{"title":"流聚合与压缩滑动窗口","authors":"Prajith Ramakrishnan Geethakumari, I. Sourdis","doi":"10.1145/3590774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High performance stream aggregation is critical for many emerging applications that analyze massive volumes of data. Incoming data needs to be stored in a sliding window during processing, in case the aggregation functions cannot be computed incrementally. Updating the window with new incoming values and reading it to feed the aggregation functions are the two primary steps in stream aggregation. Although window updates can be supported efficiently using multi-level queues, frequent window aggregations remain a performance bottleneck as they put tremendous pressure on the memory bandwidth and capacity. This article addresses this problem by enhancing StreamZip, a dataflow stream aggregation engine that is able to compress the sliding windows. StreamZip deals with a number of data and control dependency challenges to integrate a compressor in the stream aggregation pipeline and alleviate the memory pressure posed by frequent aggregations. In addition, StreamZip incorporates a caching mechanism for dealing with skewed-key distributions in the incoming data stream. In doing so, StreamZip offers higher throughput as well as larger effective window capacity to support larger problems. StreamZip supports diverse compression algorithms offering both lossless and lossy compression to integers as well as floating-point numbers. Compared to designs without compression, StreamZip lossless and lossy designs achieve up to 7.5× and 22× higher throughput, while improving the effective memory capacity by up to 5× and 23×, respectively.","PeriodicalId":49248,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems","volume":"16 1","pages":"1 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stream Aggregation with Compressed Sliding Windows\",\"authors\":\"Prajith Ramakrishnan Geethakumari, I. Sourdis\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3590774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"High performance stream aggregation is critical for many emerging applications that analyze massive volumes of data. Incoming data needs to be stored in a sliding window during processing, in case the aggregation functions cannot be computed incrementally. Updating the window with new incoming values and reading it to feed the aggregation functions are the two primary steps in stream aggregation. Although window updates can be supported efficiently using multi-level queues, frequent window aggregations remain a performance bottleneck as they put tremendous pressure on the memory bandwidth and capacity. This article addresses this problem by enhancing StreamZip, a dataflow stream aggregation engine that is able to compress the sliding windows. StreamZip deals with a number of data and control dependency challenges to integrate a compressor in the stream aggregation pipeline and alleviate the memory pressure posed by frequent aggregations. In addition, StreamZip incorporates a caching mechanism for dealing with skewed-key distributions in the incoming data stream. In doing so, StreamZip offers higher throughput as well as larger effective window capacity to support larger problems. StreamZip supports diverse compression algorithms offering both lossless and lossy compression to integers as well as floating-point numbers. Compared to designs without compression, StreamZip lossless and lossy designs achieve up to 7.5× and 22× higher throughput, while improving the effective memory capacity by up to 5× and 23×, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3590774\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3590774","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stream Aggregation with Compressed Sliding Windows
High performance stream aggregation is critical for many emerging applications that analyze massive volumes of data. Incoming data needs to be stored in a sliding window during processing, in case the aggregation functions cannot be computed incrementally. Updating the window with new incoming values and reading it to feed the aggregation functions are the two primary steps in stream aggregation. Although window updates can be supported efficiently using multi-level queues, frequent window aggregations remain a performance bottleneck as they put tremendous pressure on the memory bandwidth and capacity. This article addresses this problem by enhancing StreamZip, a dataflow stream aggregation engine that is able to compress the sliding windows. StreamZip deals with a number of data and control dependency challenges to integrate a compressor in the stream aggregation pipeline and alleviate the memory pressure posed by frequent aggregations. In addition, StreamZip incorporates a caching mechanism for dealing with skewed-key distributions in the incoming data stream. In doing so, StreamZip offers higher throughput as well as larger effective window capacity to support larger problems. StreamZip supports diverse compression algorithms offering both lossless and lossy compression to integers as well as floating-point numbers. Compared to designs without compression, StreamZip lossless and lossy designs achieve up to 7.5× and 22× higher throughput, while improving the effective memory capacity by up to 5× and 23×, respectively.
期刊介绍:
TRETS is the top journal focusing on research in, on, and with reconfigurable systems and on their underlying technology. The scope, rationale, and coverage by other journals are often limited to particular aspects of reconfigurable technology or reconfigurable systems. TRETS is a journal that covers reconfigurability in its own right.
Topics that would be appropriate for TRETS would include all levels of reconfigurable system abstractions and all aspects of reconfigurable technology including platforms, programming environments and application successes that support these systems for computing or other applications.
-The board and systems architectures of a reconfigurable platform.
-Programming environments of reconfigurable systems, especially those designed for use with reconfigurable systems that will lead to increased programmer productivity.
-Languages and compilers for reconfigurable systems.
-Logic synthesis and related tools, as they relate to reconfigurable systems.
-Applications on which success can be demonstrated.
The underlying technology from which reconfigurable systems are developed. (Currently this technology is that of FPGAs, but research on the nature and use of follow-on technologies is appropriate for TRETS.)
In considering whether a paper is suitable for TRETS, the foremost question should be whether reconfigurability has been essential to success. Topics such as architecture, programming languages, compilers, and environments, logic synthesis, and high performance applications are all suitable if the context is appropriate. For example, an architecture for an embedded application that happens to use FPGAs is not necessarily suitable for TRETS, but an architecture using FPGAs for which the reconfigurability of the FPGAs is an inherent part of the specifications (perhaps due to a need for re-use on multiple applications) would be appropriate for TRETS.