利益的交付或可取性?预测利己主义和利他主义信息呼吁对再生水使用的有效性

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Ben Posetti, A. Hurlimann, Aaron Tkaczynski, Melanie Randle, S. Dolnicar
{"title":"利益的交付或可取性?预测利己主义和利他主义信息呼吁对再生水使用的有效性","authors":"Ben Posetti, A. Hurlimann, Aaron Tkaczynski, Melanie Randle, S. Dolnicar","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2022.2028686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A large proportion of the global population is currently grappling with water shortages. In many countries, the potential implementation of recycled water initiatives has been thwarted because of public opposition towards the notion of using recycled water. The development of effective advertising messages that increase public acceptance and willingness to use alternative water sources would increase the likelihood of recycled water use being embraced by communities. The present study conducted a factorial design experiment to test the effectiveness of 18 different print advertising messages in the context of recycled water use. Both egoistic and altruistic benefits are equally effective in increasing behavioural intention. Communicating the delivery rather than the desirability of benefits is more likely to increase community acceptance of recycled water. Print media represents a cost-effective marketing channel and has the potential to facilitate greater public support for recycled water initiatives.","PeriodicalId":46081,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"29 1","pages":"200 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delivery or desirability of benefits? Predicting the effectiveness of egoistic and altruistic message appeals for recycled water use\",\"authors\":\"Ben Posetti, A. Hurlimann, Aaron Tkaczynski, Melanie Randle, S. Dolnicar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14486563.2022.2028686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT A large proportion of the global population is currently grappling with water shortages. In many countries, the potential implementation of recycled water initiatives has been thwarted because of public opposition towards the notion of using recycled water. The development of effective advertising messages that increase public acceptance and willingness to use alternative water sources would increase the likelihood of recycled water use being embraced by communities. The present study conducted a factorial design experiment to test the effectiveness of 18 different print advertising messages in the context of recycled water use. Both egoistic and altruistic benefits are equally effective in increasing behavioural intention. Communicating the delivery rather than the desirability of benefits is more likely to increase community acceptance of recycled water. Print media represents a cost-effective marketing channel and has the potential to facilitate greater public support for recycled water initiatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"200 - 217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2022.2028686\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2022.2028686","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:目前,全球很大一部分人口正在努力解决水资源短缺问题。在许多国家,由于公众反对使用再生水的概念,再生水倡议的潜在实施受到阻碍。制定有效的广告信息,提高公众对使用替代水源的接受度和意愿,将增加社区接受循环水使用的可能性。本研究进行了一项析因设计实验,以测试18种不同印刷广告信息在循环水使用背景下的有效性。利己主义和利他主义的好处在增加行为意图方面同样有效。沟通交付而不是利益的可取性更有可能提高社区对再生水的接受度。印刷媒体是一种具有成本效益的营销渠道,有可能促进公众对再生水倡议的更多支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Delivery or desirability of benefits? Predicting the effectiveness of egoistic and altruistic message appeals for recycled water use
ABSTRACT A large proportion of the global population is currently grappling with water shortages. In many countries, the potential implementation of recycled water initiatives has been thwarted because of public opposition towards the notion of using recycled water. The development of effective advertising messages that increase public acceptance and willingness to use alternative water sources would increase the likelihood of recycled water use being embraced by communities. The present study conducted a factorial design experiment to test the effectiveness of 18 different print advertising messages in the context of recycled water use. Both egoistic and altruistic benefits are equally effective in increasing behavioural intention. Communicating the delivery rather than the desirability of benefits is more likely to increase community acceptance of recycled water. Print media represents a cost-effective marketing channel and has the potential to facilitate greater public support for recycled water initiatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信