从师资角度看基于Servqual模型的甲类医科大学教育服务质量

M. Yousefi, Z. Jahantab, Majid Khadem-Rezaiyan
{"title":"从师资角度看基于Servqual模型的甲类医科大学教育服务质量","authors":"M. Yousefi, Z. Jahantab, Majid Khadem-Rezaiyan","doi":"10.52547/dsme.8.3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : Most studies that examine the difference between expectation and perceptions in educational systems evaluate this gap from the perspective of service recipients. However, the opinion of service providers (faculty members) should not be ignored because it can be provide the opportunity to design reformations in order to increase educational service quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the educational service quality from the perspective of faculty memebers of Mashhad Unievrsit of Medical Sciences in 2018. Methods : This cross-sectional study was performed on 178 faculty members at different levels using a questionnaire to evaluate the quality of educational services based on the SERVQUAL model. The validity and reliability of this questionnaire has been proven in previous studies. Participants were selected by available sampling method and experessed their opinions in five dimensions of service quality, including confidence, assurance, accountability, empathy and physical in the two areas of present and desired status (Likert scale 1 to 4 ). SPSS version 26 was used for statistical analysis. Results : From the perspective of faculty members, there was a statistically significant difference between the present and the desired status in all five dimensions. Overall, the highest gap was in the accountability dimension (-0.59±0.50) and the lowest gap was in the confidence dimension (-0.21±0.56). The lowest reported gap was reported by associate professors (-0.25±0.29) and the highest gap was reported by professors (-0.52±0.39). Conclusion : From the faculty members' point of view, the quality of educational services is lower than expected, although this negative gap is not large. To make up for this small gap, it is advisable to review the statements made by faculty members in this report. This study can lead to the development of strategies to improve the quality of university education.","PeriodicalId":32175,"journal":{"name":"Development Strategies in Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Of Educational Services in A Type One Medical Sciences University Based On Servqual Model From The Perspective of Faculty Members\",\"authors\":\"M. Yousefi, Z. Jahantab, Majid Khadem-Rezaiyan\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/dsme.8.3.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction : Most studies that examine the difference between expectation and perceptions in educational systems evaluate this gap from the perspective of service recipients. However, the opinion of service providers (faculty members) should not be ignored because it can be provide the opportunity to design reformations in order to increase educational service quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the educational service quality from the perspective of faculty memebers of Mashhad Unievrsit of Medical Sciences in 2018. Methods : This cross-sectional study was performed on 178 faculty members at different levels using a questionnaire to evaluate the quality of educational services based on the SERVQUAL model. The validity and reliability of this questionnaire has been proven in previous studies. Participants were selected by available sampling method and experessed their opinions in five dimensions of service quality, including confidence, assurance, accountability, empathy and physical in the two areas of present and desired status (Likert scale 1 to 4 ). SPSS version 26 was used for statistical analysis. Results : From the perspective of faculty members, there was a statistically significant difference between the present and the desired status in all five dimensions. Overall, the highest gap was in the accountability dimension (-0.59±0.50) and the lowest gap was in the confidence dimension (-0.21±0.56). The lowest reported gap was reported by associate professors (-0.25±0.29) and the highest gap was reported by professors (-0.52±0.39). Conclusion : From the faculty members' point of view, the quality of educational services is lower than expected, although this negative gap is not large. To make up for this small gap, it is advisable to review the statements made by faculty members in this report. This study can lead to the development of strategies to improve the quality of university education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development Strategies in Medical Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development Strategies in Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/dsme.8.3.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Strategies in Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/dsme.8.3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

引言:大多数研究教育系统中期望和感知之间的差异的研究都是从服务接受者的角度来评估这一差距的。然而,服务提供者(教员)的意见不应被忽视,因为它可以提供设计改革的机会,以提高教育服务质量。本研究的目的是从2018年马什哈德医学科学大学教员的角度评估教育服务质量。方法:采用SERVQUAL模型,采用问卷调查法对178名不同层次的教职工进行教育服务质量评价。该问卷的有效性和可靠性已在以往的研究中得到证实。参与者通过可用的抽样方法进行选择,并在服务质量的五个维度上表达他们的意见,包括信心、保证、责任感、同理心和身体状况(Likert量表1-4)。采用SPSS 26进行统计分析。结果:从教师的角度来看,在所有五个维度上,当前状态和期望状态之间存在统计学上的显著差异。总体而言,责任维度的差距最大(-0.59±0.50),信心维度的差距最小(-0.21±0.56)。报告的差距最小的是副教授(-0.25±0.29),报告的差距最大的是教授(-0.52±0.39)。结论:从教职工的角度来看,教育服务质量低于预期,尽管这个负间隙不大。为了弥补这一小差距,建议复习一下教员在本报告中的陈述。这项研究有助于制定提高大学教育质量的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality Of Educational Services in A Type One Medical Sciences University Based On Servqual Model From The Perspective of Faculty Members
Introduction : Most studies that examine the difference between expectation and perceptions in educational systems evaluate this gap from the perspective of service recipients. However, the opinion of service providers (faculty members) should not be ignored because it can be provide the opportunity to design reformations in order to increase educational service quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the educational service quality from the perspective of faculty memebers of Mashhad Unievrsit of Medical Sciences in 2018. Methods : This cross-sectional study was performed on 178 faculty members at different levels using a questionnaire to evaluate the quality of educational services based on the SERVQUAL model. The validity and reliability of this questionnaire has been proven in previous studies. Participants were selected by available sampling method and experessed their opinions in five dimensions of service quality, including confidence, assurance, accountability, empathy and physical in the two areas of present and desired status (Likert scale 1 to 4 ). SPSS version 26 was used for statistical analysis. Results : From the perspective of faculty members, there was a statistically significant difference between the present and the desired status in all five dimensions. Overall, the highest gap was in the accountability dimension (-0.59±0.50) and the lowest gap was in the confidence dimension (-0.21±0.56). The lowest reported gap was reported by associate professors (-0.25±0.29) and the highest gap was reported by professors (-0.52±0.39). Conclusion : From the faculty members' point of view, the quality of educational services is lower than expected, although this negative gap is not large. To make up for this small gap, it is advisable to review the statements made by faculty members in this report. This study can lead to the development of strategies to improve the quality of university education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信