{"title":"自回归尾指数模型在中国股市中的应用","authors":"Jingyu Ji, Deyuan Li","doi":"10.1080/24754269.2020.1862586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We congratulate Professor Zhengjun Zhang for a topnotch contribution to the literature and thank the editor for the invitation to participate in the discussion of the excellent review paper. Zhang (2020) provides an informative summary ofmodelling systematic risk with nonlinear time series models and tail dependence measures based on extreme observations. In the current era, where risk management is becoming more and more important, this review paper is timely and will provide the impetus for future research in this and broader areas. Section 5.1 in Zhang (2020) proposes the autoregressive tail-index model to characterise and describe systematic risk and risk contagions. The autoregressive tail-index model is not only a good measure of systematic risk in the US stock market (Zhao et al., 2018), but can also be applied to the study of extreme climate (Deng et al., 2020) and other fields. In this discussion, we are more interested in whether the autoregressive tail-index model is also suitable to characterise the systematic risk in China’s stock market. We present an analysis of the stock negative log-returns of the Shanghai Composite Index (SSE Index), which is one of the most important indexes for China’s stock market. The data contains the daily closing prices of 180 components of SSE Index and is downloaded from WindFinancial Terminal from 01/05/2005 to 10/20/2020 with 3836 observations for each stock. Figure 1 plots the daily closing prices of SSE Index. Since SSE Index adjusts its component stocks every half year, we analyse 87 stocks that have always been included in the index from 01/05/2005 to 10/20/2020. For day t, we obtain 87 negative log-returns and calculate the maximaQ t = max1≤i≤87 ri,t , where ri,t is the daily negative log-return for stock i. Figure 2 shows the histogram of {Q t : t = 1, 2, . . . , 3836}. By Figure 2, we see that there are many daily maxima of negative log-returns clustered around 0.11, due to the Limit Up-Limit Down Rule of China’s stock market. This rule prohibits trading activity in exchangelisted securities at prices outside specified price bands. Motivated by Section 5.1 in Zhang (2020), we first fit a GARCH(1,1) model with normal distributed innovations to each individual negative log-retuens series. Using the negative log-returns series divided by the fitted volatilities, we obtain standardised negative log-returns series for each stock. Taking the maximum value of the 87 standardised negative log-returns each day, we obtain a time series {Qt : t = 1, 2, . . . , 3836}, see Figure 3. It is seen that there exist four possible peaks around June 2006, November 2008, January 2016 and September 2018. In fact, China’s stockmarket experienced substantial boom and burst during these five periods. On June 7, 2006, SSE Index plummeted 88.45 points. In 2008, the US subprime mortgage crisis spread to the world and triggered a financial tsunami. SSE Index dropped from the highest of 6124 in October 2007 to the lowest of 1664 in October 2008. By the end of 2015, SSE Index was up 12.6% rebounding to 3600. In January 2016, China’s stock market experienced a steep sell-off and trading was halted on January 7, 2016 after themarket fell 7%.On January 26, 2016, SSE Index fell below the lowest point in August 2015, and on January 27, it fell down to 2638. After SSE Index fell below the 2016 lowest point 2638 on October 11, 2018, it slid below 2500 on October 18, and fell to 2449 on October 19, which plunged more than half from the 2015 highest point. The performance of {Qt} series is consistent with the empirical observations related to China’s stock market. Figure 4 presents the histogram of {Qt} series, which indicates that the standardised negative log-returns possibly follow Fréchet distribution. We fit {Qt} by the autoregressive tail-index model, i.e. model (5.1)-(5.3) in Zhang (2020). The fitted parameter values and standard deviations are presented in Table 1. It is shown that all parameters are significant, which indicates model (5.1)–(5.3) is suitable for the cross-sectional maxima of 87 stocks in SSE Index. The recovered tail indexes {α̂t} are presented in Figure 5. Obviously, when the extreme events appear, the tail index tends to decrease, reflecting an increase","PeriodicalId":22070,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Theory and Related Fields","volume":"5 1","pages":"31 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24754269.2020.1862586","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of autoregressive tail-index model to China's stock market\",\"authors\":\"Jingyu Ji, Deyuan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24754269.2020.1862586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We congratulate Professor Zhengjun Zhang for a topnotch contribution to the literature and thank the editor for the invitation to participate in the discussion of the excellent review paper. Zhang (2020) provides an informative summary ofmodelling systematic risk with nonlinear