T. Kanda, M. Masuda, M. Asai, O. Iida, S. Okamoto, T. Ishihara, Kiyonori Nanto, T. Tsujimura, Y. Matsuda, Y. Hata, H. Uematsu, T. Mano
{"title":"初始消融术时左心房低压面积过大,即使多次手术后临床结果也不佳。","authors":"T. Kanda, M. Masuda, M. Asai, O. Iida, S. Okamoto, T. Ishihara, Kiyonori Nanto, T. Tsujimura, Y. Matsuda, Y. Hata, H. Uematsu, T. Mano","doi":"10.22541/AU.161547823.37636408/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nSome patients fail to respond to persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) catheter ablation in spite of multiple procedures and ablation strategies, including low voltage area (LVA)-guided, linear, and complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)-guided ablation procedures. We hypothesized that LVA extent could predict non-responseto Pe AF catheter ablation in spite of multiple procedures.\n\n\nMethods\nThis study included 510 patients undergoing initial ablation procedures for PeAF. LVAs were defined as regions with bipolar peak-to-peak voltages of <0.50 mV after PVI during sinus rhythm. Patients were categorized by LVA size into groups A(0-5 cm2), B (5-20 cm2), and C (over 20 cm2). The primary endpoint was AF-free survival after the last procedure.\n\n\nResults\nDuring a median follow-up of 25 (17, 36) months, AF recurrence was observed in 101 (20%) patients after 1.4±0.6 ablation procedures (maximum 4). Comparison of clinical outcomes after multiple procedures in the three groups showed that the results depended on the extent of LVA. Multivariate analysis of AF-free survival after the last procedure showed that LVAs > 20 cm2 was an independent factor associated with AF recurrence after the final procedure(Hazard ratio, 7.94; 95% confidence interval, 2.91 to 21.67, P <0.001).\n\n\nConclusions\nExtensive LVA after initial PVI was associated with poor clinical benefit despite multiple catheter based ablations.","PeriodicalId":15072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","volume":"14 2 1","pages":"20200491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extensive Left Atrial Low-Voltage Area During Initial Ablation is Associated with A Poor Clinical Outcome Even Following Multiple Procedures.\",\"authors\":\"T. Kanda, M. Masuda, M. Asai, O. Iida, S. Okamoto, T. Ishihara, Kiyonori Nanto, T. Tsujimura, Y. Matsuda, Y. Hata, H. Uematsu, T. Mano\",\"doi\":\"10.22541/AU.161547823.37636408/V1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nSome patients fail to respond to persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) catheter ablation in spite of multiple procedures and ablation strategies, including low voltage area (LVA)-guided, linear, and complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)-guided ablation procedures. We hypothesized that LVA extent could predict non-responseto Pe AF catheter ablation in spite of multiple procedures.\\n\\n\\nMethods\\nThis study included 510 patients undergoing initial ablation procedures for PeAF. LVAs were defined as regions with bipolar peak-to-peak voltages of <0.50 mV after PVI during sinus rhythm. Patients were categorized by LVA size into groups A(0-5 cm2), B (5-20 cm2), and C (over 20 cm2). The primary endpoint was AF-free survival after the last procedure.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nDuring a median follow-up of 25 (17, 36) months, AF recurrence was observed in 101 (20%) patients after 1.4±0.6 ablation procedures (maximum 4). Comparison of clinical outcomes after multiple procedures in the three groups showed that the results depended on the extent of LVA. Multivariate analysis of AF-free survival after the last procedure showed that LVAs > 20 cm2 was an independent factor associated with AF recurrence after the final procedure(Hazard ratio, 7.94; 95% confidence interval, 2.91 to 21.67, P <0.001).\\n\\n\\nConclusions\\nExtensive LVA after initial PVI was associated with poor clinical benefit despite multiple catheter based ablations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of atrial fibrillation\",\"volume\":\"14 2 1\",\"pages\":\"20200491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of atrial fibrillation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22541/AU.161547823.37636408/V1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22541/AU.161547823.37636408/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Extensive Left Atrial Low-Voltage Area During Initial Ablation is Associated with A Poor Clinical Outcome Even Following Multiple Procedures.
Background
Some patients fail to respond to persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) catheter ablation in spite of multiple procedures and ablation strategies, including low voltage area (LVA)-guided, linear, and complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)-guided ablation procedures. We hypothesized that LVA extent could predict non-responseto Pe AF catheter ablation in spite of multiple procedures.
Methods
This study included 510 patients undergoing initial ablation procedures for PeAF. LVAs were defined as regions with bipolar peak-to-peak voltages of <0.50 mV after PVI during sinus rhythm. Patients were categorized by LVA size into groups A(0-5 cm2), B (5-20 cm2), and C (over 20 cm2). The primary endpoint was AF-free survival after the last procedure.
Results
During a median follow-up of 25 (17, 36) months, AF recurrence was observed in 101 (20%) patients after 1.4±0.6 ablation procedures (maximum 4). Comparison of clinical outcomes after multiple procedures in the three groups showed that the results depended on the extent of LVA. Multivariate analysis of AF-free survival after the last procedure showed that LVAs > 20 cm2 was an independent factor associated with AF recurrence after the final procedure(Hazard ratio, 7.94; 95% confidence interval, 2.91 to 21.67, P <0.001).
Conclusions
Extensive LVA after initial PVI was associated with poor clinical benefit despite multiple catheter based ablations.