英国打击暴力极端主义的范围和限度

IF 0.6 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Tahir Abbas
{"title":"英国打击暴力极端主义的范围和限度","authors":"Tahir Abbas","doi":"10.24241/rcai.2021.128.2.155/en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article situates the debate on the United Kingdom’s Prevent policy in the broader framework of the global paradigm for countering violent extremism (CVE), which appeared at the end of 2015. It argues that omission of a nuanced focus on the social, cultural, economic, and political characteristics of radicalised people has led to a tendency to introduce blanket measures which, inadvertently and indirectly, have had harmful results. Moreover, although Prevent has been the fundamental element of the British government’s counterterrorist strategy since 2006, it confuses legitimate political resistance of young British Muslims with signs of violent extremism, thus giving credence to the argument that Prevent is a form of social engineering which, in the last instance, pacifies resistance by reaffirming the status quo in the country’s domestic and foreign policy.","PeriodicalId":43375,"journal":{"name":"Revista CIDOB d Afers Internationals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The scope and limits of combatting violent extremism in the United Kingdom\",\"authors\":\"Tahir Abbas\",\"doi\":\"10.24241/rcai.2021.128.2.155/en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article situates the debate on the United Kingdom’s Prevent policy in the broader framework of the global paradigm for countering violent extremism (CVE), which appeared at the end of 2015. It argues that omission of a nuanced focus on the social, cultural, economic, and political characteristics of radicalised people has led to a tendency to introduce blanket measures which, inadvertently and indirectly, have had harmful results. Moreover, although Prevent has been the fundamental element of the British government’s counterterrorist strategy since 2006, it confuses legitimate political resistance of young British Muslims with signs of violent extremism, thus giving credence to the argument that Prevent is a form of social engineering which, in the last instance, pacifies resistance by reaffirming the status quo in the country’s domestic and foreign policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista CIDOB d Afers Internationals\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista CIDOB d Afers Internationals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2021.128.2.155/en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista CIDOB d Afers Internationals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2021.128.2.155/en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将关于英国预防政策的辩论置于2015年底出现的全球打击暴力极端主义范式(CVE)的更广泛框架中。它认为,对激进人士的社会、文化、经济和政治特征的细致关注的缺失导致了一种倾向,即引入一揽子措施,而这些措施无意中或间接地产生了有害的结果。此外,尽管自2006年以来,“预防”一直是英国政府反恐战略的基本要素,但它混淆了英国年轻穆斯林的合法政治抵抗与暴力极端主义的迹象,从而使人们相信,“预防”是一种社会工程的形式,最终通过重申国家内外政策的现状来平息抵抗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The scope and limits of combatting violent extremism in the United Kingdom
This article situates the debate on the United Kingdom’s Prevent policy in the broader framework of the global paradigm for countering violent extremism (CVE), which appeared at the end of 2015. It argues that omission of a nuanced focus on the social, cultural, economic, and political characteristics of radicalised people has led to a tendency to introduce blanket measures which, inadvertently and indirectly, have had harmful results. Moreover, although Prevent has been the fundamental element of the British government’s counterterrorist strategy since 2006, it confuses legitimate political resistance of young British Muslims with signs of violent extremism, thus giving credence to the argument that Prevent is a form of social engineering which, in the last instance, pacifies resistance by reaffirming the status quo in the country’s domestic and foreign policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista CIDOB d Afers Internationals
Revista CIDOB d Afers Internationals INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信