批判荣格的伦理学

Q4 Psychology
J. Mills
{"title":"批判荣格的伦理学","authors":"J. Mills","doi":"10.1080/19409052.2018.1446502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTC. G. Jung never offered a formalized system of ethics, but his analytical psychology is teeming with ethical pronouncements. Jung’s ethical theories are introduced and explored in relation to a book written by Dan Merkur centering on the question of morality in human nature, the individuation process, and in psychotherapeutic treatment. Jung struggled to provide a dialectical account of human valuation, yet this is implied in the very process of overcoming oppositions through the negotiation and integration of differences, and in holding balances between internal and external conflicts. The psychologicalization of ethics, particularly the compensatory function of the unconscious, ensures that moral psychology is fraught with ambivalence, uncertainty, and competing dilemmas that are unique to each person, hence no formal or rational system of deontological ethics is possible.","PeriodicalId":38977,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Jungian Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"135-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19409052.2018.1446502","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critiquing Jung’s Ethics\",\"authors\":\"J. Mills\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19409052.2018.1446502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTC. G. Jung never offered a formalized system of ethics, but his analytical psychology is teeming with ethical pronouncements. Jung’s ethical theories are introduced and explored in relation to a book written by Dan Merkur centering on the question of morality in human nature, the individuation process, and in psychotherapeutic treatment. Jung struggled to provide a dialectical account of human valuation, yet this is implied in the very process of overcoming oppositions through the negotiation and integration of differences, and in holding balances between internal and external conflicts. The psychologicalization of ethics, particularly the compensatory function of the unconscious, ensures that moral psychology is fraught with ambivalence, uncertainty, and competing dilemmas that are unique to each person, hence no formal or rational system of deontological ethics is possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Jungian Studies\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"135-142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19409052.2018.1446502\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Jungian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19409052.2018.1446502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Jungian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19409052.2018.1446502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ABSTRACTC。荣格从未提出一个正式的伦理学体系,但他的分析心理学充满了伦理宣言。荣格的伦理理论是在Dan Merkur写的一本书中介绍和探讨的,这本书的核心是人性中的道德问题,个体化过程,以及心理治疗。荣格努力提供人类价值的辩证解释,然而这隐含在通过协商和整合差异来克服对立的过程中,以及在内部和外部冲突之间保持平衡的过程中。伦理的心理化,特别是无意识的补偿功能,确保了道德心理学充满了矛盾心理、不确定性和竞争困境,这些都是每个人独有的,因此没有正式或合理的义务论伦理体系是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critiquing Jung’s Ethics
ABSTRACTC. G. Jung never offered a formalized system of ethics, but his analytical psychology is teeming with ethical pronouncements. Jung’s ethical theories are introduced and explored in relation to a book written by Dan Merkur centering on the question of morality in human nature, the individuation process, and in psychotherapeutic treatment. Jung struggled to provide a dialectical account of human valuation, yet this is implied in the very process of overcoming oppositions through the negotiation and integration of differences, and in holding balances between internal and external conflicts. The psychologicalization of ethics, particularly the compensatory function of the unconscious, ensures that moral psychology is fraught with ambivalence, uncertainty, and competing dilemmas that are unique to each person, hence no formal or rational system of deontological ethics is possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Jungian Studies
International Journal of Jungian Studies Psychology-Applied Psychology
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信