew Fair broadcasts its strangeness even before the scrivener presents the “articles of agreement” (ind. 49) that outline a t contract between Jonson and the play’s first public audience. The BookHolder’s announcement that the articles stand “not for want of a prologue, but by way of a new one” highlights that what is coming is different and encourages audiences to perceive that difference as an innovation rather than a shortcoming. The induction anticipates, negotiates, andmoves away from awider set of audience expectations; that work begins when the Stage-Keeper enters and, supposedly stalling for time while Master Littlewit’s costume is mended, offers some unsolicited criticism of what the play lacks. “He has ne’er a sword-and-bucklerman in his Fair, nor a Little Davy,” the Stage-Keeper complains, “nor a Kindheart . . . nor a juggler with a well-educated ape. . . .None o’ these fine sights!” (ind. 10–15). According to the Stage-Keeper, in these omissions Jonson has failed to capture the essence of the real fair in Smithfield: “He has not hit the humours—he does not know ‘em” (ind. 9).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renaissance Drama
Renaissance Drama Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信