乌托邦半岛:当代俄语诗歌对吞并克里米亚的反应

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY
Polina Barskova
{"title":"乌托邦半岛:当代俄语诗歌对吞并克里米亚的反应","authors":"Polina Barskova","doi":"10.1080/13501674.2022.2076599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article, I seek to trace two main agendas of contemporary Russophone poetry about Crimea: namely, to react to the re-annexation of 2014 by Russia, and, in so doing, to inscribe this event into the preceding poetic tradition of writing on Crimea in terms of continuity or juxtaposition. Analysis of the anthology Our Crimea (2014) reveals intense polyphony, from the problematization of the notion of historical belonging to attempts to anesthetize the painful present with texts of nostalgia for the Crimean idealized past. Following this, close readings of two poem cycles about Crimea, one authored by Aleksandr Kushner and the other by Boris Khersonsky, show that, despite their opposing political views, both poets express their ideas by means of recycling various tropes of Crimea’s representation in Russian Modernist poetry. In sum, Crimea remains not only the focus of geopolitical conflict, but also a highly contested literary site for Russophone poets.","PeriodicalId":42363,"journal":{"name":"East European Jewish Affairs","volume":"51 1","pages":"282 - 296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Peninsula of Utopias: Reactions to the Annexation of Crimea in Contemporary Russophone Poetry\",\"authors\":\"Polina Barskova\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13501674.2022.2076599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this article, I seek to trace two main agendas of contemporary Russophone poetry about Crimea: namely, to react to the re-annexation of 2014 by Russia, and, in so doing, to inscribe this event into the preceding poetic tradition of writing on Crimea in terms of continuity or juxtaposition. Analysis of the anthology Our Crimea (2014) reveals intense polyphony, from the problematization of the notion of historical belonging to attempts to anesthetize the painful present with texts of nostalgia for the Crimean idealized past. Following this, close readings of two poem cycles about Crimea, one authored by Aleksandr Kushner and the other by Boris Khersonsky, show that, despite their opposing political views, both poets express their ideas by means of recycling various tropes of Crimea’s representation in Russian Modernist poetry. In sum, Crimea remains not only the focus of geopolitical conflict, but also a highly contested literary site for Russophone poets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East European Jewish Affairs\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"282 - 296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East European Jewish Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13501674.2022.2076599\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Jewish Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13501674.2022.2076599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在这篇文章中,我试图追溯当代俄语诗歌关于克里米亚的两个主要议程:即对2014年俄罗斯重新吞并克里米亚的反应,以及在这样做的过程中,将这一事件以连续性或并置性的方式写入之前关于克里米亚的诗歌传统。对选集《我们的克里米亚》(2014)的分析揭示了强烈的复调,从历史归属概念的问题化,到试图用对克里米亚理想化过去的怀旧文本麻醉痛苦的现在。在此之后,仔细阅读两个关于克里米亚的诗歌周期,一个由亚历山大·库什纳创作,另一个由鲍里斯·赫森斯基创作,表明尽管他们的政治观点相反,但两位诗人都通过重复俄罗斯现代主义诗歌中克里米亚代表的各种比喻来表达他们的想法。总之,克里米亚不仅是地缘政治冲突的焦点,也是俄语诗人竞争激烈的文学场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Peninsula of Utopias: Reactions to the Annexation of Crimea in Contemporary Russophone Poetry
ABSTRACT In this article, I seek to trace two main agendas of contemporary Russophone poetry about Crimea: namely, to react to the re-annexation of 2014 by Russia, and, in so doing, to inscribe this event into the preceding poetic tradition of writing on Crimea in terms of continuity or juxtaposition. Analysis of the anthology Our Crimea (2014) reveals intense polyphony, from the problematization of the notion of historical belonging to attempts to anesthetize the painful present with texts of nostalgia for the Crimean idealized past. Following this, close readings of two poem cycles about Crimea, one authored by Aleksandr Kushner and the other by Boris Khersonsky, show that, despite their opposing political views, both poets express their ideas by means of recycling various tropes of Crimea’s representation in Russian Modernist poetry. In sum, Crimea remains not only the focus of geopolitical conflict, but also a highly contested literary site for Russophone poets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信