马来西亚性骚扰法律的新篇章:骚扰和性骚扰侵权行为的出现

A. Majid, Sri Yogamalar, A. K. L. Siah, Jane Terpstra-Tong, L. Borrowman
{"title":"马来西亚性骚扰法律的新篇章:骚扰和性骚扰侵权行为的出现","authors":"A. Majid, Sri Yogamalar, A. K. L. Siah, Jane Terpstra-Tong, L. Borrowman","doi":"10.1177/1473779519875464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a landmark case in 2016, Malaysia’s apex court, the Federal Court, explicitly recognised for the first time, the common law tort of sexual harassment. Actually, the Federal Court did more than that; its recognition of the common law tort of sexual harassment is built on its recognising the common law tort of harassment. The recognition of the tort of harassment has escaped notice because attention has been concentrated on the tort of sexual harassment. This article analyses the Federal Court’s exposition of the tort of sexual harassment to reveal that the exegesis itself acknowledges the existence of the tort of harassment per se. The tort of harassment that the Federal Court sent out into the world is largely a creature of its English common law ancestry.","PeriodicalId":87174,"journal":{"name":"Common law world review","volume":"48 1","pages":"191 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473779519875464","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new chapter in the law of sexual harassment in Malaysia: The emergence of the torts of harassment and sexual harassment\",\"authors\":\"A. Majid, Sri Yogamalar, A. K. L. Siah, Jane Terpstra-Tong, L. Borrowman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1473779519875464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a landmark case in 2016, Malaysia’s apex court, the Federal Court, explicitly recognised for the first time, the common law tort of sexual harassment. Actually, the Federal Court did more than that; its recognition of the common law tort of sexual harassment is built on its recognising the common law tort of harassment. The recognition of the tort of harassment has escaped notice because attention has been concentrated on the tort of sexual harassment. This article analyses the Federal Court’s exposition of the tort of sexual harassment to reveal that the exegesis itself acknowledges the existence of the tort of harassment per se. The tort of harassment that the Federal Court sent out into the world is largely a creature of its English common law ancestry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Common law world review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"191 - 207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473779519875464\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Common law world review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473779519875464\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Common law world review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473779519875464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2016年的一个具有里程碑意义的案件中,马来西亚最高法院联邦法院首次明确承认了性骚扰的普通法侵权行为。实际上,联邦法院做的远不止这些;其对普通法性骚扰侵权行为的承认是建立在对普通法性骚扰侵权行为的承认之上的。由于人们对性骚扰侵权行为的关注一直集中在性骚扰侵权行为上,因此对性骚扰侵权行为的认定一直没有引起人们的注意。本文分析了联邦法院对性骚扰侵权行为的阐释,揭示了联邦法院对性骚扰侵权行为的阐释本身就承认了性骚扰侵权行为的存在。联邦法院向世界推出的骚扰侵权法在很大程度上是其英国普通法祖先的产物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A new chapter in the law of sexual harassment in Malaysia: The emergence of the torts of harassment and sexual harassment
In a landmark case in 2016, Malaysia’s apex court, the Federal Court, explicitly recognised for the first time, the common law tort of sexual harassment. Actually, the Federal Court did more than that; its recognition of the common law tort of sexual harassment is built on its recognising the common law tort of harassment. The recognition of the tort of harassment has escaped notice because attention has been concentrated on the tort of sexual harassment. This article analyses the Federal Court’s exposition of the tort of sexual harassment to reveal that the exegesis itself acknowledges the existence of the tort of harassment per se. The tort of harassment that the Federal Court sent out into the world is largely a creature of its English common law ancestry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信