书评

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
Stuart Ivinson
{"title":"书评","authors":"Stuart Ivinson","doi":"10.1080/17416124.2019.1577547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 2007 Supreme Court ruling Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 and Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education, Chief Justice John Roberts declared, \"The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis on race.\" This decision found unconstitutional school districts' explicit use of race in deciding where students should attend public schools. As argued by Wells and associates in Both Sides Now: The Story of School Desegregations Graduates, the experiences of high school graduates in 1980 are posed to help policy makers contend with present and future policies related to school desegregation. As Vanessa Siddle Walker writes in the foreword, Both Sides Now \"unveils through first-person accounts a world of teaching and learning and school climate often masked in traditional desegregation studies\" (p. xiii). Such studies either focus on the mistreatment of black children in the short term or offer accounts of rising test scores and graduation rates in the long term (p. xii). In unmasking new desegregation accounts, the authors frame this study with considerations of continuing structural inequality, the prevalence of racial segregation in housing patterns, the resegregation of public schooling, and the racial consciousness or \"double consciousness\" of their participants. In explaining their decision to use these specific graduates, the authors write that \"the class of 1980 more than any other cohort of students before or after them ... has looked at racial equality from both sides now—from experiences in both desegregated and more segregated contexts, from the preReagan and the post-Reagan political eras\" (p. 35). From an initial list of twenty desegregated school districts that were demographically and geographically diverse, these scholars chose six high schools from which to interview the graduates: Austin High School (Texas); Dwight Morrow High School (New Jersey); John Muir High School (California); Shaker Heights High School (Ohio); Topeka High School (Kansas); and West Charlotte High School (New Carolina). In addition to utilizing historical documents, data were largely drawn from interviews with policy makers, lawyers, educators, community members, and graduates (primarily African American, Latino, and white) from the class of 1980. Although the total number of interviews","PeriodicalId":40914,"journal":{"name":"Arms & Armour","volume":"16 1","pages":"117 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17416124.2019.1577547","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review\",\"authors\":\"Stuart Ivinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17416124.2019.1577547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the 2007 Supreme Court ruling Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 and Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education, Chief Justice John Roberts declared, \\\"The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis on race.\\\" This decision found unconstitutional school districts' explicit use of race in deciding where students should attend public schools. As argued by Wells and associates in Both Sides Now: The Story of School Desegregations Graduates, the experiences of high school graduates in 1980 are posed to help policy makers contend with present and future policies related to school desegregation. As Vanessa Siddle Walker writes in the foreword, Both Sides Now \\\"unveils through first-person accounts a world of teaching and learning and school climate often masked in traditional desegregation studies\\\" (p. xiii). Such studies either focus on the mistreatment of black children in the short term or offer accounts of rising test scores and graduation rates in the long term (p. xii). In unmasking new desegregation accounts, the authors frame this study with considerations of continuing structural inequality, the prevalence of racial segregation in housing patterns, the resegregation of public schooling, and the racial consciousness or \\\"double consciousness\\\" of their participants. In explaining their decision to use these specific graduates, the authors write that \\\"the class of 1980 more than any other cohort of students before or after them ... has looked at racial equality from both sides now—from experiences in both desegregated and more segregated contexts, from the preReagan and the post-Reagan political eras\\\" (p. 35). From an initial list of twenty desegregated school districts that were demographically and geographically diverse, these scholars chose six high schools from which to interview the graduates: Austin High School (Texas); Dwight Morrow High School (New Jersey); John Muir High School (California); Shaker Heights High School (Ohio); Topeka High School (Kansas); and West Charlotte High School (New Carolina). In addition to utilizing historical documents, data were largely drawn from interviews with policy makers, lawyers, educators, community members, and graduates (primarily African American, Latino, and white) from the class of 1980. Although the total number of interviews\",\"PeriodicalId\":40914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arms & Armour\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"117 - 119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17416124.2019.1577547\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arms & Armour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17416124.2019.1577547\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arms & Armour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17416124.2019.1577547","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2007年最高法院的裁决“参与社区学校的家长诉西雅图第一学区”和“梅雷迪思诉杰斐逊县教育委员会”中,首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨宣称:“停止基于种族的歧视的方法是停止基于种族歧视。“这一决定发现,学区在决定学生应该在哪里上公立学校时明确使用种族是违宪的。正如威尔斯和他的同事在《现在双方:学校取消种族隔离的故事》中所说,1980年高中毕业生的经历是为了帮助决策者应对当前和未来与学校取消种族歧视有关的政策Siddle Walker在前言中写道,“现在双方都通过第一人称叙述揭示了一个在传统的废除种族隔离研究中经常被掩盖的教学和学校氛围的世界”(第xiii页)。这些研究要么着眼于短期内对黑人儿童的虐待,要么着眼于长期内考试成绩和毕业率的上升(第xii页)。在揭示新的取消种族隔离的说法时,作者将这项研究与持续的结构性不平等、住房模式中种族隔离的普遍性、公立学校的重新种族隔离以及参与者的种族意识或“双重意识”联系起来。在解释他们使用这些特定毕业生的决定时,作者写道,“1980届的学生比他们之前或之后的任何其他学生都更……现在从两个方面看待种族平等——从废除种族隔离和更种族隔离的背景下的经历,从里根之前和里根之后的政治时代”(第35页)。从最初的20个人口和地理多样的取消种族隔离的学区名单中,这些学者选择了六所高中来采访毕业生:奥斯汀高中(德克萨斯州);德怀特·莫罗高中(新泽西州);约翰·缪尔高中(加利福尼亚州);Shaker Heights高中(俄亥俄州);托皮卡高中(堪萨斯州);以及西夏洛特高中(新卡罗莱纳州)。除了利用历史文献外,数据主要来自对政策制定者、律师、教育工作者、社区成员和1980届毕业生(主要是非裔美国人、拉丁裔和白人)的采访。尽管面试总数
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review
In the 2007 Supreme Court ruling Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 and Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education, Chief Justice John Roberts declared, "The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis on race." This decision found unconstitutional school districts' explicit use of race in deciding where students should attend public schools. As argued by Wells and associates in Both Sides Now: The Story of School Desegregations Graduates, the experiences of high school graduates in 1980 are posed to help policy makers contend with present and future policies related to school desegregation. As Vanessa Siddle Walker writes in the foreword, Both Sides Now "unveils through first-person accounts a world of teaching and learning and school climate often masked in traditional desegregation studies" (p. xiii). Such studies either focus on the mistreatment of black children in the short term or offer accounts of rising test scores and graduation rates in the long term (p. xii). In unmasking new desegregation accounts, the authors frame this study with considerations of continuing structural inequality, the prevalence of racial segregation in housing patterns, the resegregation of public schooling, and the racial consciousness or "double consciousness" of their participants. In explaining their decision to use these specific graduates, the authors write that "the class of 1980 more than any other cohort of students before or after them ... has looked at racial equality from both sides now—from experiences in both desegregated and more segregated contexts, from the preReagan and the post-Reagan political eras" (p. 35). From an initial list of twenty desegregated school districts that were demographically and geographically diverse, these scholars chose six high schools from which to interview the graduates: Austin High School (Texas); Dwight Morrow High School (New Jersey); John Muir High School (California); Shaker Heights High School (Ohio); Topeka High School (Kansas); and West Charlotte High School (New Carolina). In addition to utilizing historical documents, data were largely drawn from interviews with policy makers, lawyers, educators, community members, and graduates (primarily African American, Latino, and white) from the class of 1980. Although the total number of interviews
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arms & Armour
Arms & Armour MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信