time series models and tail dependence measures based on extreme observations. In the current era, where risk management is becoming more and more important, this review paper is timely and will provide the impetus for future research in this and broader areas. Section 5.1 in Zhang (2020) proposes the autoregressive tail-index model to characterise and describe systematic risk and risk contagions. The autoregressive tail-index model is not only a good measure of systematic risk in the US stock market (Zhao et al., 2018), but can also be applied to the study of extreme climate (Deng et al., 2020) and other fields. In this discussion, we are more interested in whether the autoregressive tail-index model is also suitable to characterise the systematic risk in China’s stock market. We present an analysis of the stock negative log-returns of the Shanghai Composite Index (SSE Index), which is one of the most important indexes for China’s stock market. The data contains the daily closing prices of 180 components of SSE Index and is downloaded from WindFinancial Terminal from 01/05/2005 to 10/20/2020 with 3836 observations for each stock. Figure 1 plots the daily closing prices of SSE Index. Since SSE Index adjusts its component stocks every half year, we analyse 87 stocks that have always been included in the index from 01/05/2005 to 10/20/2020. For day t, we obtain 87 negative log-returns and calculate the maximaQ t = max1≤i≤87 ri,t , where ri,t is the daily negative log-return for stock i. Figure 2 shows the histogram of {Q t : t = 1, 2, . . . , 3836}. By Figure 2, we see that there are many daily maxima of negative log-returns clustered around 0.11, due to the Limit Up-Limit Down Rule of China’s stock market. This rule prohibits trading activity in exchangelisted securities at prices outside specified price bands. Motivated by Section 5.1 in Zhang (2020), we first fit a GARCH(1,1) model with normal distributed innovations to each individual negative log-retuens series. Using the negative log-returns series divided by the fitted volatilities, we obtain standardised negative log-returns series for each stock. Taking the maximum value of the 87 standardised negative log-returns each day, we obtain a time series {Qt : t = 1, 2, . . . , 3836}, see Figure 3. It is seen that there exist four possible peaks around June 2006, November 2008, January 2016 and September 2018. In fact, China’s stockmarket experienced substantial boom and burst during these five periods. On June 7, 2006, SSE Index plummeted 88.45 points. In 2008, the US subprime mortgage crisis spread to the world and triggered a financial tsunami. SSE Index dropped from the highest of 6124 in October 2007 to the lowest of 1664 in October 2008. By the end of 2015, SSE Index was up 12.6% rebounding to 3600. In January 2016, China’s stock market experienced a steep sell-off and trading was halted on January 7, 2016 after themarket fell 7%.On January 26, 2016, SSE Index fell below the lowest point in August 2015, and on January 27, it fell down to 2638. After SSE Index fell below the 2016 lowest point 2638 on October 11, 2018, it slid below 2500 on October 18, and fell to 2449 on October 19, which plunged more than half from the 2015 highest point. The performance of {Qt} series is consistent with the empirical observations related to China’s stock market. Figure 4 presents the histogram of {Qt} series, which indicates that the standardised negative log-returns possibly follow Fréchet distribution. We fit {Qt} by the autoregressive tail-index model, i.e. model (5.1)-(5.3) in Zhang (2020). The fitted parameter values and standard deviations are presented in Table 1. It is shown that all parameters are significant, which indicates model (5.1)–(5.3) is suitable for the cross-sectional maxima of 87 stocks in SSE Index. The recovered tail indexes {α̂t} are presented in Figure 5. Obviously, when the extreme events appear, the tail index tends to decrease, reflecting an increase\",\"PeriodicalId\":22070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical Theory and Related Fields\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"31 - 34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24754269.2020.1862586\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical Theory and Related Fields\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24754269.2020.1862586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Theory and Related Fields","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24754269.2020.1862586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
