呼吁进行政策相关研究

IF 2 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS
Andrew B. Jackson
{"title":"呼吁进行政策相关研究","authors":"Andrew B. Jackson","doi":"10.1177/03128962221106033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of evidence-based research in informing practice is of vital importance. Academic researchers are in a unique position to contribute to this, having the mix of skill sets, objectivity, and time to consider the issues at hand. Indeed, regulators such as the Australian Accounting Standards Board continually welcome evidence-based research to help inform the development of accounting standards, and to assist in post-implementation reviews. Academics, however, do not always see the benefits of engaging in such policy relevant activities. The current incentive structure around publishing is such that chasing top-tier publications is key, even if it is of little practical relevance to society. It is also noteworthy that while research published in top-tier journals often address important phenomena, because of their global audience, they often leave little room for local context or issues of domestic importance. The bias against publishing no-results studies is also a detractor for researchers to begin a project with a high risk of finding no results and limiting publication potential. Insignificant results, however, from a policy perspective is of great importance in drafting policy. This debate is not new and keeps being rediscussed. Instead of re-analysing the same issues over and over as others have done (Hambrick, 1994; Tourish, 2020), the Australian Journal of Management has chosen to instil positive change. Within universities, especially in Australia, the role academics play in society is shifting. There are constant messages to demonstrate how we are able to engage with industry, and the government has a high priority around the commercialisation and, perhaps more fitting for business and management academics, the translation and societal impact of research. To this extent, how research is able to inform policy debates will become highly regarded. At the Australian Journal of Management, we recognise the importance of research that engages with industry and policy, and is able to inform practice. We are also aware of the bias against publishing no-result studies, but the importance of such to policy makers. Accordingly, we are introducing a new stream of submissions around policy issues that follows a pre-registered model. The model for policy-based research will involve an initial submission that highlights the policy-related research question, the importance of the question, and the method upon which data will be collected and analysed. It is key to note that no data are to have been collected at this point.","PeriodicalId":47209,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Management","volume":"47 1","pages":"399 - 400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Call for Policy Relevant Research\",\"authors\":\"Andrew B. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03128962221106033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The importance of evidence-based research in informing practice is of vital importance. Academic researchers are in a unique position to contribute to this, having the mix of skill sets, objectivity, and time to consider the issues at hand. Indeed, regulators such as the Australian Accounting Standards Board continually welcome evidence-based research to help inform the development of accounting standards, and to assist in post-implementation reviews. Academics, however, do not always see the benefits of engaging in such policy relevant activities. The current incentive structure around publishing is such that chasing top-tier publications is key, even if it is of little practical relevance to society. It is also noteworthy that while research published in top-tier journals often address important phenomena, because of their global audience, they often leave little room for local context or issues of domestic importance. The bias against publishing no-results studies is also a detractor for researchers to begin a project with a high risk of finding no results and limiting publication potential. Insignificant results, however, from a policy perspective is of great importance in drafting policy. This debate is not new and keeps being rediscussed. Instead of re-analysing the same issues over and over as others have done (Hambrick, 1994; Tourish, 2020), the Australian Journal of Management has chosen to instil positive change. Within universities, especially in Australia, the role academics play in society is shifting. There are constant messages to demonstrate how we are able to engage with industry, and the government has a high priority around the commercialisation and, perhaps more fitting for business and management academics, the translation and societal impact of research. To this extent, how research is able to inform policy debates will become highly regarded. At the Australian Journal of Management, we recognise the importance of research that engages with industry and policy, and is able to inform practice. We are also aware of the bias against publishing no-result studies, but the importance of such to policy makers. Accordingly, we are introducing a new stream of submissions around policy issues that follows a pre-registered model. The model for policy-based research will involve an initial submission that highlights the policy-related research question, the importance of the question, and the method upon which data will be collected and analysed. It is key to note that no data are to have been collected at this point.