运用传播研究方法了解项目评估标准的认识、采用和使用

Julie Q. Morrison, Kay M. Cunningham
{"title":"运用传播研究方法了解项目评估标准的认识、采用和使用","authors":"Julie Q. Morrison, Kay M. Cunningham","doi":"10.56645/jmde.v19i43.835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The adoption and use of effective, legally defensible, and ethically sound practices relies on the successful dissemination of evidence-based practices and professional standards. The field of program evaluation has standards, competencies, and principles, yet little is known about how these are utilized by education-focused program evaluators.\nPurpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the dissemination and use of the program evaluation standards established by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, relative to the dissemination and use of the American Evaluation Association’s (AEA’s) guiding principles and AEA’s evaluator competencies.\nSetting: The SIGnetwork, a network of evaluators of State Personnel Development Grants (SPDGs) funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office for Special Education Programs (OSEP).\nIntervention: NA\nResearch Design:  Descriptive research.\nData Collection and Analysis: Data collection involved administering an online survey to members designated as evaluators in the SIGnetwork directory. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data collected via the online survey.\nFindings: Using the formative audience research approach to understanding dissemination, the results of the study support previous findings that awareness of the standards was inconsistent among a sample of AEA members. Respondents self-reported low to moderate levels of familiarity with The Program Evaluation Standards and the other two guidance documents: Guiding Principles for Evaluators and AEA Evaluator Competencies. Using the audience segmentation research approach to understanding dissemination, the results of this study indicate that participants who were AEA members were more likely than those who were not members of AEA to report being familiar with the standards and to have earned an advanced degree related to their role as an evaluator.\nKeywords: Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, American Evaluation Association, program evaluation standards","PeriodicalId":91909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Dissemination Research Approaches to Understand the Awareness, Adoption, and Use of The Program Evaluation Standards\",\"authors\":\"Julie Q. Morrison, Kay M. Cunningham\",\"doi\":\"10.56645/jmde.v19i43.835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The adoption and use of effective, legally defensible, and ethically sound practices relies on the successful dissemination of evidence-based practices and professional standards. The field of program evaluation has standards, competencies, and principles, yet little is known about how these are utilized by education-focused program evaluators.\\nPurpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the dissemination and use of the program evaluation standards established by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, relative to the dissemination and use of the American Evaluation Association’s (AEA’s) guiding principles and AEA’s evaluator competencies.\\nSetting: The SIGnetwork, a network of evaluators of State Personnel Development Grants (SPDGs) funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office for Special Education Programs (OSEP).\\nIntervention: NA\\nResearch Design:  Descriptive research.\\nData Collection and Analysis: Data collection involved administering an online survey to members designated as evaluators in the SIGnetwork directory. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data collected via the online survey.\\nFindings: Using the formative audience research approach to understanding dissemination, the results of the study support previous findings that awareness of the standards was inconsistent among a sample of AEA members. Respondents self-reported low to moderate levels of familiarity with The Program Evaluation Standards and the other two guidance documents: Guiding Principles for Evaluators and AEA Evaluator Competencies. Using the audience segmentation research approach to understanding dissemination, the results of this study indicate that participants who were AEA members were more likely than those who were not members of AEA to report being familiar with the standards and to have earned an advanced degree related to their role as an evaluator.\\nKeywords: Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, American Evaluation Association, program evaluation standards\",\"PeriodicalId\":91909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v19i43.835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v19i43.835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:采用和使用有效的、合法的、合乎道德的实践依赖于成功传播循证实践和专业标准。项目评估领域有标准、能力和原则,但很少有人知道这些是如何被以教育为重点的项目评估者利用的。目的:本研究的目的是检查由教育评估标准联合委员会制定的项目评估标准的传播和使用情况,相对于美国评估协会(AEA)指导原则的传播和使用以及AEA评估员的能力。背景:SIGnetwork,由美国教育部特殊教育项目办公室(OSEP)资助的国家人才发展补助金(spdg)评估者网络。研究设计:描述性研究。数据收集和分析:数据收集包括对SIGnetwork目录中指定为评估者的成员进行在线调查。描述性统计用于总结通过在线调查收集的数据。研究结果:使用形成性受众研究方法来理解传播,研究结果支持先前的研究结果,即在AEA成员样本中对标准的认识不一致。受访者自我报告对项目评估标准和其他两个指导性文件:评估人员指导原则和AEA评估人员能力的熟悉程度为低到中等水平。使用受众细分研究方法来理解传播,本研究的结果表明,作为AEA成员的参与者比那些不是AEA成员的参与者更有可能报告他们熟悉标准,并获得与他们作为评估者角色相关的高级学位。关键词:教育评估标准联合委员会,美国评估协会,项目评估标准
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Dissemination Research Approaches to Understand the Awareness, Adoption, and Use of The Program Evaluation Standards
Background: The adoption and use of effective, legally defensible, and ethically sound practices relies on the successful dissemination of evidence-based practices and professional standards. The field of program evaluation has standards, competencies, and principles, yet little is known about how these are utilized by education-focused program evaluators. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the dissemination and use of the program evaluation standards established by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, relative to the dissemination and use of the American Evaluation Association’s (AEA’s) guiding principles and AEA’s evaluator competencies. Setting: The SIGnetwork, a network of evaluators of State Personnel Development Grants (SPDGs) funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office for Special Education Programs (OSEP). Intervention: NA Research Design:  Descriptive research. Data Collection and Analysis: Data collection involved administering an online survey to members designated as evaluators in the SIGnetwork directory. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data collected via the online survey. Findings: Using the formative audience research approach to understanding dissemination, the results of the study support previous findings that awareness of the standards was inconsistent among a sample of AEA members. Respondents self-reported low to moderate levels of familiarity with The Program Evaluation Standards and the other two guidance documents: Guiding Principles for Evaluators and AEA Evaluator Competencies. Using the audience segmentation research approach to understanding dissemination, the results of this study indicate that participants who were AEA members were more likely than those who were not members of AEA to report being familiar with the standards and to have earned an advanced degree related to their role as an evaluator. Keywords: Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, American Evaluation Association, program evaluation standards
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信