乳酸脱氢酶能否作为鱼类厌氧活性指标?

C. Schoenebeck, Erik Prenosil, Brianna Pallas, A. Abrams, K. A. Carlson
{"title":"乳酸脱氢酶能否作为鱼类厌氧活性指标?","authors":"C. Schoenebeck, Erik Prenosil, Brianna Pallas, A. Abrams, K. A. Carlson","doi":"10.13014/k21r6nqh","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anaerobic activities such as those associated with spawning, foraging for prey, and predator avoidance are difficult to quantify in wild fish. This study experimentally evaluated if the muscle enzyme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) can be used to index recent anaerobic activity in fish by testing the hypothesis that muscle LDH activity will be greater in exercised fish than in rested fish. We used burst swimming motions in a swim tunnel to elicit anaerobic metabolism in a 5 day anaerobic exercise treatment (n = 30) and a rested control group (n = 30). On average the exercised fish produced significantly more LDH in their muscle tissue (average = 19.5 IU/ug, SE = 1.8, F = 12.88, df = 2, 57, P < 0.001) due to the increased anaerobic activity than rested fish (average = 13.4 IU/ug, SE = 0.9). However, large individual variability in LDH activity within groups resulted in some overlap between treatment groups. Therefore we suggest limiting the use of LDH activity to infer relative comparisons of anaerobic activity among groups until the relationship is more clearly understood.","PeriodicalId":91981,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and affiliated societies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Lactate Dehydrogenase be used to Index Anaerobic Activity in Fishes?\",\"authors\":\"C. Schoenebeck, Erik Prenosil, Brianna Pallas, A. Abrams, K. A. Carlson\",\"doi\":\"10.13014/k21r6nqh\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anaerobic activities such as those associated with spawning, foraging for prey, and predator avoidance are difficult to quantify in wild fish. This study experimentally evaluated if the muscle enzyme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) can be used to index recent anaerobic activity in fish by testing the hypothesis that muscle LDH activity will be greater in exercised fish than in rested fish. We used burst swimming motions in a swim tunnel to elicit anaerobic metabolism in a 5 day anaerobic exercise treatment (n = 30) and a rested control group (n = 30). On average the exercised fish produced significantly more LDH in their muscle tissue (average = 19.5 IU/ug, SE = 1.8, F = 12.88, df = 2, 57, P < 0.001) due to the increased anaerobic activity than rested fish (average = 13.4 IU/ug, SE = 0.9). However, large individual variability in LDH activity within groups resulted in some overlap between treatment groups. Therefore we suggest limiting the use of LDH activity to infer relative comparisons of anaerobic activity among groups until the relationship is more clearly understood.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and affiliated societies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and affiliated societies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13014/k21r6nqh\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and affiliated societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13014/k21r6nqh","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

厌氧活动,如与产卵、觅食和躲避捕食者有关的活动,在野生鱼类中很难量化。本研究通过测试运动鱼类的肌肉LDH活性高于休息鱼类的假设,通过实验评估了肌肉酶LDH是否可以用于指示鱼类最近的厌氧活性。在为期5天的无氧运动治疗(n=30)和休息的对照组(n=30。平均而言,与休息鱼类(平均=13.4 IU/ug,SE=0.9)相比,由于无氧活性增加,运动鱼类的肌肉组织中产生的LDH显著增加(平均=19.5 IU/ug、SE=1.8、F=12.88、df=2、57,P<0.001)。然而,组内LDH活性的个体差异较大,导致治疗组之间存在一些重叠。因此,我们建议限制使用LDH活性来推断各组之间厌氧活性的相对比较,直到更清楚地了解这种关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Lactate Dehydrogenase be used to Index Anaerobic Activity in Fishes?
Anaerobic activities such as those associated with spawning, foraging for prey, and predator avoidance are difficult to quantify in wild fish. This study experimentally evaluated if the muscle enzyme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) can be used to index recent anaerobic activity in fish by testing the hypothesis that muscle LDH activity will be greater in exercised fish than in rested fish. We used burst swimming motions in a swim tunnel to elicit anaerobic metabolism in a 5 day anaerobic exercise treatment (n = 30) and a rested control group (n = 30). On average the exercised fish produced significantly more LDH in their muscle tissue (average = 19.5 IU/ug, SE = 1.8, F = 12.88, df = 2, 57, P < 0.001) due to the increased anaerobic activity than rested fish (average = 13.4 IU/ug, SE = 0.9). However, large individual variability in LDH activity within groups resulted in some overlap between treatment groups. Therefore we suggest limiting the use of LDH activity to infer relative comparisons of anaerobic activity among groups until the relationship is more clearly understood.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信