苏格兰和布里顿皮克特语的奥格姆铭文

Q1 Arts and Humanities

Journal of Celtic Linguistics Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.16922/JCL.21.6

S. Rodway

{"title":"苏格兰和布里顿皮克特语的奥格姆铭文","authors":"S. Rodway","doi":"10.16922/JCL.21.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I examine the evidence brought forward by Katherine Forsyth in support of the hypothesis that the 'Pictish' ogham inscriptions of Scotland are linguistically Celtic. Having examined the five most promising inscriptions minutely, I conclude that they are in fact not Celtic,\n and that 'Celtic-looking' sequences in them are due to coincidence. Thus, the language of this corpus of inscriptions remains unknown.","PeriodicalId":35107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Celtic Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.16922/JCL.21.6","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ogham Inscriptions of Scotland and Brittonic Pictish\",\"authors\":\"S. Rodway\",\"doi\":\"10.16922/JCL.21.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I examine the evidence brought forward by Katherine Forsyth in support of the hypothesis that the 'Pictish' ogham inscriptions of Scotland are linguistically Celtic. Having examined the five most promising inscriptions minutely, I conclude that they are in fact not Celtic,\\n and that 'Celtic-looking' sequences in them are due to coincidence. Thus, the language of this corpus of inscriptions remains unknown.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Celtic Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.16922/JCL.21.6\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Celtic Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16922/JCL.21.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Celtic Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16922/JCL.21.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

在本文中，我研究了凯瑟琳·福赛斯(Katherine Forsyth)提出的证据，以支持苏格兰的“皮克特”欧根文字在语言上是凯尔特的假设。在仔细检查了五个最有希望的铭文后，我得出结论，它们实际上不是凯尔特人的，其中的“凯尔特人外观”序列是由于巧合。因此，这些铭文的语言仍然是未知的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Ogham Inscriptions of Scotland and Brittonic Pictish

In this paper, I examine the evidence brought forward by Katherine Forsyth in support of the hypothesis that the 'Pictish' ogham inscriptions of Scotland are linguistically Celtic. Having examined the five most promising inscriptions minutely, I conclude that they are in fact not Celtic, and that 'Celtic-looking' sequences in them are due to coincidence. Thus, the language of this corpus of inscriptions remains unknown.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Celtic Linguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Celtic Linguistics publishes articles and reviews on all aspects of the linguistics of the Celtic languages, modern, medieval and ancient, with particular emphasis on synchronic studies, while not excluding diachronic and comparative-historical work. Papers are invited in English on all fields/‘levels’ of analysis; phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics; formal or functional, cross-language typological or language-internal, dialectological or sociolinguistic, any theoretical paradigm.