模拟汽车碰撞下后底盘保护装置的耐撞性能

IF 0.5 Q4 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Z. F. Albahash, M. Sharba, Bahaa Aldin Abass Hasan
{"title":"模拟汽车碰撞下后底盘保护装置的耐撞性能","authors":"Z. F. Albahash, M. Sharba, Bahaa Aldin Abass Hasan","doi":"10.4271/15-16-03-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A rear underrun protection device (RUPD) plays a fundamental role in reducing the\n risk of running a small car beneath the rear or the side of a heavy truck\n because of the difference in structure heights in the event of a vehicle\n collision. Even in cars with five-star safety ratings, crashing into a truck\n with poorly designed RUPD results in a passenger compartment intrusion (PCI)\n more than the maximum allowable limit as per the United States (US) American\n National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) standards Federal Motor\n Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS). In this article, mild steel was used to\n fabricate the new designs of RUPD. The design was analyzed using finite element\n (FE) analysis LS-DYNA software. Simulations of a Toyota Yaris 2010 and Ford\n Taurus 2001 were performed at a constant speed of 63 km/h at the time of impact.\n The ability to prevent severe injuries in a collision with the rear side of the\n truck was estimated to optimize the underrun design. The new design has achieved\n the goal of decreasing the head acceleration beyond the limit, which is less\n than 60 g. It has achieved a reduction in acceleration by 66.116% and zero PCIs\n even in collisions with different safety ratings cars.","PeriodicalId":29661,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Passenger Vehicle Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crashworthiness Performance of Rear Underrun Protection Device under\\n Simulated Car Collision\",\"authors\":\"Z. F. Albahash, M. Sharba, Bahaa Aldin Abass Hasan\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/15-16-03-0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A rear underrun protection device (RUPD) plays a fundamental role in reducing the\\n risk of running a small car beneath the rear or the side of a heavy truck\\n because of the difference in structure heights in the event of a vehicle\\n collision. Even in cars with five-star safety ratings, crashing into a truck\\n with poorly designed RUPD results in a passenger compartment intrusion (PCI)\\n more than the maximum allowable limit as per the United States (US) American\\n National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) standards Federal Motor\\n Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS). In this article, mild steel was used to\\n fabricate the new designs of RUPD. The design was analyzed using finite element\\n (FE) analysis LS-DYNA software. Simulations of a Toyota Yaris 2010 and Ford\\n Taurus 2001 were performed at a constant speed of 63 km/h at the time of impact.\\n The ability to prevent severe injuries in a collision with the rear side of the\\n truck was estimated to optimize the underrun design. The new design has achieved\\n the goal of decreasing the head acceleration beyond the limit, which is less\\n than 60 g. It has achieved a reduction in acceleration by 66.116% and zero PCIs\\n even in collisions with different safety ratings cars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAE International Journal of Passenger Vehicle Systems\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAE International Journal of Passenger Vehicle Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/15-16-03-0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Passenger Vehicle Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/15-16-03-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于车辆碰撞时结构高度的差异,后部防钻撞保护装置(RUPD)在降低小型汽车在重型卡车后部或侧面下方行驶的风险方面发挥着重要作用。即使在五星级安全评级的汽车中,撞上设计糟糕的RUPD卡车也会导致乘客舱侵入(PCI)超过美国国家公路交通安全管理局(NHTSA)标准联邦机动车安全标准(FMVSS)的最大允许限值。在这篇文章中,低碳钢被用来制造RUPD的新设计。使用有限元分析LS-DYNA软件对设计进行了分析。丰田雅力士2010和福特Taurus 2001在撞击时以63公里/小时的恒定速度进行了模拟。在与卡车后侧碰撞时防止严重伤害的能力被估计为优化了欠载设计。新设计实现了将头部加速度降低到极限以下的目标,即小于60 g。即使在与不同安全等级的汽车碰撞时,它也实现了加速度降低66.116%和零PCI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crashworthiness Performance of Rear Underrun Protection Device under Simulated Car Collision
A rear underrun protection device (RUPD) plays a fundamental role in reducing the risk of running a small car beneath the rear or the side of a heavy truck because of the difference in structure heights in the event of a vehicle collision. Even in cars with five-star safety ratings, crashing into a truck with poorly designed RUPD results in a passenger compartment intrusion (PCI) more than the maximum allowable limit as per the United States (US) American National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) standards Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS). In this article, mild steel was used to fabricate the new designs of RUPD. The design was analyzed using finite element (FE) analysis LS-DYNA software. Simulations of a Toyota Yaris 2010 and Ford Taurus 2001 were performed at a constant speed of 63 km/h at the time of impact. The ability to prevent severe injuries in a collision with the rear side of the truck was estimated to optimize the underrun design. The new design has achieved the goal of decreasing the head acceleration beyond the limit, which is less than 60 g. It has achieved a reduction in acceleration by 66.116% and zero PCIs even in collisions with different safety ratings cars.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信