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"399 - 400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962221106033\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962221106033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

循证研究在告知实践中的重要性至关重要。学术研究人员在这方面处于独特的地位,他们拥有技能、客观性和时间来考虑手头的问题。事实上,澳大利亚会计准则委员会等监管机构不断欢迎循证研究,以帮助为会计准则的制定提供信息,并协助实施后的审查。然而,学术界并不总是看到从事此类政策相关活动的好处。目前围绕出版业的激励结构是这样的,追逐顶级出版物是关键,即使它对社会几乎没有实际意义。同样值得注意的是,尽管发表在顶级期刊上的研究往往涉及重要现象,但由于其受众遍布全球,它们往往很少为当地背景或国内重要问题留出空间。对发表无结果研究的偏见也是研究人员在开始一个项目时发现无结果和限制发表潜力的高风险的一个不利因素。然而,从政策角度来看,微不足道的结果在起草政策时具有重要意义。这场辩论并不是什么新鲜事,而且不断被重新讨论。《澳大利亚管理杂志》没有像其他人那样一遍又一遍地重新分析同样的问题(Hambrick,1994;Tourish,2020),而是选择灌输积极的变革。在大学内部,尤其是在澳大利亚,学术界在社会中扮演的角色正在发生变化。不断有信息表明我们能够与行业合作,政府高度重视商业化,也许更适合商业和管理学者,研究的翻译和社会影响。在这种程度上,研究如何能够为政策辩论提供信息将受到高度重视。在《澳大利亚管理杂志》上,我们认识到与行业和政策相关的研究的重要性,并能够为实践提供信息。我们也意识到对发表无结果研究的偏见,但这对政策制定者来说很重要。因此,我们正在引入一系列新的关于政策问题的意见书,遵循预先注册的模式。基于政策的研究模式将包括一份初步提交文件,其中强调与政策相关的研究问题、问题的重要性以及收集和分析数据的方法。需要注意的是,目前还没有收集到任何数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Call for Policy Relevant Research
The importance of evidence-based research in informing practice is of vital importance. Academic researchers are in a unique position to contribute to this, having the mix of skill sets, objectivity, and time to consider the issues at hand. Indeed, regulators such as the Australian Accounting Standards Board continually welcome evidence-based research to help inform the development of accounting standards, and to assist in post-implementation reviews. Academics, however, do not always see the benefits of engaging in such policy relevant activities. The current incentive structure around publishing is such that chasing top-tier publications is key, even if it is of little practical relevance to society. It is also noteworthy that while research published in top-tier journals often address important phenomena, because of their global audience, they often leave little room for local context or issues of domestic importance. The bias against publishing no-results studies is also a detractor for researchers to begin a project with a high risk of finding no results and limiting publication potential. Insignificant results, however, from a policy perspective is of great importance in drafting policy. This debate is not new and keeps being rediscussed. Instead of re-analysing the same issues over and over as others have done (Hambrick, 1994; Tourish, 2020), the Australian Journal of Management has chosen to instil positive change. Within universities, especially in Australia, the role academics play in society is shifting. There are constant messages to demonstrate how we are able to engage with industry, and the government has a high priority around the commercialisation and, perhaps more fitting for business and management academics, the translation and societal impact of research. To this extent, how research is able to inform policy debates will become highly regarded. At the Australian Journal of Management, we recognise the importance of research that engages with industry and policy, and is able to inform practice. We are also aware of the bias against publishing no-result studies, but the importance of such to policy makers. Accordingly, we are introducing a new stream of submissions around policy issues that follows a pre-registered model. The model for policy-based research will involve an initial submission that highlights the policy-related research question, the importance of the question, and the method upon which data will be collected and analysed. It is key to note that no data are to have been collected at this point.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The objectives of the Australian Journal of Management are to encourage and publish research in the field of management. The terms management and research are both broadly defined. The former includes the management of firms, groups, industries, regulatory bodies, government, and other institutions. The latter encompasses both discipline- and problem-based research. Consistent with the policy, the Australian Journal of Management publishes research in accounting, applied economics, finance, industrial relations, political science, psychology, statistics, and other disciplines, provided the application is to management, as well as research in areas such as marketing, corporate strategy, operations management, organisation development, decision analysis, and other problem-focuses paradigms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信