跨越蓝色阴影:与国际海洋可持续发展小组共同构建知识

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Leopoldo Cavaleri Gerhardinger, Tanya Brodie Rudolph, F. Gaill, G. Mortyn, Eloise Littley, Adrien Vincent, Dannieli Firme Herbst, P. Ziveri, Louise Jeanneau, M. Laamanen, M. Cavallé, Jay Marisca Gietzelt, M. Glaser, Mouna Chambon, Juliette Jacquemont, Samiya Ahmed Selim, C. Brugere, Cristina Brito, Laura M. Pereira, Sandra Amezaga, Nicolás Fernández Muñoz, Lucas Becquet, A. Lalo, A. C. Colonese
{"title":"跨越蓝色阴影:与国际海洋可持续发展小组共同构建知识","authors":"Leopoldo Cavaleri Gerhardinger, Tanya Brodie Rudolph, F. Gaill, G. Mortyn, Eloise Littley, Adrien Vincent, Dannieli Firme Herbst, P. Ziveri, Louise Jeanneau, M. Laamanen, M. Cavallé, Jay Marisca Gietzelt, M. Glaser, Mouna Chambon, Juliette Jacquemont, Samiya Ahmed Selim, C. Brugere, Cristina Brito, Laura M. Pereira, Sandra Amezaga, Nicolás Fernández Muñoz, Lucas Becquet, A. Lalo, A. C. Colonese","doi":"10.1080/08920753.2023.2244082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The efficacy of global environmental assessments in informing and shaping ocean and coastal management is hampered by recognized gaps in global science endeavours. In order to bridge these gaps, and secure inclusive and equitable knowledge co-construction by ocean stakeholders, the International Panel for Ocean Sustainability (IPOS) is emerging. Here we present the outcomes of the “Bridging Shades of Blue Workshop” held in Spain 2023. A diverse group of Ocean knowledge holders, including policymakers, small-scale fishers, marine social scientists and ocean lawyers gathered to reflect on the key features, challenges, strategies, actors to be involved, as well as pathways to balance power for advancing an inclusive and equitable IPOS. As a result, six foundational dimensions of IPOS’s institutional identity were proposed as IPOS ID cards: 1) Diversifying Ocean Knowledge Systems, 2) Widening the Range of Methods for Ocean Knowledge Production, 3) Informing Decision-making, 4) Engaging at the Interfaces of Knowledge with Decision-making, 5) Communicating, Learning, and Sharing Knowledge, 6) Measuring Progress and Evaluating Success. We conclude by emphasizing IPOS’s potential role as a beacon for inclusive, equitable, and sustainable ocean governance.","PeriodicalId":50995,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Management","volume":"51 1","pages":"244 - 264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging Shades of Blue: Co-constructing Knowledge with the International Panel for Ocean Sustainability\",\"authors\":\"Leopoldo Cavaleri Gerhardinger, Tanya Brodie Rudolph, F. Gaill, G. Mortyn, Eloise Littley, Adrien Vincent, Dannieli Firme Herbst, P. Ziveri, Louise Jeanneau, M. Laamanen, M. Cavallé, Jay Marisca Gietzelt, M. Glaser, Mouna Chambon, Juliette Jacquemont, Samiya Ahmed Selim, C. Brugere, Cristina Brito, Laura M. Pereira, Sandra Amezaga, Nicolás Fernández Muñoz, Lucas Becquet, A. Lalo, A. C. Colonese\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08920753.2023.2244082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The efficacy of global environmental assessments in informing and shaping ocean and coastal management is hampered by recognized gaps in global science endeavours. In order to bridge these gaps, and secure inclusive and equitable knowledge co-construction by ocean stakeholders, the International Panel for Ocean Sustainability (IPOS) is emerging. Here we present the outcomes of the “Bridging Shades of Blue Workshop” held in Spain 2023. A diverse group of Ocean knowledge holders, including policymakers, small-scale fishers, marine social scientists and ocean lawyers gathered to reflect on the key features, challenges, strategies, actors to be involved, as well as pathways to balance power for advancing an inclusive and equitable IPOS. As a result, six foundational dimensions of IPOS’s institutional identity were proposed as IPOS ID cards: 1) Diversifying Ocean Knowledge Systems, 2) Widening the Range of Methods for Ocean Knowledge Production, 3) Informing Decision-making, 4) Engaging at the Interfaces of Knowledge with Decision-making, 5) Communicating, Learning, and Sharing Knowledge, 6) Measuring Progress and Evaluating Success. We conclude by emphasizing IPOS’s potential role as a beacon for inclusive, equitable, and sustainable ocean governance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coastal Management\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"244 - 264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coastal Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2023.2244082\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2023.2244082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要全球科学工作中公认的差距阻碍了全球环境评估在告知和塑造海洋和沿海管理方面的效力。为了弥补这些差距,确保海洋利益攸关方进行包容性和公平的知识共建,国际海洋可持续性小组(IPOS)正在成立。在这里,我们介绍2023年在西班牙举行的“蓝色的桥接阴影研讨会”的成果。包括政策制定者、小规模渔民、海洋社会科学家和海洋律师在内的一批不同的海洋知识持有者聚集在一起,反思关键特征、挑战、战略、参与的行为者,以及为推动包容性和公平的首次公开募股平衡力量的途径。因此,IPOS机构身份的六个基本维度被提出为IPOS身份证:1)多样化海洋知识系统,2)拓宽海洋知识生产方法的范围,3)告知决策,4)参与知识与决策的接口,5)交流、学习和共享知识,6)衡量进展和评估成功。最后,我们强调了首次公开募股作为包容性、公平和可持续海洋治理灯塔的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging Shades of Blue: Co-constructing Knowledge with the International Panel for Ocean Sustainability
Abstract The efficacy of global environmental assessments in informing and shaping ocean and coastal management is hampered by recognized gaps in global science endeavours. In order to bridge these gaps, and secure inclusive and equitable knowledge co-construction by ocean stakeholders, the International Panel for Ocean Sustainability (IPOS) is emerging. Here we present the outcomes of the “Bridging Shades of Blue Workshop” held in Spain 2023. A diverse group of Ocean knowledge holders, including policymakers, small-scale fishers, marine social scientists and ocean lawyers gathered to reflect on the key features, challenges, strategies, actors to be involved, as well as pathways to balance power for advancing an inclusive and equitable IPOS. As a result, six foundational dimensions of IPOS’s institutional identity were proposed as IPOS ID cards: 1) Diversifying Ocean Knowledge Systems, 2) Widening the Range of Methods for Ocean Knowledge Production, 3) Informing Decision-making, 4) Engaging at the Interfaces of Knowledge with Decision-making, 5) Communicating, Learning, and Sharing Knowledge, 6) Measuring Progress and Evaluating Success. We conclude by emphasizing IPOS’s potential role as a beacon for inclusive, equitable, and sustainable ocean governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Coastal Management
Coastal Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Coastal Management is an international peer-reviewed, applied research journal dedicated to exploring the technical, applied ecological, legal, political, social, and policy issues relating to the use of coastal and ocean resources and environments on a global scale. The journal presents timely information on management tools and techniques as well as recent findings from research and analysis that bear directly on management and policy. Findings must be grounded in the current peer reviewed literature and relevant studies. Articles must contain a clear and relevant management component. Preference is given to studies of interest to an international readership, but case studies are accepted if conclusions are derived from acceptable evaluative methods, reference to comparable cases, and related to peer reviewed studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信