使用脑活动和行为数据预测重度抑郁症治疗反应的计算方法:系统回顾

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Network Neuroscience Pub Date : 2022-10-01 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1162/netn_a_00233
Povilas Karvelis, Colleen E Charlton, Shona G Allohverdi, Peter Bedford, Daniel J Hauke, Andreea O Diaconescu
{"title":"使用脑活动和行为数据预测重度抑郁症治疗反应的计算方法:系统回顾","authors":"Povilas Karvelis, Colleen E Charlton, Shona G Allohverdi, Peter Bedford, Daniel J Hauke, Andreea O Diaconescu","doi":"10.1162/netn_a_00233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major depressive disorder is a heterogeneous diagnostic category with multiple available treatments. With the goal of optimizing treatment selection, researchers are developing computational models that attempt to predict treatment response based on various pretreatment measures. In this paper, we review studies that use brain activity data to predict treatment response. Our aim is to highlight and clarify important methodological differences between various studies that relate to the incorporation of domain knowledge, specifically within two approaches delineated as data-driven and theory-driven. We argue that theory-driven generative modeling, which explicitly models information processing in the brain and thus can capture disease mechanisms, is a promising emerging approach that is only beginning to be utilized in treatment response prediction. The predictors extracted via such models could improve interpretability, which is critical for clinical decision-making. We also identify several methodological limitations across the reviewed studies and provide suggestions for addressing them. Namely, we consider problems with dichotomizing treatment outcomes, the importance of investigating more than one treatment in a given study for differential treatment response predictions, the need for a patient-centered approach for defining treatment outcomes, and finally, the use of internal and external validation methods for improving model generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48520,"journal":{"name":"Network Neuroscience","volume":"6 1","pages":"1066-1103"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11117101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational approaches to treatment response prediction in major depression using brain activity and behavioral data: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Povilas Karvelis, Colleen E Charlton, Shona G Allohverdi, Peter Bedford, Daniel J Hauke, Andreea O Diaconescu\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/netn_a_00233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Major depressive disorder is a heterogeneous diagnostic category with multiple available treatments. With the goal of optimizing treatment selection, researchers are developing computational models that attempt to predict treatment response based on various pretreatment measures. In this paper, we review studies that use brain activity data to predict treatment response. Our aim is to highlight and clarify important methodological differences between various studies that relate to the incorporation of domain knowledge, specifically within two approaches delineated as data-driven and theory-driven. We argue that theory-driven generative modeling, which explicitly models information processing in the brain and thus can capture disease mechanisms, is a promising emerging approach that is only beginning to be utilized in treatment response prediction. The predictors extracted via such models could improve interpretability, which is critical for clinical decision-making. We also identify several methodological limitations across the reviewed studies and provide suggestions for addressing them. Namely, we consider problems with dichotomizing treatment outcomes, the importance of investigating more than one treatment in a given study for differential treatment response predictions, the need for a patient-centered approach for defining treatment outcomes, and finally, the use of internal and external validation methods for improving model generalizability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Network Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"1066-1103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11117101/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Network Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00233\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Network Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要重性抑郁障碍是一个异质性的诊断类别,有多种可用的治疗方法。为了优化治疗选择,研究人员正在开发计算模型,试图根据各种预处理措施预测治疗反应。在这篇论文中,我们回顾了使用大脑活动数据来预测治疗反应的研究。我们的目的是强调和澄清与领域知识整合相关的各种研究之间的重要方法差异,特别是在数据驱动和理论驱动的两种方法中。我们认为,理论驱动的生成建模是一种很有前途的新兴方法,它明确地对大脑中的信息处理进行建模,从而可以捕捉疾病机制,而这种方法才刚刚开始用于治疗反应预测。通过这些模型提取的预测因子可以提高可解释性,这对临床决策至关重要。我们还确定了审查研究中的几个方法局限性,并提出了解决这些局限性的建议。也就是说,我们考虑了将治疗结果进行二分的问题,在给定的研究中调查不止一种治疗对差异治疗反应预测的重要性,需要以患者为中心的方法来定义治疗结果,最后,使用内部和外部验证方法来提高模型的可推广性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computational approaches to treatment response prediction in major depression using brain activity and behavioral data: A systematic review.

Major depressive disorder is a heterogeneous diagnostic category with multiple available treatments. With the goal of optimizing treatment selection, researchers are developing computational models that attempt to predict treatment response based on various pretreatment measures. In this paper, we review studies that use brain activity data to predict treatment response. Our aim is to highlight and clarify important methodological differences between various studies that relate to the incorporation of domain knowledge, specifically within two approaches delineated as data-driven and theory-driven. We argue that theory-driven generative modeling, which explicitly models information processing in the brain and thus can capture disease mechanisms, is a promising emerging approach that is only beginning to be utilized in treatment response prediction. The predictors extracted via such models could improve interpretability, which is critical for clinical decision-making. We also identify several methodological limitations across the reviewed studies and provide suggestions for addressing them. Namely, we consider problems with dichotomizing treatment outcomes, the importance of investigating more than one treatment in a given study for differential treatment response predictions, the need for a patient-centered approach for defining treatment outcomes, and finally, the use of internal and external validation methods for improving model generalizability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Network Neuroscience
Network Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
68
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信