强奸罪中指示性证据认定的复杂性

N. Yuliartini, Wita Setyaningrum, D. Mangku
{"title":"强奸罪中指示性证据认定的复杂性","authors":"N. Yuliartini, Wita Setyaningrum, D. Mangku","doi":"10.31603/variajusticia.v17i1.4368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of rape cases in Indonesia has resulted in social unrest, especially among women and children. Sometimes, judges have difficulty determining indicative evidence of rape cases. This study aims to analyze the strength of the evidence as consideration for judges in the criminal case of rape. This research is normative legal research. The data used in this research is secondary data obtained through a literature study and analyzed juridically normative based on a statutory and conceptual approach. The legal materials used in this research are primary and secondary legal materials. The study results show that rape is the most difficult crime to prove, considering that this kind of crime is often committed in places where it is difficult to find witnesses. Judges experience difficulties in concretely explaining evidence. Even in court practice often experience difficulties in applying it. These difficulties can then have implications for the decision that the judge will release because the decision is dominated by the judge's verdict, which may be excessive. Indicative evidence is the only indirect evidence among other evidence formulated in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code.","PeriodicalId":31904,"journal":{"name":"Varia Justicia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Complexity of Determining Indicative Evidence in The Rape Criminal Act\",\"authors\":\"N. Yuliartini, Wita Setyaningrum, D. Mangku\",\"doi\":\"10.31603/variajusticia.v17i1.4368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rise of rape cases in Indonesia has resulted in social unrest, especially among women and children. Sometimes, judges have difficulty determining indicative evidence of rape cases. This study aims to analyze the strength of the evidence as consideration for judges in the criminal case of rape. This research is normative legal research. The data used in this research is secondary data obtained through a literature study and analyzed juridically normative based on a statutory and conceptual approach. The legal materials used in this research are primary and secondary legal materials. The study results show that rape is the most difficult crime to prove, considering that this kind of crime is often committed in places where it is difficult to find witnesses. Judges experience difficulties in concretely explaining evidence. Even in court practice often experience difficulties in applying it. These difficulties can then have implications for the decision that the judge will release because the decision is dominated by the judge's verdict, which may be excessive. Indicative evidence is the only indirect evidence among other evidence formulated in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Varia Justicia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Varia Justicia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31603/variajusticia.v17i1.4368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Varia Justicia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31603/variajusticia.v17i1.4368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度尼西亚强奸案的增加导致了社会动荡,特别是在妇女和儿童中。有时,法官难以确定强奸案件的指示性证据。本研究旨在分析证据的强度,作为法官在强奸刑事案件中考虑的因素。本研究属于规范法学研究。本研究中使用的数据是通过文献研究获得的二手数据,并基于法定和概念方法分析了法律规范。本研究使用的法律资料分为一级法律资料和二级法律资料。研究结果表明,强奸是最难证明的犯罪,因为这类犯罪通常发生在难以找到证人的地方。法官在具体解释证据方面遇到困难。即使在法庭实践中也经常遇到应用困难。然后,这些困难可能对法官将作出的决定产生影响,因为决定是由法官的判决决定的,这可能是过分的。指示性证据是我国刑事诉讼法第一百八十四条规定的证据中唯一的间接证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Complexity of Determining Indicative Evidence in The Rape Criminal Act
The rise of rape cases in Indonesia has resulted in social unrest, especially among women and children. Sometimes, judges have difficulty determining indicative evidence of rape cases. This study aims to analyze the strength of the evidence as consideration for judges in the criminal case of rape. This research is normative legal research. The data used in this research is secondary data obtained through a literature study and analyzed juridically normative based on a statutory and conceptual approach. The legal materials used in this research are primary and secondary legal materials. The study results show that rape is the most difficult crime to prove, considering that this kind of crime is often committed in places where it is difficult to find witnesses. Judges experience difficulties in concretely explaining evidence. Even in court practice often experience difficulties in applying it. These difficulties can then have implications for the decision that the judge will release because the decision is dominated by the judge's verdict, which may be excessive. Indicative evidence is the only indirect evidence among other evidence formulated in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信