我们祝贺张正军教授对文献的卓越贡献,并感谢编辑邀请我们参与这篇优秀评论论文的讨论。张(2020)提供了一个关于用非线性时间序列模型和基于极端观测的尾部依赖性度量来建模系统风险的信息摘要。在当前风险管理变得越来越重要的时代,这篇综述论文是及时的,将为未来在这一领域和更广泛领域的研究提供动力。张(2020)第5.1节提出了自回归尾部指数模型来表征和描述系统风险和风险传染。自回归尾指数模型不仅是衡量美国股市系统风险的一个很好的指标(赵et al.,2018),还可以应用于极端气候的研究(Deng et al.,2020)等领域。在这场讨论中,我们更感兴趣的是自回归尾部指数模型是否也适用于描述中国股市的系统性风险。本文对中国股市最重要的指数之一上证指数的股票负对数收益率进行了分析。该数据包含上证指数180个组成部分的每日收盘价,从WindFinancial终端下载,时间为2005年5月1日至2020年10月20日,每只股票有3836个观察结果。图1描绘了上证指数的每日收盘价格。由于上证指数每半年调整一次成分股,我们分析了从2005年5月1日到2020年10月20日一直被纳入该指数的87只股票。对于第t天,我们获得87个负对数回报,并计算最大Q t=max1≤i≤87 ri,t,其中ri,t是股票i的每日负对数回报。图2显示了{Q t:t=1,2,…,3836}的直方图。通过图2,我们可以看到,由于中国股市的涨停-跌停规则,负对数回报率的日最大值聚集在0.11附近。该规则禁止以特定价格区间以外的价格进行交易所上市证券的交易活动。受张(2020)第5.1节的启发,我们首先将具有正态分布创新的GARCH(1,1)模型拟合到每个负对数回归序列。使用负对数收益率序列除以拟合的波动率,我们获得了每只股票的标准化负对数收益序列。取每天87个标准化负对数回报的最大值,我们得到了一个时间序列{Qt:t=1,2,…,3836},见图3。可以看出,在2006年6月、2008年11月、2016年1月和2018年9月前后存在四个可能的峰值。事实上,中国股市在这五个时期经历了巨大的繁荣和破灭。2006年6月7日,上证指数暴跌88.45点。2008年,美国次贷危机波及全球,引发金融海啸。上证指数从2007年10月的最高点6124点跌至2008年10月最低点1664点。截至2015年底,上证指数上涨12.6%,反弹至3600点。2016年1月,中国股市经历了大幅抛售,在市场下跌7%后,于2016年1月份7日停牌。2016年1月末26日,上证指数跌破2015年8月的最低点,1月27日跌至2638点。上证指数在2018年10月11日跌破2016年最低点2638点后,于10月18日跌破2500点,10月19日跌至2449点,较2015年最高点暴跌逾一半。{Qt}序列的表现与中国股市的实证观察结果一致。图4显示了{Qt}序列的直方图,这表明标准化的负对数回报可能遵循Fréchet分布。我们通过自回归尾部指数模型拟合{Qt},即Zhang(2020)中的模型(5.1)-(5.3)。拟合的参数值和标准偏差如表1所示。结果表明,所有参数都是显著的,这表明模型(5.1)-(5.3)适用于上证指数中87只股票的横截面最大值。图5显示了回收的尾部指数{αõt}。显然,当极端事件出现时,尾部指数往往会下降,反映出增加
Application of autoregressive tail-index model to China's stock market
We congratulate Professor Zhengjun Zhang for a topnotch contribution to the literature and thank the editor for the invitation to participate in the discussion of the excellent review paper. Zhang (2020) provides an informative summary ofmodelling systematic risk with nonlinear time series models and tail dependence measures based on extreme observations. In the current era, where risk management is becoming more and more important, this review paper is timely and will provide the impetus for future research in this and broader areas. Section 5.1 in Zhang (2020) proposes the autoregressive tail-index model to characterise and describe systematic risk and risk contagions. The autoregressive tail-index model is not only a good measure of systematic risk in the US stock market (Zhao et al., 2018), but can also be applied to the study of extreme climate (Deng et al., 2020) and other fields. In this discussion, we are more interested in whether the autoregressive tail-index model is also suitable to characterise the systematic risk in China’s stock market. We present an analysis of the stock negative log-returns of the Shanghai Composite Index (SSE Index), which is one of the most important indexes for China’s stock market. The data contains the daily closing prices of 180 components of SSE Index and is downloaded from WindFinancial Terminal from 01/05/2005 to 10/20/2020 with 3836 observations for each stock. Figure 1 plots the daily closing prices of SSE Index. Since SSE Index adjusts its component stocks every half year, we analyse 87 stocks that have always been included in the index from 01/05/2005 to 10/20/2020. For day t, we obtain 87 negative log-returns and calculate the maximaQ t = max1≤i≤87 ri,t , where ri,t is the daily negative log-return for stock i. Figure 2 shows the histogram of {Q t : t = 1, 2, . . . , 3836}. By Figure 2, we see that there are many daily maxima of negative log-returns clustered around 0.11, due to the Limit Up-Limit Down Rule of China’s stock market. This rule prohibits trading activity in exchangelisted securities at prices outside specified price bands. Motivated by Section 5.1 in Zhang (2020), we first fit a GARCH(1,1) model with normal distributed innovations to each individual negative log-retuens series. Using the negative log-returns series divided by the fitted volatilities, we obtain standardised negative log-returns series for each stock. Taking the maximum value of the 87 standardised negative log-returns each day, we obtain a time series {Qt : t = 1, 2, . . . , 3836}, see Figure 3. It is seen that there exist four possible peaks around June 2006, November 2008, January 2016 and September 2018. In fact, China’s stockmarket experienced substantial boom and burst during these five periods. On June 7, 2006, SSE Index plummeted 88.45 points. In 2008, the US subprime mortgage crisis spread to the world and triggered a financial tsunami. SSE Index dropped from the highest of 6124 in October 2007 to the lowest of 1664 in October 2008. By the end of 2015, SSE Index was up 12.6% rebounding to 3600. In January 2016, China’s stock market experienced a steep sell-off and trading was halted on January 7, 2016 after themarket fell 7%.On January 26, 2016, SSE Index fell below the lowest point in August 2015, and on January 27, it fell down to 2638. After SSE Index fell below the 2016 lowest point 2638 on October 11, 2018, it slid below 2500 on October 18, and fell to 2449 on October 19, which plunged more than half from the 2015 highest point. The performance of {Qt} series is consistent with the empirical observations related to China’s stock market. Figure 4 presents the histogram of {Qt} series, which indicates that the standardised negative log-returns possibly follow Fréchet distribution. We fit {Qt} by the autoregressive tail-index model, i.e. model (5.1)-(5.3) in Zhang (2020). The fitted parameter values and standard deviations are presented in Table 1. It is shown that all parameters are significant, which indicates model (5.1)–(5.3) is suitable for the cross-sectional maxima of 87 stocks in SSE Index. The recovered tail indexes {α̂t} are presented in Figure 5. Obviously, when the extreme events appear, the tail index tends to decrease, reflecting an increase