{"title":"《国民性大探究","authors":"Daniel Pipes","doi":"10.51845/35.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the tail end of humanity’s greatest wars, mid-twentieth-century psychologists, sociologists, anthropologists, political scientists, and others set about discovering “national character,” the grand search for cultural mores that might explain the behavior of nation states. These efforts ran aground, writes historian Daniel Pipes, as social scientists ignored the most important catalyst for the actions of nation-states: history.","PeriodicalId":35247,"journal":{"name":"Academic Questions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Great Inquiry into National Character\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Pipes\",\"doi\":\"10.51845/35.1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the tail end of humanity’s greatest wars, mid-twentieth-century psychologists, sociologists, anthropologists, political scientists, and others set about discovering “national character,” the grand search for cultural mores that might explain the behavior of nation states. These efforts ran aground, writes historian Daniel Pipes, as social scientists ignored the most important catalyst for the actions of nation-states: history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Questions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Questions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51845/35.1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Questions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51845/35.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
At the tail end of humanity’s greatest wars, mid-twentieth-century psychologists, sociologists, anthropologists, political scientists, and others set about discovering “national character,” the grand search for cultural mores that might explain the behavior of nation states. These efforts ran aground, writes historian Daniel Pipes, as social scientists ignored the most important catalyst for the actions of nation-states: history.