社会援助政策中的领土类别:关于领土不平等和获得公共产品和服务的说明

Daniely Silva de Viveiros, Gustavo Silva, Diana Jenifer Ribeiro de Almeida
{"title":"社会援助政策中的领土类别:关于领土不平等和获得公共产品和服务的说明","authors":"Daniely Silva de Viveiros, Gustavo Silva, Diana Jenifer Ribeiro de Almeida","doi":"10.5433/1679-4842.2020V23N1P236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a critical analysis of the National Social Assistance Policy (PNAS), seeking an approximation of the categories of territory and access, both in its normative basis and in the planning and management practice of this policy. This paper aims to qualify two main aspects: the definition of social rights and access to public goods and services in the Brazilian context and as an emerging territory category as a guiding element of social assistance policy. From this model, we draw or deal with discussions and objective questions to be used: how are they constituted as notions of access to social rights and territory in PNAS? The implementation of the social assistance policy, after PNAS approval, in 2004, may or may not contribute to overcoming the forms of prohibition against the use of urban spoliation processes and socio-territorial inequalities, since there is no universalization of care and rights?","PeriodicalId":31083,"journal":{"name":"Servico Social em Revista","volume":"23 1","pages":"236-255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A categoria território na política de assistência social: notas sobre desigualdade territorial e o acesso aos bens e serviços públicos\",\"authors\":\"Daniely Silva de Viveiros, Gustavo Silva, Diana Jenifer Ribeiro de Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.5433/1679-4842.2020V23N1P236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a critical analysis of the National Social Assistance Policy (PNAS), seeking an approximation of the categories of territory and access, both in its normative basis and in the planning and management practice of this policy. This paper aims to qualify two main aspects: the definition of social rights and access to public goods and services in the Brazilian context and as an emerging territory category as a guiding element of social assistance policy. From this model, we draw or deal with discussions and objective questions to be used: how are they constituted as notions of access to social rights and territory in PNAS? The implementation of the social assistance policy, after PNAS approval, in 2004, may or may not contribute to overcoming the forms of prohibition against the use of urban spoliation processes and socio-territorial inequalities, since there is no universalization of care and rights?\",\"PeriodicalId\":31083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Servico Social em Revista\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"236-255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Servico Social em Revista\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-4842.2020V23N1P236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Servico Social em Revista","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-4842.2020V23N1P236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对国家社会援助政策(PNAS)进行了批判性分析,在其规范基础以及该政策的规划和管理实践中,寻求近似的领土和准入类别。本文旨在限定两个主要方面:社会权利的定义和在巴西背景下获得公共产品和服务的机会,以及作为社会援助政策的指导因素的新兴领土类别。从这个模型中,我们得出或处理将要使用的讨论和客观问题:它们如何构成PNAS中获得社会权利和领土的概念?在2004年PNAS批准后,社会援助政策的实施可能会或可能不会有助于克服禁止使用城市掠夺过程和社会-领土不平等的形式,因为没有普遍的照顾和权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A categoria território na política de assistência social: notas sobre desigualdade territorial e o acesso aos bens e serviços públicos
This paper presents a critical analysis of the National Social Assistance Policy (PNAS), seeking an approximation of the categories of territory and access, both in its normative basis and in the planning and management practice of this policy. This paper aims to qualify two main aspects: the definition of social rights and access to public goods and services in the Brazilian context and as an emerging territory category as a guiding element of social assistance policy. From this model, we draw or deal with discussions and objective questions to be used: how are they constituted as notions of access to social rights and territory in PNAS? The implementation of the social assistance policy, after PNAS approval, in 2004, may or may not contribute to overcoming the forms of prohibition against the use of urban spoliation processes and socio-territorial inequalities, since there is no universalization of care and rights?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信