“懒银行”与“安全资产”假说:新兴市场公共债务与金融发展指标之谜的答案吗?

Q4 Social Sciences
Morad Abdel-Halim, Ghazi Al-Assaf
{"title":"“懒银行”与“安全资产”假说:新兴市场公共债务与金融发展指标之谜的答案吗?","authors":"Morad Abdel-Halim, Ghazi Al-Assaf","doi":"10.54609/reaser.v23i1.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the role of public debt in financial development in an emerging market namely, Jordan. Based on previous empirical research, we test the empirical prediction of two hypotheses for the role of public debt: “safe asset” vs “lazy banks”. Using annual data over the period of 2008 to 2018 and using the Fixed Effect (FE) and Bias Correction Fixed Effects (BCFE) methodologies that control for both unobservable banks specific and time-specific variables. We find that public debt has a positive impact on financial development after controlling for Banks size, Banks risk. ROA, Capital Adequacy, and Banks Capitalization. The results provide weak evidence consistent with the “Safe Asset” hypothesis that banks choose to invest in treasury securities as safe assets.","PeriodicalId":36203,"journal":{"name":"Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Lazy banks” and “Safe asset” Hypothesis: Is it the answer for Public Debt and Financial Development Indicators Puzzle in Emerging Markets?\",\"authors\":\"Morad Abdel-Halim, Ghazi Al-Assaf\",\"doi\":\"10.54609/reaser.v23i1.127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the role of public debt in financial development in an emerging market namely, Jordan. Based on previous empirical research, we test the empirical prediction of two hypotheses for the role of public debt: “safe asset” vs “lazy banks”. Using annual data over the period of 2008 to 2018 and using the Fixed Effect (FE) and Bias Correction Fixed Effects (BCFE) methodologies that control for both unobservable banks specific and time-specific variables. We find that public debt has a positive impact on financial development after controlling for Banks size, Banks risk. ROA, Capital Adequacy, and Banks Capitalization. The results provide weak evidence consistent with the “Safe Asset” hypothesis that banks choose to invest in treasury securities as safe assets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54609/reaser.v23i1.127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54609/reaser.v23i1.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了公共债务在约旦新兴市场金融发展中的作用。在以往实证研究的基础上,我们检验了两个假设对公共债务作用的实证预测:“安全资产”与“懒惰银行”。使用2008年至2018年期间的年度数据,并使用固定效应(FE)和偏差校正固定效应(BCFE)方法,控制不可观测的银行特定变量和时间特定变量。我们发现,在控制了银行规模、银行风险后,公共债务对金融发展有积极影响。ROA、资本充足率和银行资本化。研究结果提供了与“安全资产”假说一致的薄弱证据,即银行选择将国债作为安全资产进行投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Lazy banks” and “Safe asset” Hypothesis: Is it the answer for Public Debt and Financial Development Indicators Puzzle in Emerging Markets?
This paper investigates the role of public debt in financial development in an emerging market namely, Jordan. Based on previous empirical research, we test the empirical prediction of two hypotheses for the role of public debt: “safe asset” vs “lazy banks”. Using annual data over the period of 2008 to 2018 and using the Fixed Effect (FE) and Bias Correction Fixed Effects (BCFE) methodologies that control for both unobservable banks specific and time-specific variables. We find that public debt has a positive impact on financial development after controlling for Banks size, Banks risk. ROA, Capital Adequacy, and Banks Capitalization. The results provide weak evidence consistent with the “Safe Asset” hypothesis that banks choose to invest in treasury securities as safe assets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research
Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信