利用现有段塞流含液率模型预测水平段塞-段塞流过渡的分析、比较和讨论

IF 2.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Ayoub Boutaghane, A. Arabi, N. Ibrahim-Rassoul, A. Al-sarkhi, A. Azzi
{"title":"利用现有段塞流含液率模型预测水平段塞-段塞流过渡的分析、比较和讨论","authors":"Ayoub Boutaghane, A. Arabi, N. Ibrahim-Rassoul, A. Al-sarkhi, A. Azzi","doi":"10.1115/1.4056889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In horizontal configuration, the gas-liquid intermittent flow can be plug or slug flows. Different works have demonstrated that the two-phase flow pattern, despite their similarity, are different. Thus, it is important to differentiate between them in order to develop more robust predictive models. The limit of the existing model to predict the plug-to-slug flows transition were demonstrated firstly. After that, eleven existing slug liquid holdup (HLS) models were used in order to test their potential utilization for predicting the plug-to-slug flows transition. Using HLS = 0.9 as the criterion to distinguish between the two regimes, the relationship between the superficial velocities of the two phases was generated. The obtained transition lines were compared with visual observations collected from several published works in order to test the predictions of each model, and for different operating conditions. It was concluded in this paper that the slug liquid holdup models can be easily used for this purpose. Meanwhile, the prediction level of each model depends on the pipe diameter and the viscosity of the liquid phase.","PeriodicalId":15676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy Resources Technology-transactions of The Asme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis, comparison and discussion on the utilization of the existing slug liquid holdup models to predict the horizontal gas-liquid plug-to-slug flow transition\",\"authors\":\"Ayoub Boutaghane, A. Arabi, N. Ibrahim-Rassoul, A. Al-sarkhi, A. Azzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4056889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In horizontal configuration, the gas-liquid intermittent flow can be plug or slug flows. Different works have demonstrated that the two-phase flow pattern, despite their similarity, are different. Thus, it is important to differentiate between them in order to develop more robust predictive models. The limit of the existing model to predict the plug-to-slug flows transition were demonstrated firstly. After that, eleven existing slug liquid holdup (HLS) models were used in order to test their potential utilization for predicting the plug-to-slug flows transition. Using HLS = 0.9 as the criterion to distinguish between the two regimes, the relationship between the superficial velocities of the two phases was generated. The obtained transition lines were compared with visual observations collected from several published works in order to test the predictions of each model, and for different operating conditions. It was concluded in this paper that the slug liquid holdup models can be easily used for this purpose. Meanwhile, the prediction level of each model depends on the pipe diameter and the viscosity of the liquid phase.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Energy Resources Technology-transactions of The Asme\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Energy Resources Technology-transactions of The Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056889\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy Resources Technology-transactions of The Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056889","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在水平结构中,气液间歇流动可以是塞流或段塞流。不同的研究表明,尽管两相流型相似,但它们是不同的。因此,为了开发更健壮的预测模型,区分它们是很重要的。首先论证了现有模型在预测桥塞-段塞流过渡时的局限性。在此之后,研究人员使用了11个现有的段塞流含液率(HLS)模型,以测试它们在预测桥塞-段塞流过渡方面的应用潜力。以HLS = 0.9作为区分两种状态的判据,得到了两相表面速度之间的关系。将获得的过渡线与从几篇已发表的作品中收集的视觉观察结果进行比较,以测试每个模型的预测结果,以及不同的操作条件。本文的结论是,段塞流含液率模型可以很容易地用于这一目的。同时,各模型的预测水平取决于管径和液相粘度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis, comparison and discussion on the utilization of the existing slug liquid holdup models to predict the horizontal gas-liquid plug-to-slug flow transition
In horizontal configuration, the gas-liquid intermittent flow can be plug or slug flows. Different works have demonstrated that the two-phase flow pattern, despite their similarity, are different. Thus, it is important to differentiate between them in order to develop more robust predictive models. The limit of the existing model to predict the plug-to-slug flows transition were demonstrated firstly. After that, eleven existing slug liquid holdup (HLS) models were used in order to test their potential utilization for predicting the plug-to-slug flows transition. Using HLS = 0.9 as the criterion to distinguish between the two regimes, the relationship between the superficial velocities of the two phases was generated. The obtained transition lines were compared with visual observations collected from several published works in order to test the predictions of each model, and for different operating conditions. It was concluded in this paper that the slug liquid holdup models can be easily used for this purpose. Meanwhile, the prediction level of each model depends on the pipe diameter and the viscosity of the liquid phase.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
30.00%
发文量
213
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Specific areas of importance including, but not limited to: Fundamentals of thermodynamics such as energy, entropy and exergy, laws of thermodynamics; Thermoeconomics; Alternative and renewable energy sources; Internal combustion engines; (Geo) thermal energy storage and conversion systems; Fundamental combustion of fuels; Energy resource recovery from biomass and solid wastes; Carbon capture; Land and offshore wells drilling; Production and reservoir engineering;, Economics of energy resource exploitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信