{"title":"与恶魔交往?中世纪最后几个世纪的魔术师与契约问题","authors":"J. Véronèse","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.3740764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper intends to confront the theology of the magic pact with demons such as it is defined in the XIVth century by the inquisitor Nicholas Eymerich – one of the best advocates of the qualification of magic as heresy – with the way the contemporary texts of ritual magic defined for their part the relationship between the magician and the devils. Indeed, the magic books that Eymerich seems to know quite well give to see a much more complex reality that the manichean vision of the theologians between the demonic worship of the apostate magician and the divine worship of the christian believer. The magician who adresses the devils by words and signs is the initiator of a true pact with God, who is the only One who can delegate to him the potestas ligandi necessary to subdue the evil spirits. This pact is based on his faith and on his spiritual purity. But at the same time, and without systematic mind, he turns to practices, such as the sacrifices, which draw a more ambivalent relationship with the spirits and seem de facto to define a kind of secondary pact. Obviously, this type of practices could only feed the traditional negative vision of magic shared by the theologians and the inquisitors at the end of the Middle Ages.","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":"12 1","pages":"277-293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faire société avec les démons ? Le magicien et la question du pacte aux derniers siècles du Moyen Âge\",\"authors\":\"J. Véronèse\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.3740764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper intends to confront the theology of the magic pact with demons such as it is defined in the XIVth century by the inquisitor Nicholas Eymerich – one of the best advocates of the qualification of magic as heresy – with the way the contemporary texts of ritual magic defined for their part the relationship between the magician and the devils. Indeed, the magic books that Eymerich seems to know quite well give to see a much more complex reality that the manichean vision of the theologians between the demonic worship of the apostate magician and the divine worship of the christian believer. The magician who adresses the devils by words and signs is the initiator of a true pact with God, who is the only One who can delegate to him the potestas ligandi necessary to subdue the evil spirits. This pact is based on his faith and on his spiritual purity. But at the same time, and without systematic mind, he turns to practices, such as the sacrifices, which draw a more ambivalent relationship with the spirits and seem de facto to define a kind of secondary pact. Obviously, this type of practices could only feed the traditional negative vision of magic shared by the theologians and the inquisitors at the end of the Middle Ages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Readings\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"277-293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Readings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3740764\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Readings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3740764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Faire société avec les démons ? Le magicien et la question du pacte aux derniers siècles du Moyen Âge
This paper intends to confront the theology of the magic pact with demons such as it is defined in the XIVth century by the inquisitor Nicholas Eymerich – one of the best advocates of the qualification of magic as heresy – with the way the contemporary texts of ritual magic defined for their part the relationship between the magician and the devils. Indeed, the magic books that Eymerich seems to know quite well give to see a much more complex reality that the manichean vision of the theologians between the demonic worship of the apostate magician and the divine worship of the christian believer. The magician who adresses the devils by words and signs is the initiator of a true pact with God, who is the only One who can delegate to him the potestas ligandi necessary to subdue the evil spirits. This pact is based on his faith and on his spiritual purity. But at the same time, and without systematic mind, he turns to practices, such as the sacrifices, which draw a more ambivalent relationship with the spirits and seem de facto to define a kind of secondary pact. Obviously, this type of practices could only feed the traditional negative vision of magic shared by the theologians and the inquisitors at the end of the Middle Ages.
期刊介绍:
Philosophical Readings, a four-monthly journal, ISSN 2036-4989, features articles, discussions, translations, reviews, and bibliographical information on all philosophical disciplines. Philosophical Readings is a Open Access journal devoted to the promotion of competent and definitive contributions to philosophical knowledge. Not associated with any school or group, not the organ of any association or institution, it is interested in persistent and resolute inquiries into root questions, regardless of the writer’s affiliation. The journal welcomes also works that fall into various disciplines: religion, history, literature, law, political science, computer scnfoience, economics, and empirical sciences that deal with philosophical problems. Philosophical Readings uses a policy of blind review by at least two consultants to evaluate articles accepted for serious consideration. Philosophical Readings promotes special issues on particular topics of special relevance in the philosophical debates. Philosophical Readings occasionally has opportunities for Guest Editors for special issues of the journal. Anyone who has an idea for a special issue and would like that idea to be considered, should contact the Executive editor. Philosophical Readings publishes at least 9 original researches in a calendar year.