事件研究中的稳健方法:经验证据和理论意义

N. Sorokina, David E. Booth, John H. Thornton
{"title":"事件研究中的稳健方法:经验证据和理论意义","authors":"N. Sorokina, David E. Booth, John H. Thornton","doi":"10.6339/JDS.2013.11(3).1166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We apply methodology robust to outliers to an existing event study of the eect of U.S. nancial reform on the stock markets of the 10 largest world economies, and obtain results that dier from the original OLS results in important ways. This nding underlines the importance of han- dling outliers in event studies. We further review closely the population of outliers identied using Cook's distance and nd that many of the out- liers lie within the event windows. We acknowledge that those data points lead to inaccurate regression tting; however, we cannot remove them since they carry valuable information regarding the event eect. We study further the residuals of the outliers within event windows and nd that the resid- uals change with application of M-estimators and MM-estimators; in most cases they became larger, meaning the main prediction equation is pulled back towards the main data population and further from the outliers and indicating more proper tting. We support our empirical results by pseudo- simulation experiments and nd signicant improvement in determination of both types of the event eect abnormal returns and change in systematic risk. We conclude that robust methods are important for obtaining accurate measurement of event eects in event studies.","PeriodicalId":73699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of data science : JDS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robust Methods in Event Studies: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Implications\",\"authors\":\"N. Sorokina, David E. Booth, John H. Thornton\",\"doi\":\"10.6339/JDS.2013.11(3).1166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We apply methodology robust to outliers to an existing event study of the eect of U.S. nancial reform on the stock markets of the 10 largest world economies, and obtain results that dier from the original OLS results in important ways. This nding underlines the importance of han- dling outliers in event studies. We further review closely the population of outliers identied using Cook's distance and nd that many of the out- liers lie within the event windows. We acknowledge that those data points lead to inaccurate regression tting; however, we cannot remove them since they carry valuable information regarding the event eect. We study further the residuals of the outliers within event windows and nd that the resid- uals change with application of M-estimators and MM-estimators; in most cases they became larger, meaning the main prediction equation is pulled back towards the main data population and further from the outliers and indicating more proper tting. We support our empirical results by pseudo- simulation experiments and nd signicant improvement in determination of both types of the event eect abnormal returns and change in systematic risk. We conclude that robust methods are important for obtaining accurate measurement of event eects in event studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of data science : JDS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of data science : JDS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6339/JDS.2013.11(3).1166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of data science : JDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6339/JDS.2013.11(3).1166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

我们对美国金融改革对世界10大经济体股票市场影响的现有事件研究应用了稳健的异常值方法,并在重要方面获得了与原始OLS结果相似的结果。这一结论强调了在事件研究中处理异常值的重要性。我们进一步仔细审查了使用库克距离确定的离群值的总体,并且发现许多离群值位于事件窗口内。我们承认这些数据点会导致不准确的回归;但是,我们不能删除它们,因为它们携带有关事件效果的有价值的信息。进一步研究了事件窗内异常值的残差,发现残差随m估计量和mm估计量的应用而变化;在大多数情况下,它们变得更大,这意味着主要的预测方程被拉回主要数据群体,远离离群值,表明更适当的调整。我们通过伪模拟实验来支持我们的实证结果,并在确定两种类型的事件影响异常收益和系统风险变化方面取得了显著的进步。我们得出结论,在事件研究中,可靠的方法对于获得事件效应的准确测量是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robust Methods in Event Studies: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Implications
We apply methodology robust to outliers to an existing event study of the eect of U.S. nancial reform on the stock markets of the 10 largest world economies, and obtain results that dier from the original OLS results in important ways. This nding underlines the importance of han- dling outliers in event studies. We further review closely the population of outliers identied using Cook's distance and nd that many of the out- liers lie within the event windows. We acknowledge that those data points lead to inaccurate regression tting; however, we cannot remove them since they carry valuable information regarding the event eect. We study further the residuals of the outliers within event windows and nd that the resid- uals change with application of M-estimators and MM-estimators; in most cases they became larger, meaning the main prediction equation is pulled back towards the main data population and further from the outliers and indicating more proper tting. We support our empirical results by pseudo- simulation experiments and nd signicant improvement in determination of both types of the event eect abnormal returns and change in systematic risk. We conclude that robust methods are important for obtaining accurate measurement of event eects in event studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信