家族史与人生写作

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE
T. Evans, Marian Lorrison
{"title":"家族史与人生写作","authors":"T. Evans, Marian Lorrison","doi":"10.1080/14484528.2023.2130024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Special Issue of Life Writing emerged from a workshop initially co-organised by Jerome de Groot and Tanya Evans. They planned to hold this in collaboration with the Society of Australian Genealogists (SAG) in Kent Street, Sydney, Australia in April 2020. Evans had previously collaborated with SAG on several occasions since 2012 through different research projects on family history (Evans 2015, 2022). These collaborations included interactive talks, help with recruitment on family history research projects, the dissemination of research on the practice and meanings of family history and networking among family historians. At the time, de Groot and Evans were co-authoring an article on the value of collaborative public history projects in Australia and Britain, both focused on their international engagements with the family history community (Evans, de Groot, and Stallard Forthcoming). They held two successful, lively, interactive, participatory and well-attended workshops including international scholarly researchers on family history together with family historians at Manchester City Library in the UK in September 2017 (de Groot and Evans 2017) and at the State Library of New South Wales in Sydney in July 2018 (Evans and de Groot 2019). Covid 19 prevented Jerome’s travel to Australia in early 2020 and the whole world went into lockdown soon after. We hoped the workshop might encourage everyone to re-evaluate the research practices and interests of family historians which we knew to be often scathingly defined by others as unscientific, uncritical, emotional and of little value to the academy or anyone else bar individual researchers’ families. Nonetheless, family history has become phenomenally popular world-wide. It is through their families that millions of people, all over the world, first engage with the subject of history, listening to family stories over the years and being told about where they sit in their family trees. Psychologists have revealed that these family stories about the past are crucial to an individual’s sense of identity and well-being (Moore, Rosenthal, and Robinson 2020). Family history is understood by a range of sociologists and human geographers in Europe and Australia to have an important role in identity-formation (Bottero 2015; Kramer 2011). As Nash suggests, family history individualises the past (Nash 2002). National surveys across the globe have revealed the overwhelming centrality of family to people’s understanding of history everywhere (Ashton and Hamilton 2003, 135; Conrad et al. 2013). However, as Evans has demonstrated in her work, family historians are an enormous and still often neglected group of historical researchers. They have a strongly articulated sense of their practice, and a well-developed set of methodologies and research systems. They are a community who are mostly but not always situated outside the academy, often marginalised by the mainstream. They have been dismissed for their naiveté and amateurism and are ridiculed for seeking emotional connections with the past lives of their forebears (Evans 2022). In this Special Issue we continue to interrogate these assumptions here and show how scholars are engaging with family history and how family history is enabling a huge number of people to think historically and to produce distinctive forms of historical understanding that","PeriodicalId":43797,"journal":{"name":"Life Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family History and Life Writing\",\"authors\":\"T. Evans, Marian Lorrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14484528.2023.2130024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Special Issue of Life Writing emerged from a workshop initially co-organised by Jerome de Groot and Tanya Evans. They planned to hold this in collaboration with the Society of Australian Genealogists (SAG) in Kent Street, Sydney, Australia in April 2020. Evans had previously collaborated with SAG on several occasions since 2012 through different research projects on family history (Evans 2015, 2022). These collaborations included interactive talks, help with recruitment on family history research projects, the dissemination of research on the practice and meanings of family history and networking among family historians. At the time, de Groot and Evans were co-authoring an article on the value of collaborative public history projects in Australia and Britain, both focused on their international engagements with the family history community (Evans, de Groot, and Stallard Forthcoming). They held two successful, lively, interactive, participatory and well-attended workshops including international scholarly researchers on family history together with family historians at Manchester City Library in the UK in September 2017 (de Groot and Evans 2017) and at the State Library of New South Wales in Sydney in July 2018 (Evans and de Groot 2019). Covid 19 prevented Jerome’s travel to Australia in early 2020 and the whole world went into lockdown soon after. We hoped the workshop might encourage everyone to re-evaluate the research practices and interests of family historians which we knew to be often scathingly defined by others as unscientific, uncritical, emotional and of little value to the academy or anyone else bar individual researchers’ families. Nonetheless, family history has become phenomenally popular world-wide. It is through their families that millions of people, all over the world, first engage with the subject of history, listening to family stories over the years and being told about where they sit in their family trees. Psychologists have revealed that these family stories about the past are crucial to an individual’s sense of identity and well-being (Moore, Rosenthal, and Robinson 2020). Family history is understood by a range of sociologists and human geographers in Europe and Australia to have an important role in