“标准经济理论”在竞争法诉讼中的作用及其辩护

Q4 Social Sciences
W. Ward
{"title":"“标准经济理论”在竞争法诉讼中的作用及其辩护","authors":"W. Ward","doi":"10.4337/clj.2022.02.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is typical in competition law-related litigation for damages claims to be brought by companies who have been overcharged for a product or service. A standard defence is that the claimants passed on the overcharge to buyers of their own products and services, thus reducing or eliminating their losses. Typically, ‘standard economic theory’ is cited to support this argument. However, standard economic theory offers no universal prediction for how firms will respond to a cost increase. Instead, economic theory says that the extent of pass on is dictated by a range of internal and external factors, ultimately implying a whole spectrum of possible rates of pass on.","PeriodicalId":36415,"journal":{"name":"Competition Law Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of ‘standard economic theory’ and the pass on defence in competition law-related litigation\",\"authors\":\"W. Ward\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/clj.2022.02.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is typical in competition law-related litigation for damages claims to be brought by companies who have been overcharged for a product or service. A standard defence is that the claimants passed on the overcharge to buyers of their own products and services, thus reducing or eliminating their losses. Typically, ‘standard economic theory’ is cited to support this argument. However, standard economic theory offers no universal prediction for how firms will respond to a cost increase. Instead, economic theory says that the extent of pass on is dictated by a range of internal and external factors, ultimately implying a whole spectrum of possible rates of pass on.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Competition Law Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Competition Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2022.02.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2022.02.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在竞争法相关诉讼中,因产品或服务被多收费的公司提出损害赔偿索赔是典型的。一个标准的辩护是,索赔人将超额收费转嫁给了他们自己产品和服务的买家,从而减少或消除了他们的损失。通常,“标准经济理论”被引用来支持这一论点。然而,标准的经济理论并没有提供企业将如何应对成本增加的普遍预测。相反,经济理论认为,传导的程度是由一系列内部和外部因素决定的,最终意味着可能的传导率的整个范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of ‘standard economic theory’ and the pass on defence in competition law-related litigation
It is typical in competition law-related litigation for damages claims to be brought by companies who have been overcharged for a product or service. A standard defence is that the claimants passed on the overcharge to buyers of their own products and services, thus reducing or eliminating their losses. Typically, ‘standard economic theory’ is cited to support this argument. However, standard economic theory offers no universal prediction for how firms will respond to a cost increase. Instead, economic theory says that the extent of pass on is dictated by a range of internal and external factors, ultimately implying a whole spectrum of possible rates of pass on.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Competition Law Journal
Competition Law Journal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信