Z. F. Albahash, M. Sharba, Bahaa Aldin Abass Hasan
{"title":"模拟汽车碰撞下后底盘保护装置的耐撞性能","authors":"Z. F. Albahash, M. Sharba, Bahaa Aldin Abass Hasan","doi":"10.4271/15-16-03-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A rear underrun protection device (RUPD) plays a fundamental role in reducing the\n risk of running a small car beneath the rear or the side of a heavy truck\n because of the difference in structure heights in the event of a vehicle\n collision. Even in cars with five-star safety ratings, crashing into a truck\n with poorly designed RUPD results in a passenger compartment intrusion (PCI)\n more than the maximum allowable limit as per the United States (US) American\n National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) standards Federal Motor\n Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS). In this article, mild steel was used to\n fabricate the new designs of RUPD. The design was analyzed using finite element\n (FE) analysis LS-DYNA software. Simulations of a Toyota Yaris 2010 and Ford\n Taurus 2001 were performed at a constant speed of 63 km/h at the time of impact.\n The ability to prevent severe injuries in a collision with the rear side of the\n truck was estimated to optimize the underrun design. The new design has achieved\n the goal of decreasing the head acceleration beyond the limit, which is less\n than 60 g. It has achieved a reduction in acceleration by 66.116% and zero PCIs\n even in collisions with different safety ratings cars.","PeriodicalId":29661,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Passenger Vehicle Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crashworthiness Performance of Rear Underrun Protection Device under\\n Simulated Car Collision\",\"authors\":\"Z. F. Albahash, M. Sharba, Bahaa Aldin Abass Hasan\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/15-16-03-0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A rear underrun protection device (RUPD) plays a fundamental role in reducing the\\n risk of running a small car beneath the rear or the side of a heavy truck\\n because of the difference in structure heights in the event of a vehicle\\n collision. Even in cars with five-star safety ratings, crashing into a truck\\n with poorly designed RUPD results in a passenger compartment intrusion (PCI)\\n more than the maximum allowable limit as per the United States (US) American\\n National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) standards Federal Motor\\n Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS). In this article, mild steel was used to\\n fabricate the new designs of RUPD. The design was analyzed using finite element\\n (FE) analysis LS-DYNA software. Simulations of a Toyota Yaris 2010 and Ford\\n Taurus 2001 were performed at a constant speed of 63 km/h at the time of impact.\\n The ability to prevent severe injuries in a collision with the rear side of the\\n truck was estimated to optimize the underrun design. The new design has achieved\\n the goal of decreasing the head acceleration beyond the limit, which is less\\n than 60 g. It has achieved a reduction in acceleration by 66.116% and zero PCIs\\n even in collisions with different safety ratings cars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAE International Journal of Passenger Vehicle Systems\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAE International Journal of Passenger Vehicle Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/15-16-03-0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Passenger Vehicle Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/15-16-03-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Crashworthiness Performance of Rear Underrun Protection Device under
Simulated Car Collision
A rear underrun protection device (RUPD) plays a fundamental role in reducing the
risk of running a small car beneath the rear or the side of a heavy truck
because of the difference in structure heights in the event of a vehicle
collision. Even in cars with five-star safety ratings, crashing into a truck
with poorly designed RUPD results in a passenger compartment intrusion (PCI)
more than the maximum allowable limit as per the United States (US) American
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) standards Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS). In this article, mild steel was used to
fabricate the new designs of RUPD. The design was analyzed using finite element
(FE) analysis LS-DYNA software. Simulations of a Toyota Yaris 2010 and Ford
Taurus 2001 were performed at a constant speed of 63 km/h at the time of impact.
The ability to prevent severe injuries in a collision with the rear side of the
truck was estimated to optimize the underrun design. The new design has achieved
the goal of decreasing the head acceleration beyond the limit, which is less
than 60 g. It has achieved a reduction in acceleration by 66.116% and zero PCIs
even in collisions with different safety ratings cars.