identity-formation (Bottero 2015; Kramer 2011). As Nash suggests, family history individualises the past (Nash 2002). National surveys across the globe have revealed the overwhelming centrality of family to people’s understanding of history everywhere (Ashton and Hamilton 2003, 135; Conrad et al. 2013). However, as Evans has demonstrated in her work, family historians are an enormous and still often neglected group of historical researchers. They have a strongly articulated sense of their practice, and a well-developed set of methodologies and research systems. They are a community who are mostly but not always situated outside the academy, often marginalised by the mainstream. They have been dismissed for their naiveté and amateurism and are ridiculed for seeking emotional connections with the past lives of their forebears (Evans 2022). In this Special Issue we continue to interrogate these assumptions here and show how scholars are engaging with family history and how family history is enabling a huge number of people to think historically and to produce distinctive forms of historical understanding that\",\"PeriodicalId\":43797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Life Writing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Life Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14484528.2023.2130024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14484528.2023.2130024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本期《生活写作特刊》源自杰罗姆·德·格鲁特和塔尼娅·埃文斯最初共同组织的研讨会。他们计划于2020年4月在澳大利亚悉尼肯特街与澳大利亚家谱学家协会(SAG)合作举办这次活动。自2012年以来,Evans曾多次与SAG合作,通过不同的家族史研究项目(Evans 2015,2022)。这些合作包括互动式会谈、帮助招募家族史研究项目人员、传播关于家族史的实践和意义的研究以及在家族史学家之间建立联系。当时,德格鲁特和埃文斯共同撰写了一篇关于澳大利亚和英国合作公共历史项目价值的文章,他们都专注于与家族史社区的国际合作(埃文斯,德格鲁特和斯托拉德即将出版)。他们于2017年9月在英国曼彻斯特城市图书馆(de Groot and Evans 2017)和2018年7月在悉尼新南威尔士州国家图书馆(Evans and de Groot 2019)举办了两次成功的、生动的、互动的、参与性的、参加人数众多的研讨会,包括国际学术研究人员和家庭历史学家。2020年初,新冠肺炎阻止了杰罗姆前往澳大利亚,不久之后,全世界都进入了封锁状态。我们希望研讨会能鼓励每个人重新评估家庭历史学家的研究实践和兴趣,我们知道,这些研究经常被其他人严厉地定义为不科学、不批判、情绪化,对学院或除了个别研究人员的家庭之外的任何人都没有什么价值。尽管如此,家族史已经在世界范围内变得非常流行。正是通过他们的家庭,世界各地数以百万计的人第一次接触到历史这个主题,多年来听着家庭故事,被告知他们在家谱中所处的位置。心理学家透露,这些关于过去的家庭故事对一个人的认同感和幸福感至关重要(Moore, Rosenthal, and Robinson, 2020)。欧洲和澳大利亚的一系列社会学家和人文地理学家认为家族史在身份形成中起着重要作用(Bottero 2015;克莱默2011)。正如纳什所说,家族史使过去个人化(纳什2002)。全球范围内的全国性调查显示,家庭在世界各地人们对历史的理解中具有压倒性的中心地位(Ashton and Hamilton 2003, 135;Conrad et al. 2013)。然而,正如埃文斯在她的作品中所展示的那样,家族历史学家是一个庞大的,但仍然经常被忽视的历史研究群体。他们对自己的实践有强烈的清晰的认识,有一套完善的方法和研究体系。他们是一个大多数(但并非总是)处于学术界之外的群体,经常被主流边缘化。他们因天真和业余而被解雇,并因寻求与祖先前世的情感联系而受到嘲笑(Evans 2022)。在本期特刊中,我们将继续质疑这些假设,并展示学者们是如何参与家族史研究的,以及家族史是如何让很多人进行历史思考并产生独特的历史理解形式的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Family History and Life Writing
This Special Issue of Life Writing emerged from a workshop initially co-organised by Jerome de Groot and Tanya Evans. They planned to hold this in collaboration with the Society of Australian Genealogists (SAG) in Kent Street, Sydney, Australia in April 2020. Evans had previously collaborated with SAG on several occasions since 2012 through different research projects on family history (Evans 2015, 2022). These collaborations included interactive talks, help with recruitment on family history research projects, the dissemination of research on the practice and meanings of family history and networking among family historians. At the time, de Groot and Evans were co-authoring an article on the value of collaborative public history projects in Australia and Britain, both focused on their international engagements with the family history community (Evans, de Groot, and Stallard Forthcoming). They held two successful, lively, interactive, participatory and well-attended workshops including international scholarly researchers on family history together with family historians at Manchester City Library in the UK in September 2017 (de Groot and Evans 2017) and at the State Library of New South Wales in Sydney in July 2018 (Evans and de Groot 2019). Covid 19 prevented Jerome’s travel to Australia in early 2020 and the whole world went into lockdown soon after. We hoped the workshop might encourage everyone to re-evaluate the research practices and interests of family historians which we knew to be often scathingly defined by others as unscientific, uncritical, emotional and of little value to the academy or anyone else bar individual researchers’ families. Nonetheless, family history has become phenomenally popular world-wide. It is through their families that millions of people, all over the world, first engage with the subject of history, listening to family stories over the years and being told about where they sit in their family trees. Psychologists have revealed that these family stories about the past are crucial to an individual’s sense of identity and well-being (Moore, Rosenthal, and Robinson 2020). Family history is understood by a range of sociologists and human geographers in Europe and Australia to have an important role in identity-formation (Bottero 2015; Kramer 2011). As Nash suggests, family history individualises the past (Nash 2002). National surveys across the globe have revealed the overwhelming centrality of family to people’s understanding of history everywhere (Ashton and Hamilton 2003, 135; Conrad et al. 2013). However, as Evans has demonstrated in her work, family historians are an enormous and still often neglected group of historical researchers. They have a strongly articulated sense of their practice, and a well-developed set of methodologies and research systems. They are a community who are mostly but not always situated outside the academy, often marginalised by the mainstream. They have been dismissed for their naiveté and amateurism and are ridiculed for seeking emotional connections with the past lives of their forebears (Evans 2022). In this Special Issue we continue to interrogate these assumptions here and show how scholars are engaging with family history and how family history is enabling a huge number of people to think historically and to produce distinctive forms of historical understanding that
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Life Writing
Life Writing LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信